The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: sci.environment
From: "Tim O'Flaherty" <pinwhe...@attcanada.net>
Date: 2000/04/03
Subject: Re: $Windpower-Energy Storage$
ant wrote in message ... There is good info on Vanadium here: >thanks for the links on the redox storage, this will be fun to see the >replys from the pro-nuclear ones. i really cant see why so many people seem >to have such a problem with the true renewable energy sources, electric >cars are more reliable and simpler to service, with vanadium electolyte >cells recharging is fast and neat. all that is required is sufficent >capital to start the transition, it would be no more complex then the >changge to unleaded or the installation of LPG filling facilitys, probably >wold not cost as much as there is no risk of fire with electrolyte spills. >wonder what its toxicity is like as some escape into the environment is >unavoidable, electric car crashes rupturing fuel tanks and so on. >ant It is toxic in high concentrations but is not considered a carcinogen and is -- Assuming a 20% Capacity factor, Regards , Tim O'Flaherty You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||