Gore Files Lawsuits Against Time
d....@hotmail.com
by Pat Sajak
Posted: 12/19/2007
Lawyers for former Vice President Al Gore have filed numerous lawsuits
against Time magazine, alleging a series of voting irregularities they
maintain deprived Gore of Time's "Person of the Year" Award. It has
been announced that Russian President Vladimir Putin received the 2007
award, with Gore finishing second.
Details of the suits are sketchy, but one of them accuses certain
unnamed Time employees of denying others the right to vote when it was
determined they were leaning toward Gore. Rumors have surfaced that
one employee, known only as "Chad", has confirmed those rumors.
Another separate suit claims the voting process to be far too
complicated to be understood by, to quote the lawsuit, "a bunch of
journalists." Gore's lawyers are calling for a recount of the ballots
in question. They also demand that independent observers from the
United Nations Commission on Climate Change be allowed access to any
recount procedures.
"Mr. Gore has won an Emmy and an Oscar for his important work, not to
mention a Nobel Peace Prize," said a spokesman for the Vice President.
"They don't even have an Oscar ceremony in Russia. Who ever sees
Russian films anyway?"
Some Gore supporters have accused Republicans of using dirty tricks to
manipulate the results. One close advisor, requesting anonymity,
claimed, "Putin is just the kind of civil-rights-trampling dictator
the GOP loves to see in power. It would be interesting to sit down
with those who voted and find out just how many have been subjected to
Guantanamo-like coercion. Republicans knew Bush wouldn't win, so this
was the next best thing."
So far, there have been no official comments from the White House, the
Kremlin or Time.
Jan Panteltje
d....@hotmail.com wrote in
<05cde2ce-2336-4fca...@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>:
>Gore Files Lawsuits Against Time
>by Pat Sajak
Gore is a egomaniac fraudulent lying nutcase.
Global warming is not man made, but climate change has always been with us.
Gore makes money by selling snake oil solutions, while we
need the money to relocate people, build nuclear power plants,
make dikes higher etc.
Gores head spins like his windmills.
Fran
Amusing troll ... Too funny to be true, regrettably.
Mind you, Putin might have had him killed if Gore had won.
Fran
Bill Penrose
> Mind you, Putin might have had him killed if Gore had won.
The poll isn't for 'nicest guy of the year'.
Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin were once Men of the Year.
Dangerous Bill
Fran
So what's your point?
Fran
Benj
> On a sunny day (Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:47:18 -0800 (PST)) it happened
> d....@hotmail.com wrote in
>
> >Gore Files Lawsuits Against Time
> >by Pat Sajak
>
> Gore is a egomaniac fraudulent lying nutcase.
> Global warming is not man made, but climate change has always been with us.
> Gore makes money by selling snake oil solutions, while we
> need the money to relocate people, build nuclear power plants,
> make dikes higher etc.
> Gores head spins like his windmills.
Come on! A guy that invented the Internet, won an Oscar and Emmy AND
the Nobel Prize? Now THAT is one hell of man! Who cares if CO2
doesn't cause global warming. The important thing is that people DO
SOMETHING. Who cares if it doesn't make sense? And for that we can all
thank Algore and the mainstream media. I wonder why there isn't a
special category in "person of the year" called "what great things
Algore did THIS year".
V-for-Vendicar
"Benj" <bja...@iwaynet.net> wrote
> Who cares if it doesn't make sense?
What doesn't make sense to you? Dung Eater.
V-for-Vendicar
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Gore is a egomaniac fraudulent lying nutcase.
Odd. Here is what some of the scientists he has worked with say about
him....
---
"Far more than other lawmakers, Gore during his career in Washington has
gained a reputation in the science community for being concerned,
knowledgeable, and articulate on matters of science and technology.
Researchers of various disciplines interviewed by The Scientist attest
to this, saying they are impressed that Gore is well versed in
scientific areas as diverse as space science, supercomputing, and
biotechnology." - New Scientist V6 #17.
---
:I think his <Al Gore's> credentials, in terms of science, are probably
better than those of anybody else in the Congress," - Robert Park,
American Physical Society (APS) / professor of physics University of
Maryland, College Park.
