Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Expanding earth animation -- proof that the earth is hollow!

3 views
Skip to first unread message

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 1:32:51 AM1/29/12
to
Expanding earth animation at -
http://hollowearththeory.com/articles/expandingEarthAnimation.asp

If the earth is expanding, this proves that it has to be hollow unless
there is a hellova lot more space dust adding to its dimensions, and I
mean a lot!!

Where is all this space dust???


See also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ&feature=related
10 minutes - shows earth pic from 65+ million years ago then expands
it, the oceans are all less than about 70m years old


Pilot explains how there are no fly zones over the north pole

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCk3Mz7o9Ks&feature=related no fly
zones - north pole - talks about a conversation he had with a pilot
who said that nobody actually flies over north pole


carole
www.conspiracee.com
Suppression Of Great Truth Is The Norm It Seems (8-30-2010)
http://tinyurl.com/7rb638m

Message has been deleted

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 3:35:45 AM1/29/12
to
On Jan 29, 7:09 pm, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:32:51 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>
> carole <hubbca2...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> To my friend in SGE, please place all followup to MHA, Carole is off
> looking for help/recruits to he woo nonsense
>
> >Expanding earth animation at -
> >http://hollowearththeory.com/articles/expandingEarthAnimation.asp
>
> >If the earth is expanding, this proves that it has to be hollow unless
> >there is a hellova lot more space dust adding to its dimensions, and I
> >mean a lot!!
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_physics
>
> <cite>
>     Any body suspended in space will remain in space until made aware
> of its situation. Then the regular laws of gravity take over. (The
> character walks off the edge of a cliff, remains suspended in midair,
> and doesn't fall until he looks down.)
>     Any body passing through solid matter (usually at high
> velocities) will leave a perforation conforming to its perimeter (the
> "silhouette of passage").
>     Certain bodies can pass through solid walls painted to resemble
> tunnel entrances; others cannot. (Corollary: Portable holes work.)
>     All principles of gravity are negated by fear. (i.e., scaring
> someone causes him to jump impossibly high in the air.)
>     Any violent rearrangement of feline matter is impermanent. (In
> other words, cats heal fast and/or have an infinite number of lives.)
> Corollary: Cats can fit into unusually small spaces.
>     Everything falls faster than an anvil. (A falling anvil will
> always land directly upon the character's head, squashing him flat or
> driving him into the ground, regardless of the time gap between the
> body's and the anvil's respective drops.)
>     A body will contort and stay contorted to any hole or container
> that is smaller than it. (Cat goes in mouse hole and comes out as a
> long semicircle or person is crammed into guitar case and remains in
> the shape of a guitar when he comes out.)
>     Any vehicle on a path of travel is at a state of indeterminacy
> until an object enters a location which is in the path of travel.
> (Wolf walks into road and gets run over by a bus.)
> </cite>
>
> All proven with Animations, Carole.
>
> The simple exploitation Carole is that it is a series of drawing
> which have no real relationship to reality.
>
> As it has been explained to you before it isn't evidence, it is a
> just cartoon.
>
> >Where is all this space dust???
>
> The small amount of in falling dust is offset but the water vapor and
> hydrogen which actually escapes the earth's gravitation well. and is
> swept away by solar wind.
>
> >See alsohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ&feature=related
> >10 minutes - shows earth pic from 65+ million years ago then expands
> >it, the oceans are all less than about 70m years old
>
> It is an animation. It isn't evidence of anything Carole.
>
> >Pilot explains how there are no fly zones over the north pole
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCk3Mz7o9Ks&feature=relatedno fly
> >zones - north pole - talks about a conversation he had with a pilot
> >who said that nobody actually flies over north pole
>
> Actually Carole this is worse than anything else you brought up, The
> man in the video is literally talking out of his ass! He is a person
> talking about something a person which he refuses to identify might
> have said?
>
> How can you be so stupid?
>
> Even Woo misters know you are posting nonsense:
> attsupwiththat.com/2011/12/23/great-circle-route-over-the-pole-cleared-for-bransons-virgin-air/
>
> Like I asked, how stupid can you get, Carole?
>
> --
> Bob Officer
> The 1st rule of Usenet, do not commit a typo or misspell a word while flaming someone else for the same offense.
> "And you have been taught admitting you are into "child devolvement"." Carole Hubbard flaming me for a typo, while herself committing a typo.
> Message-ID: <rNmCq.6761$7r4.2...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>

I'm allowed to post to sci.geo.geology.
Why shouldn't I?

You're not the moderator of sci.geo.geology.

