On Nov 3, 9:46 am, "H gar" <hs...
> "Brad Guth" <bradg...
@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Since I received nothing but the usual topic/author stalking grief and
> avoidance about our potentially hollow moon (natural as well as TBM
> hollowed out), I ve revised this topic from original The 1~10% hollow
> moon as to offering The 0.1~1% hollow moon . Not that it really
> matters all that much, because the mainstream of our insider status-
> quo still isn t buying into any of it, nor allowing mainstream media
> or even K12s to pick up on any notions of such.
> Still a babbling idiot, ain't cha ....
> The fact that the Moon, created from a collision between a Mars sized object
> with the early Earth at an oblique angle (in the game of pool called
> "English"), didn't have much of a heavy metal core to begin with and it
> cooled much faster than the Earth, from which it originated. The outside
> solidified, but the interior took a bit longer to cool, hence cracks formed
> in the interior. But neither you nor science has an accurate accounting of
> how wide, deep or how long these cracks or fissures really are, or even if
> they were the source of the mysterious "ringing" that was detected on the
> So stop bothering us with your crapola 1% hollow Moon bullshit, because
> you're just pulling it out of your sorry ass and it is beginning to stink up
> this NG. We'd much rather listen to your tales of structures on Venus.
Are you still suggesting that our trusty moon couldn't possibly be or
ever become 0.1% empty?
A 1% hollow moon (natural plus TBM carved out) gives each and every
man, woman and child on Earth a volume of 3.14e7 m3 to play with. Are
you suggesting that non-rednecks and especially of those less than
white skinned Zionists/Semites would simply not know what to do with
such a nicely protected volume?
Are you suggesting there'd be nothing of any value in those TBM