---
"I have interacted with him <Al Gore> a number of times, at many
conferences. And he is surely the most knowledgeable major politician in
terms of his actual scientific knowledge." - F. Sherwood Rowland,
tmospheric chemist at the University of California, Irvine / president
of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
---
"On key issues such as the space station, Al Gore actually knows what
he's talking about. He's not just mouthing words that some staff person
wrote for him." - John Pike, space policy project director for the
Federation of American Scientists (FAS) in Washington, D.C.
Jan Panteltje
<Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
<qwjbj.1026$jU1...@read1.cgocable.net>:
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Gore is a egomaniac fraudulent lying nutcase.
>
>Odd. Here is what some of the scientists he has worked with say about
>him....
<snip Gore devotee stuff>
Here is a *real* US Senate report:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb&Issue_id=
Bawana
> On Dec 22, 9:47 am, d....@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > Gore Files Lawsuits Against Time
> > by Pat Sajak
>
> Amusing troll ... Too funny to be true, regrettably.
Fact is funnier than fiction.
Noble Peace Prize?
Oscar?
Man of The Year?
Please...you can't make that shit up.
> Mind you, Putin might have had him killed if Gore had won.
Nah...he might have put a Cobra clutch on alpha-bottom's fat ass,
followed by a Chickenwing arm lock, then hitting him with hidden roll
of coins,
leading to the coup de grace sleeper hold.
Afterwards, they have dinner/drinks, get shit faced, tell jokes about
carbon caps, and hire a couple young boys for dessert.
Power to the people!
V-for-Vendicar
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote>
> Here is a *real* US Senate report:
Ah.. A Inhofe report. About as dishonest as it comes.
Inhofe will be among the first to be executed for his crimes agains nature
and humanity.
Jan Panteltje
<Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
<ZKZbj.4599$fr2....@read2.cgocable.net>:
When time comes, and millions will have to me moved,
and all you have is windmill,
and zero to show for spending zillions to 'stop global warming',
many will die because of lack of funds.
It is only compassion then if the non global warmers save some Gore devotees.
I hope you see, that _even_ if there is a 1 percent effect from human influence,
that when the dikes need to be made 54 centimetre higher, then they would need to be
54.54 cm higher in Gores case.
but Gore will have no money for machines to even make dikes 10 cm higher, as
he will have spend all yours on windmills and other stuff that twill fail to
work at the critical moment.
So it is Gore who should be locked away (assuming being against death penalty for a moment),
to prevent future disaster and bankruptcy happening.
kdt...@yahoo.com
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote>
>
> > Here is a *real* US Senate report:
>
> Ah.. A Inhofe report. About as dishonest as it comes.
>
;> Inhofe will be among the first to be executed for his crimes agains
nature
;> and humanity.
What a great day that will be, with the fascists modern Nazis like
yourself, in charge and exterminating the portions of the population
they deem along with their political opposition.
Now if you only had some scientific basis to your paranoid beliefs.
Fascism means political movements that use radical means against their
political opposition. Liberalism means support of liberilization of
the status quo in favor of the lower classes.
Your are a fascist and an elitist and people should recognize you and
your movement, (from whence you derive your favorite word, 'WE'), for
what it is. And your mere intent to commit holy war against normal and
innocent people according to your insane beliefs in climate
catastrophe.
You state quite clearly here your definite intent to murder a US
senator. One of these days, the complacency of people will end with
the AGW kooks insanity. Then where will you be. Your mamma might kick
you out of the basement, twirp.
KDeatherage
tadchem
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote>
>
> > Here is a *real* US Senate report:
>
> Ah.. A Inhofe report. About as dishonest as it comes.
>
> Inhofe will be among the first to be executed for his crimes agains nature
> and humanity.
Nixon was chastised for simply having an "Enemies List."
Lists of people scheduled for *execution* because they said things
that the "authorities" did not like were a hallmark of the
Totalitarian regimes such as those of Stalin, Hitler, Nero, and the
"Cultural Revolution" in China.
Interesting company you have aligned yourself with.
I had recently suggested (elsewhere) that, to be "fair and balanced,"
the US West Coast needs a 55 meter statue on an island in a prominent
harbor showing a man, to be titled "Authority Commanding the World".