--
Message has been deleted

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 4:24:15 AM1/29/12
to
On Jan 29, 8:11 pm, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:35:45 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
> Because you are stupid?
>
> >You're not the moderator of sci.geo.geology.
>
> I am not telling that you can not post anywhere, Carole.
>
> I am simply pointing out the fact you are utterly stupid.
>
> A cartoon or animation is simply not0 evidence.
>
> I can not stop you from showing people that you are a idiot.
>
> --
> Bob Officer
>
> "One of my pet hates is being made an idiot
> out of ...but you go right ahead"
> Carole Hubbard in Message-ID:
> <RWpco.4333$FH2.4...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>


What's the matter bob, afraid you'll be shown up as the complete moron
you really are?


Carole
www.conspiracee.com
"There are known knowns - there are things we know that we know.
There are known unknowns - that is to say, there are things that we
know we don't know.
But there are also unknown unknowns - there are things we don't know
we don't know." -- Donald Rumsfeld
Message has been deleted

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 12:13:16 PM1/29/12
to
On Jan 30, 3:15 am, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:
> To those on SGE, Carole is on a hunting trip, trolling for support
> from the scattered Usenet Kooks.
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:24:15 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>
> carole <hubbca2...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> You kill file really doesn't work Carole, does it?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Indeed, I look at the FAA web site where Notices to Pilots are posted
> and there is nothing at all about a no fly zone over the Pole. I also
> looked back at the Notices to Mariners by the USCG, There are no
> Notices on either site about sailing over the North Pole either.
>
> Oh you forgot in the zeal, the Arctic Ocean was completely opening to
> shipping the last two summers with little or no Sea Ice to contend
> with. Well over 100 ships sailing over the North Pole. including
> American, Russian, Japanese and British Naval Ships. I even believe
> the RAN's HMAS Choules sailed "over the top" as a short cut to OZ on
> 2010.
>
> Really Carole, Get a good Grip on reality. Drop the need to believe
> every person which supports your nonsensical ideas. Stop Watching
> Cartoons if you can't tell the difference between a cartoon and
> reality.
>

If you bothered to watch the youtube video, you would have learned
that the compass doesn't work directly over the north pole and so
traffic has to avoid it.

Carole
www.conspiracee.com
"Its pretty hard to keep in touch with reality when you see so little
of it."

George152

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 2:32:03 PM1/29/12
to
Then we have all the nukes that have surfaced at the North Pole since
1953 ..
This large hole must be good if it can retain itself in the middle of
the sea...

tomdzip

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 2:44:33 PM1/29/12
to
> of it."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, I have never heard of going over the North Pole as being any
problem due to compasses not working as they should. Fact is
compasses point to a _magnetic_ north which is not the same as
_polar north_. And even if such was the case, night flights could
rely on True North which is determined by the stars. Maps and
journeys are arranged by making the necessary adjustment
concerning the declination of magnetic north from polar north
and/or grid north. (The last applies to printed maps.)

Tell us what you have heard which prompts you to declare that
compasses don't work over the north pole.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 4:06:16 PM1/29/12
to
On Jan 30, 7:05 am, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:32:03 +1300, in misc.health.alternative,
> Carole lack of knowledge in history, and geology, is almost as
> appalling as her lack of geography, math, chemistry, physiology,
> anatomy and just about every other subject you can think about.
>
> She even built a very silly set of web sites which look like they
> were built by a 8 year old using nearly automated software. a few
> hours study on web design would have benefited her very well.
>
> --
> Bob Officer
> The 1st rule of Usenet, do not commit a typo or misspell a word while flaming someone else for the same offense.
> "And you have been taught admitting you are into "child devolvement"." Carole Hubbard flaming me for a typo, while herself committing a typo.
> Message-ID: <rNmCq.6761$7r4.2...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>

Piss off bob, dumbed down and mind controlled new world order zombie.
* * *

For more information about the hollow earth see http://thehollowearthinsider.com/

There are many more websites but this is a good place to start.
Apparently the north pole is a point in space above the earth as the
poles are somewhat flattened.
There is a magnetic circle surrounding the pole which is quite large
and at any point on that circle shows the north pole. To avoid
confusion any planes or ships traversing the area need to give the
pole a bit of a wide birth and so go around it.

Jack Nelson

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 4:25:26 PM1/29/12
to
On 1/29/2012 12:13 PM, carole wrote:

<snip>

> If you bothered to watch the youtube video, you would have learned
> that the compass doesn't work directly over the north pole and so
> traffic has to avoid it.

DUH!

Jack Nelson

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 4:30:59 PM1/29/12
to
Carole <-- idiot by her own words


> * * *
>
> For more information about the hollow earth see http://thehollowearthinsider.com/
>
> There are many more websites but this is a good place to start.
> Apparently the north pole is a point in space above the earth as the
> poles are somewhat flattened.


Carole, your head has been flattened.


