mag 6.8+=-
> 2009-03-28 Noon +- a day
Which time zone are you using?
> 41 n +- 1
> 124.9 w +- 1
plus or minus 1 what? degree?
> mag 6.8+=-
plus, equal, or minus? uhmmm, wouldn't that be ANY magnitude?
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
mag 6.8+
I'm still waiting....
--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hat...@cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
>>2009-03-28 Noon +- a day
>>41 n +- 1
>>124.9 w +- 1
>>
>>mag 6.8+=-
>I'm still waiting....
Gee...
Whatever resources you were using the fact that earquakes are wave
trains not sub/ob~duction makes your prediction relevant in that the
stresses involved in the area produced volcanic eruptions along the
lines of a conglomeration of such trains or several days if not
several weeks.
So get into volcanic theories. Especially the relatively new one about
rock stress in certain matrixes being able to produce light.
That may yield results in light of the abilities of sulphur
cyanobacteria. You might hone in on such research if you look for
recent articles online concerning "earthquake lights".
Well done.
Ten Days to go.....
TBerk
somewhere in Northern California
No doubt Cloverdale is in for a big one soon - stay tuned April 23
and nothing for March was of any great size/magnitude. But we
all know a big one is brewing for a summer release.
Maybe May-Day?