Would you like to pose for the sculptor?
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
V-for-Vendicar
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> When time comes, and millions will have to me moved,
> and all you have is windmill,
Oh, I don't own a windmill. But I do note that windmill's are quite
portable.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> and zero to show for spending zillions to 'stop global warming',
And what economic/engineering analysis to you base your defeatism and
surrender on?
Provide reputable sources.
What we do know is that inaction is more expensive than action.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> many will die because of lack of funds.
Translation: Capitalism will kill many people as it demands payment in
return for their lives.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> I hope you see, that _even_ if there is a 1 percent effect from human
> influence,
> that when the dikes need to be made 54 centimetre higher, then they would
> need to be
> 54.54 cm higher in Gores case.
Oh. You are one of those special idiots that think that AGW has a
natural cause.
Invisible volcanoe's or something.
Jan Panteltje
<Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
<ppsdj.3488$jU1....@read1.cgocable.net>:
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> When time comes, and millions will have to me moved,
>> and all you have is windmill,
>
> Oh, I don't own a windmill. But I do note that windmill's are quite
>portable.
No way, and irrelevant.
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> and zero to show for spending zillions to 'stop global warming',
BECAUSE
>> I hope you see, that _even_ if there is a 1 percent effect from human
>> influence,
>> that when the dikes need to be made 54 centimetre higher, then they would
>> need to be
>> 54.54 cm higher in Gores case.
> Oh. You are one of those special idiots that think that AGW has a
>natural cause.
>
> Invisible volcanoe's or something.
Why are you posting, should not you wait till the doctor allows you to use
the PC?
You missed the point 100% again, if all the equipment to make dikes higher
is in place, and the guys are there to do it, THEN it makes NO difference
if they make dikes 54 or 54.54 cm, costs the same.
But you will not have to money to buy the equipment, hire the workers, as
you will have spend it on your ACTION of investing in the wrong things.
You wrote:
>What we do know is that inaction is more expensive than action.
Well, burning your money on the wrong things is also action,
it is more expensive then not burning it.
So your 'general unproven outcries', and condemnation of capitalism, puts
you right in the troll bin.
V-for-Vendicar
"V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
>> Oh, I don't own a windmill. But I do note that windmill's are quite
>>portable.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> No way, and irrelevant.
Way. They are assembled from prefabricated parts, shipped to a site and
bolted together. Nothing prevents the bolts from beng removed, the parts
separated and it being shipped to a new site.
You need to pour a new cement foundation. Is that what you find
impossible Jan?
"V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
>> Oh. You are one of those special idiots that think that AGW has a
>>natural cause.
>>
>> Invisible volcanoe's or something.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Why are you posting, should not you wait till the doctor allows you to use
> the PC?
How sad that you can't even defend your own Liedeology and immedaiately
revert to off topic personal attacks.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> You missed the point 100% again, if all the equipment to make dikes higher
> is in place, and the guys are there to do it, THEN it makes NO difference
> if they make dikes 54 or 54.54 cm, costs the same.
Well, no it doesn't, the cost is going to be roughly proportional to the
height.
All of the equipment to make levey's was available to the U.S. army core
of engineers working in Louisiana. Lets not forget that Bushie ordered them
to halt construction in the years before Katrina hit.
You know.. That was just after Georgie's brother sold the city huge
emergency water pumps that didn't work
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> But you will not have to money to buy the equipment, hire the workers, as
> you will have spend it on your ACTION of investing in the wrong things.
So in your view if there aren't enough zero's on a piece of paper then you
will have to sit back and do nothing while tens of millions of people die.
Than'x for clearing up your subtext.
Oh.. The cost of inaction is greater than the cost of action.
> You wrote:
> >What we do know is that inaction is more expensive than action.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Well, burning your money on the wrong things is also action,
> it is more expensive then not burning it.
Because as we all know, a pound of cure is less expensive than an ounce of
prevention.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> So your 'general unproven outcries', and condemnation of capitalism, puts
> you right in the troll bin.
And your defense of Capitalism to the point of admitting that you would
allow tens of millions of people die for lack of zero's on a piece of paper,
make you the enemy of mankind, and worthy of immediate execution.
