Re: One Question. Could the Large Hadron Collider be sabotaging itself from the

Bob Eld

unread,

Oct 30, 2009, 12:37:45 PM10/30/09

to

"Barbara" <pri...@verymuchso.org.uk> wrote in message
news:4p9ke5ho0vfvosib5...@4ax.com...
> One Question. Could the Large Hadron Collider be sabotaging itself from
the
> future, as some physicists say
>
>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/article68792
93.ece
>
> Any ideas on this one.
>
> Babs.

What a lot of unmitigated horse shit complete with uga-booga religious
garbage like a bunch of Neanderthals discussing how many angels can stand on
the head of a pin.

The LHC is difficult science and engineering. It's very large with complex
superconducting magnets and other state of the art mechanisms. The fact that
it has start up problems is par for the course for new work such as this. It
also suffers from the fact that it is a collaboration of a number of
national teams and like other collaborations the right hand may have trouble
understanding what the left hand is doing. The management may be less that
desirable but it is absurd to attribute the problems to super natural even
religious forces.

In the end, the accelerator will work and will peel back another layer on
the onion of particle physics. It will advance the state of that science but
likely will NOT discover any such a thing as a "god particle" or other
metaphysical nonsense. It will generate more questions than it answers as is
always the case because as powerful as it is, it is still orders of
magnitude to puny to delve into the fundamental nature of the universe.

Herschel

unread,

Oct 30, 2009, 12:59:29 PM10/30/09

to

Well said Mr. Sharpton....... babble on dude.
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:37:45 -0800, "Bob Eld" <nsmon...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Steve Terry

unread,

Oct 30, 2009, 4:14:29 PM10/30/09

to

"Bob Eld" <nsmon...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hcf4op$n87$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

>
> "Barbara" <pri...@verymuchso.org.uk> wrote in message
> news:4p9ke5ho0vfvosib5...@4ax.com...
>> One Question. Could the Large Hadron Collider be sabotaging itself from
> the
>> future, as some physicists say
>>
>>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/article68792
> 93.ece
>>
>> Any ideas on this one.
>>
>> Babs.
>
> What a lot of unmitigated horse shit complete with uga-booga religious
> garbage like a bunch of Neanderthals discussing how many angels can stand
> on
> the head of a pin.
>
> The LHC is difficult science and engineering. It's very large with complex
> superconducting magnets and other state of the art mechanisms. The fact
> that
> it has start up problems is par for the course for new work such as this.
> It
> also suffers from the fact that it is a collaboration of a number of
> national teams and like other collaborations the right hand may have
> trouble
> understanding what the left hand is doing. The management may be less that
> desirable but it is absurd to attribute the problems to super natural even
> religious forces.
>
>

Of course it is, everyone knows it's future time travellers from the past
disaster defence force, who are sabotaging the LHC to prevent it ever
producing lack hole stranglets.
In the same way they travelled back to Christmas 1980 to deactivate the
unstable nuclear bomb stockpile at RAF Woodbridge leading to the
UFO Rendlesham Forest incident.

Some people no nufink, UFO's honestly!

Steve Terry