Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.econ, sci.environment
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Nov 2 2012 5:43 pm
Subject: Republican Party is anti-science and thus anti-USA #603 Optimal Strategy of Playing the StockMarket via VonNeumann Game Theory
On Nov 2, 1:02 am, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:I promised myself to stay out of politics for the 2012 election but
> Seems to me, everytime Mayor Bloomberg of New York City gets up to say
> something about a problem, the more and more I like the man. And this
> year I heard really two good speaking events in this presidential
> election. One I heard a logical speech by Bill Clinton at the
> convention and now, second I hear why Obama deserves the presidency,
> because Mayor Bloomberg put the finger on the best reason for voting
> for Obama and not Romney. The decision should be based on science, and
> which candidate is in tune with science, for that is the best truth
> and the best way of facing the future. Obama realizes Global Warming
> is true and has done a lot for the environment. Romney has done
> nothing for the environment and his push to dirty fuel and jobs jobs
> jobs, drill drill drill bodes disaster for the environment.
> So I hope people take the advice of Bloomberg's endorsement and elect
> Our politicians should be on the side of science and if a party is
> Now this campaign year has been constant talk about jobs jobs jobs,
> I hope Mayor Bloomberg runs for presidency in 2016 for he has a good
> Portfolio of PAF on 1NOV2012
> total share-wealth-units last reported which was 17SEP2012 was
> With extra cash today I bought 250 more shares of AT&T at 34.95 and
> But before then, I would like to see the telecoms be able to put a
the endorsement of Mayor Bloomberg makes it irresistable for me to add
my own opinions.
Now mind you, Mitt Romney is a good man, but it is his Party that is
No-one can deny that the USA is #1 in the world and it achieved it via
But if you look at the two political parties of the USA, here, today,
So by voting for Democrats in 2012 is a vote that recognizes that the
The Republican Party, if it were in office for the next 100 years
A vote for Republicans is a vote for leaders who fail to see the
What Mayor Bloomberg expressed with his endorsement of the Democratic
A vote for Republicans in 2012 is a irresponsible vote.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.