Rich
> "V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
>>> Oh, I don't own a windmill. But I do note that windmill's are quite
>>> portable.
>
>
> "Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> No way, and irrelevant.
>
> Way. They are assembled from prefabricated parts, shipped to a site and
> bolted together. Nothing prevents the bolts from beng removed, the parts
> separated and it being shipped to a new site.
I don't know about that. You ever try and disassemble something old?
There's rust, corrosion, gunk, some parts may be damaged (but not so
badly as to topple the structure), etc... There are many potential
reasons why disassembly may be difficult or impossible and reassembly
may require new parts which may not be available. Building codes also
change and it may not me legal to assemble it somewhere else, one obvious
reason is height.
Cheers,
Rich
Jan Panteltje
<Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
<09ydj.3510$jU1....@read1.cgocable.net>:
>
>"V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
>>> Oh, I don't own a windmill. But I do note that windmill's are quite
>>>portable.
>
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> No way, and irrelevant.
>
> Way. They are assembled from prefabricated parts, shipped to a site and
>bolted together. Nothing prevents the bolts from beng removed, the parts
>separated and it being shipped to a new site.
>
> You need to pour a new cement foundation. Is that what you find
>impossible Jan?
Yea, especially when they are sea based windmill parks, and they _will_ be sea
based, now won't they hey global warmer?
>
>"V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
>>> Invisible volcanoe's or something.
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Why are you posting, should not you wait till the doctor allows you to use
>> the PC?
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> You missed the point 100% again, if all the equipment to make dikes higher
>> is in place, and the guys are there to do it, THEN it makes NO difference
>> if they make dikes 54 or 54.54 cm, costs the same.
>
> Well, no it doesn't, the cost is going to be roughly proportional to the
>height.
No way, the the overhead is the issue, organisation, machines, people.
>All of the equipment to make levey's was available to the U.S. army core
>of engineers working in Louisiana.
Organisation, war in Iraq, failure, could not win, you cannot win
from nature's cycles, foolish to try and shout at the sun, stamp
on the ground to change earth orbit, buy Gore shares.
>Lets not forget that Bushie ordered them
>to halt construction in the years before Katrina hit.
Irrelevant to the subject, and Gore is no dyke builder, just
a snake oil solution salesman.
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> But you will not have to money to buy the equipment, hire the workers, as
>> you will have spend it on your ACTION of investing in the wrong things.
>
> So in your view if there aren't enough zero's on a piece of paper then you
>will have to sit back and do nothing while tens of millions of people die.
You still do not get it, build dikes, move people, have power plants
that work 24/7, not just when there is sun or wind.
Build nu-cu-lear power plants.
> Oh.. The cost of inaction is greater than the cost of action.
>
>
>
>> You wrote:
>> >What we do know is that inaction is more expensive than action.
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Well, burning your money on the wrong things is also action,
>> it is more expensive then not burning it.
>
> Because as we all know, a pound of cure is less expensive than an ounce of
>prevention.
Gore has no cure, his ideas are salesman talk, in fact nature will move on,
eventually the sun will go out, universe will change, and Gore is not that powerful
that he could do anything about it.
He just wants you to buy his snake oil solutions.
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> So your 'general unproven outcries', and condemnation of capitalism, puts
>> you right in the troll bin.
>
> And your defense of Capitalism to the point of admitting that you would
>allow tens of millions of people die for lack of zero's on a piece of paper,
>make you the enemy of mankind, and worthy of immediate execution.
We had a similar situation here, where the environment people did not want higher dikes,
because it looked so bad, and all the work upsets the birds.
Flooding started with high water, a new law was made that overruled evironnuts,
and dikes were made higher.
Guess who had problems first? The environfool on the dike.
His house flooded first.
Have fun. learn to swim.
Benj
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
> > Well, burning your money on the wrong things is also action,
> > it is more expensive then not burning it.
>
> Because as we all know, a pound of cure is less expensive than an ounce of
> prevention.
Does not follow. Money spent on a pound of snake oil is money wasted
that COULD have been used for prevention or even cure!
