52 events 6+ in 30 days! A new attitude is needed!
alexis Sagredo
2011 till
6.0 in Japan, March,13, 2011, (11.37 UTC), we have 52 cases Magn. 6 or
more, included the 8.9 (or 9.1) of the terrible Tsunami in Japan!
That's for our planet.
You know that I have some posts here on statistics. Now I can say
you, that with the Big Tsunami of December 26, 2004 we had 36 events
in 30 days, Magn. 6+, for The Planet, the 9.1 included , and for the
8.8 in Chile, Febr. 27, 2010 it was 35... So, 52 earthquakes , 6+, in
a month for Our Planet is absolutely OUT of LIMITS!
A completely attitude is needed, this Energy is extra Planet. See
also the work
(personal, not official) of Mr. J. H. Shirley, Pasadena, CA.
Alexis Sagredo
CHILE
Weatherlawyer
>
> From the Earthquake 6.8 in the South of my country, CHILE, Febr. 12, 2011 till
> 6.0 in Japan, March,13, 2011, (11.37 UTC), we have 52 cases Magn. 6 or
> more, included the 8.9 (or 9.1) of the terrible Tsunami in Japan!
Conception is the only place that appears regularly on the USGS lists,
nowadays refered to as Bio Bio. (Nice name for a river in a tropical
climate by the way.)
Want to tell us more about the area?
I'd rather read stuff on that than chase up stuff that might be less
informative than my own.
Since the relationship with weather and earthquakws is a constant -
with an almost direct ratio of storm strength to magnitude, a Mag 6 is
only the equivalent of a moderate hurricane.
> You know that I have some posts here on statistics. Now I can tell
> you, that with the Tsunami of December 26, 2004 we had 36 events
> in 30 days, Magn. 6+.
I think it was many more than that but the databases don't return
anything like the NEIC list given in the 7 days recent quakes
bulletins. Pity some fool stopped a newbie here from posting them.
It would have been handy to have them as a reference.
> For 8.8 in Chile, Febr. 27, 2010 it was 35... So, 52 earthquakes , 6+, in
> a month for is absolutely OUT of LIMITS!
There is no limit to the possibilities. I think a lot of it has to do
with deforestation somehow. But that is mere speculation. (Insopired
however so I won't give up on that one.)
What is definite is that they are related to the phenomenon called the
Blocking Highs. Japanese quakes in particular seem to relate to the
anomaly over Britain with severe storms and a predeliction for tremors
on Jan Mayen Island (somewhere between northern Norway and Greenland.)
> A complete change of attitude is needed, this Energy is extra-planetary.
Quite but don't waste your time trying to convince anyone on here they
seem brain dead.
> See the work of J. H. Shirley, Pasadena, CA.
*******
One has to ask why the Japanese were using plutonium in their
reactors.
The safest way to use plutonium in reactors is in submarines parked
over really deep parts of the ocean.
And not even then!
When plutonium is used in civilian plants, the safety margin has
already been crossed.
alexis Sagredo
Michael, thanks for your comments, but ...some limits must be
considered...for instance, 66 6+...?
Concepción, It is not tropical. Usually it is rainy from April to
September. I was a full Professor there
at the Concepción University, for 3 years.
Alexis.
Weatherlawyer
There were 125 quakes of Mag 6 last year earthwide. They come in
spates earth-wide. Several of them in a lunar spell. Then all the
events, large and small, take place in totally different regions as
the cause of the acoustics changes where the static waves focus.
125 M.6+ on something like 65 days
Tropical/subtropical. You have a rainy season. There is thus a
tendency for it to be cyclical.
It's easier to see a five day wave in tropical/subtropical regions.
But they exist in maritime climates like Britain's too. They show up
very well on the North Atlantic charts as sea surface pressure trends.
The Lows coming out of North America tend to split up whilst crossing
that continent. Take a look at the Unisys chart loop on their front
page over a few weeks.
When they leave the USA at Cape Hatteras you get quakes in Chile and
the Aleutians. You should be able to work with that info and increase
your ability to understand what I am saying, accordingly.
When the Lows get to the Mid Atlantic Ridge they build up as a
standing wave. Depending on the type od spell the pressure levels they
need to reach to cross the ridge increases (lowers for Lows builds for
Highs but Highs rarely go past the Azores unless there is a problem in
the system.)
Lows leaving from higher latitudes -Newfoundland usually, tend to
build up south of Iceland -the Icelandic Low. They then go to Norway
unless there is a problem in the system.
Problems in the system result in tornadoes, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions or ... I forget the other one.. Oh yes tropical/subtropical
storms.
That's about all you need to know to work the rest out for yourself.
The "rest" is just a matter of putting the charts against the
activities and proving me correct.
And trying like hell to get someone interested.
Or not, as the case may be.
James and LuAnne Smith
combinations are from the Chile and Japan earthquakes you go from there
to find out?
Weatherlawyer
wrote:
>
> Are you counting from the 1906 earthquake if you are the additional
> combinations are from the Chile and Japan earthquakes you go from there
> to find out?
It's difficult to see who you are referring to or what the person you
are replying to has said if you leave all of their part of the
conversation out of your reply.
It is good to clip any stuff not germane to your reply but the address
in Newgroups usually gets added automatically. If your reader or
browser doesn't allow that you can copy and paste the original message
into yours.
HTH.
Welcome to hell by the way. Have fun.
Mike.
kolldata
AND REMEBER ! for max efficiency, keep used rods in an attic.
WL's weather EQ scope is weather based on core flow.....as a solar
system function...and Orion/B. Dipper prob.....
so where's the dike ?
is there attic space for the diesel generators ?
incroyable, basic power company BS. hmmmm wonder if Google Books has a
power company humor text ?
rick++
probably get the historical average.
alexis Sagredo
> If you dont count all the fore-shocks and after-shocks you will
> probably get the historical average.
Mr. Rick,
I had review all the 6+, from '83, and clearly we have a BIG Change.
Here, Pr. Sergio Barrientos, (uchile.cl), had say that the plates in
Japan are old ones, for so great energy, in the afterschocks.
the NASA could give some importance to the subject and let me to
discuss freely with mr. J.H.Shirley.
Alexis.