<snip the rest>
Message has been deleted

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 4:46:37 PM1/29/12
to
On Jan 30, 8:37 am, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:

If you weren't such an establishment pawn, you'd have the ability to
think outside the box and your own mental conditioning since
childhood.

All celestial bodies are derived from nebulas.

www.sacred-texts.com/earth/jei/jei05.htm

"THE NEBULA AND ITS EVOLUTION
Probably the most important concept in the whole realm of astronomy is
that of the nebula; for it was only when the idea of the nebula as the
original material of planetary evolution was advanced, that astronomy
could be put upon a really scientific basis. Until the actual genesis
of solar systems and planets could be accounted for in some measure,
astronomy was merely descriptive. The credit for stating the nebular
hypothesis goes to Kant and Laplace, who, however, based their
speculations upon the law of gravity only. Since that day the nebular
hypothesis has undergone many modifications, as actual observation of
the heavens through telescopes and later through photographic means,
to say nothing of our general knowledge of physics, has progressed."

and a quote that bob might find particularly applicable -

"THE DUMB-BELL NEBULA
Professor Ball also describes the nebula which was discovered to be
whirling around the star Nova Persei in 1901 in which the existence of
the nebula was unnoticed until it was illuminated by a burst of light
from the star. But perhaps the most remarkable photograph of a nebula
in his book is that of "The Dumb-Bell Nebula," in which the spherical
character of the nebula with the two large and not well formed
openings at the two ends of a diameter--that is at opposing poles--are
plainly seen. And Professor Ball himself recognises the kinship of
this nebula with that of "The Ring in Lyra" described previously, for
he says:
"It is a striking illustration of the power of photography in
depicting nebula, that it has brought out a distinct resemblance
between the Dumb-Bell in Vulpecula and the Ring in Lyra which could
hardly have been suspected from the visual appearance of these
objects. If we imagine the nebulosity, which exists inside the ring,
to shine a little more brightly, so that it fills up the Ring, and at
the same time imagine the tendency towards thinning out at the ends of
the longest diameter to be a little more pronounced, we shall see how
easily the ring might be transformed into the Dumb-Bell. Both are
gaseous and both have a central star. It is difficult to resist the
conclusion that the two nebula are closely related in kind.""
Message has been deleted

carole

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 6:11:13 PM1/29/12
to
On Jan 30, 9:32 am, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:46:37 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>
> carole <hubbca2...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >On Jan 30, 8:37 am, Bob Officer <*@*.*> wrote:
>
> >If you weren't such an establishment pawn, you'd have the ability to
> >think outside the box and your own mental conditioning since
> >childhood.
>
> >All celestial bodies are derived from nebulas.
>
> >www.sacred-texts.com/earth/jei/jei05.htm
>
> >"THE NEBULA AND ITS EVOLUTION
>
> The subject is taught in 1st year astronomy classes. and has been
> before I took the class in 1969.
>
> Nebula are both the end process and birth place of Stars.
>
> The Ring and Dumbbell nebulas are the last death throws of a Star.
>
> But then if you actually did something beside play at your conspiracy
> nonsense, you might learn something.
>
> >whirling around the star Nova Persei in 1901 in which the existence of
> >the nebula was unnoticed until it was illuminated by a burst of light
>
> Carole, the nebula was discovered in 1764, not 1901.
>
> http://messier.seds.org/m/m027.html
> <cite>
> On July 12, 1764, Charles Messier discovered this new and fascinating
> class of objects, and describes this one as an oval nebula without
> stars. The name "Dumb-bell" goes back to the description by John
> Herschel, who also compared it to a "double-headed shot."
> </cite>
>
> This is sort of like you claim that Quack was a team invented in
> 1900's by AMA? not based in fact, but dogma?
>

Wow!! And all this from the bloke who is into "child devolvement".

"> Remember
> I ran a Residential Summer Camp for Youth. In the State of California
> the law requires continuing education classes in the fields of child
> devolvement, psychology, and counseling to operated any residential
> youth program." -- bob officer

Piss off bob.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Who?

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 7:14:23 PM1/29/12
to
On 1/29/2012 6:11 PM, carole wrote:
> On Jan 30, 9:32 am, Bob Officer<*@*.*> wrote:

<snip>

> Piss off bob.


Carole, you're the one who sniffs stale back alley
urine. If anyone should piss off, that would be you.


Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Joe keane

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 4:06:25 PM1/31/12
to
In article <PYadnR7o8YMuA7jS...@giganews.com>,
George152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>This large hole must be good if it can retain itself in the middle of
>the sea...

Of course, gravity reverses direction there. The water will come up to
the same height as on the other side, but no further.

If not, how could you walk on the land part? Everybody would fall into
the sky!

George152

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 4:31:50 PM1/31/12
to
There's no 'land part' at the geographic North Pole...

0 new messages