V-for-Vendicar
"Benj" <bja...@iwaynet.net> wrote
> Does not follow. Money spent on a pound of snake oil is money wasted
> that COULD have been used for prevention or even cure!
Benj: "Dr. Dr. it hurts when I stuff this cucumber up my ass."
Dr. "I advise you to stop pushing cucumbers up your backside."
Benj: "I didn't come here to be sold on snake oil solutions. I'm in pain."
V-for-Vendicar
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Yea, especially when they are sea based windmill parks, and they _will_ be
> sea
> based, now won't they hey global warmer?
Sea based windmill farms are even easier to manage. You just toe them to
another location.
It's not rocket science.
>>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> You missed the point 100% again, if all the equipment to make dikes
>>> higher
>>> is in place, and the guys are there to do it, THEN it makes NO
>>> difference
>>> if they make dikes 54 or 54.54 cm, costs the same.
>>
>> Well, no it doesn't, the cost is going to be roughly proportional to the
>>height.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> No way, the the overhead is the issue, organisation, machines, people.
The people get paid by the hour and the rate of consturction will be the
same hour by hour, hence the people are paid at a rate that is proportional
to the station.
>>All of the equipment to make levey's was available to the U.S. army core
>>of engineers working in Louisiana.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Organisation, war in Iraq, failure, could not win, you cannot win
> from nature's cycles, foolish to try and shout at the sun, stamp
> on the ground to change earth orbit, buy Gore shares.
Can't win from natural cycles? Yet that is what you are suggesting with
your plan to build levy;s to keep the rising ocean at bay.
Dumb.........
>>Lets not forget that Bushie ordered them
>>to halt construction in the years before Katrina hit.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Irrelevant to the subject, and Gore is no dyke builder, just
> a snake oil solution salesman.
It appears to any thinking person that the solution to the problem of
producing too much CO2, is to produce less of it. Just as the solution to
too much alcohol in your belly is to drink less of it.
Perhaps you are too stoned to be able to reason accurately.
>>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> But you will not have to money to buy the equipment, hire the workers,
>>> as
>>> you will have spend it on your ACTION of investing in the wrong things.
>>
>> So in your view if there aren't enough zero's on a piece of paper then
>> you
>>will have to sit back and do nothing while tens of millions of people die.
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> You still do not get it, build dikes, move people, have power plants
> that work 24/7, not just when there is sun or wind.
> Build nu-cu-lear power plants.
How do you intend to build the 200,000 that will be required? How do you
intend to fuel them, and how do you intend to dispose of the waste that will
be produced at a rate that is 1000 times faster than today? In a few months
more waste will be produced than in the entire history of nuclear power to
date.
You gonna open one Yucca sized repository every couple of month for all
eternity?
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Gore has no cure,
Jan "Dr. I want a cure for this watermellon I have stuffed up my snatch."
Dr. "Take the watermellon out of your snatch."
Jan "You have no cure, all you have is snake oil."
V-for-Vendicar
> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>> Way. They are assembled from prefabricated parts, shipped to a site
>> and bolted together. Nothing prevents the bolts from beng removed, the
>> parts separated and it being shipped to a new site.
"Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
> I don't know about that. You ever try and disassemble something old?
> There's rust, corrosion, gunk, some parts may be damaged (but not so
> badly as to topple the structure), etc...
Then you take a grinder and cut the bolts off. and if that doesn't work
then you drill them out, and if you can't do that then you burn them out and
repair the damage at the assembly site.
"Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
> There are many potential reasons why disassembly may be difficult or
> impossible
> and reassembly may require new parts which may not be available.
Then you fabricate new pieces.
"Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
> Building codes also change and it may not me legal to assemble it
> somewhere else, one > obvious reason is height.
How foolish of you to presume that the windmill would be trucked to a site
and erected when doing so violates building codes.
You are doing nothing but making childish excuses.
Trying to fabricate problems where none exist.
Classic Denialism.
Rich
>> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>> Way. They are assembled from prefabricated parts, shipped to a site
>>> and bolted together. Nothing prevents the bolts from beng removed, the
>>> parts separated and it being shipped to a new site.
>
> "Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
>> I don't know about that. You ever try and disassemble something old?
>> There's rust, corrosion, gunk, some parts may be damaged (but not so
>> badly as to topple the structure), etc...
>
> Then you take a grinder and cut the bolts off. and if that doesn't work
> then you drill them out, and if you can't do that then you burn them out and
> repair the damage at the assembly site.
Personally I don't have the tools for it. I did get a nice li-ion electric
screwdriver/drill for Christmas though. It's supposed to hold it's charge
for over a year.
> "Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
>> There are many potential reasons why disassembly may be difficult or
>> impossible
>> and reassembly may require new parts which may not be available.
>
> Then you fabricate new pieces.
Got a machine shop?
> "Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
>> Building codes also change and it may not me legal to assemble it
>> somewhere else, one obvious reason is height.
>
> How foolish of you to presume that the windmill would be trucked to a site
> and erected when doing so violates building codes.
You're proposing moving it, right? Obviously it can't be moved everywhere.
> You are doing nothing but making childish excuses.
No, I'm illustrating the reality of the situation. It may cost less to
replace it than move it. New units may also be more efficient.
> Trying to fabricate problems where none exist.
>
> Classic Denialism.
Whatever you say.
Cheers,
Rich
V-for-Vendicar
> Inhofe will be among the first to be executed for his crimes agains
> nature and humanity.
<kdt...@yahoo.com> wrote
> What a great day that will be, with the fascists modern Nazis like
> yourself, in charge and exterminating the portions of the population
> they deem along with their political opposition.
I predict that Inhofe will have a swift trial, perhaps 15 minutes and then
be lead outside for his public hanging.
We will want these things televised so that everyone will have the
opportunity of seeing the rewards offered those who commit acts of treason
against nature and mankind.
Inhofe will be among the first. But the lists that have been compiled ae
long.
> Your are a fascist and an elitist and people should recognize you and
> your movement
Fascism = Corppratism and that makes the Corporatist KKKonervarive regime
a fascist one.
It's no coincidence that the Bush Failure and the Bush Regime hav such a
vast set of similiarites to Hiter.
> You state quite clearly here your definite intent to murder a US
> senator.
I'll even volunteer to be the hangman.
hanson
wrote in message news:ubxej.4272$jU1....@read1.cgocable.net...
>>> Inhofe will be among the first to be executed for his crimes
>>> agains nature and humanity.
>
>> What a great day that will be, with the fascists modern Nazis like
>> the population they deem along with their political opposition.
>
> I predict that Inhofe will have a swift trial, perhaps 15 minutes and
> then be lead outside for his public hanging.
> We will want these things televised so that everyone will have the
> opportunity of seeing the rewards offered those who commit acts
> of treason against nature and mankind.
> Inhofe will be among the first. But the lists that have been compiled
> ae long.
>
>> You [VD Scotty] are a fascist and an elitist and people should
>> recognize you and your movement.
>
>
[hanson]
ahahaha... VD Scotty is his own elitist and so recognized only
by himself... and his only movement is his bowel movement.
>
Scotty listen, go oil your bicycle and stop talking such nonsense.
Remind yourself of and change your despicable existence which
you, the 60+ years old VD Scotty, has bragged about in:
< http://groups.google.com/group/aus.invest/msg/f567aeaabb7d77b8 >
:VD: I have never driven a car ...., although last summer I did
:VD: purchase... a small bicycle.. to leave the area I am in...
:VD: In addition a 33m climb and 15% grades there are no bike
:VD: lanes on any of the access roads... making travel unsafe.
>
ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahahaha....
Happy New Year to you and thanks for the laughs... ahahanson
>
>
VD Scotty wrote to Kent:
> Fascism = Corppratism and that makes the Corporatist KKKonervarive regime
> a fascist one.
> It's no coincidence that the Bush Failure and the Bush Regime hav such a
> vast set of similiarites to Hiter.
>
>> You state quite clearly here your definite intent to murder a US senator.
>
V-for-Vendicar
>> Then you take a grinder and cut the bolts off. and if that doesn't work
>> then you drill them out, and if you can't do that then you burn them out
>> and repair the damage at the assembly site.
"Rich" <som...@someplace.not> wrote
> Personally I don't have the tools for it.
Or the brains, or the balls.
You are one useless Mother Fucker.