Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
sci.environment
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Republican Party is anti-science and thus anti-USA #603 Optimal Strategy of Playing the StockMarket via VonNeumann Game Theory
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Archimedes Plutonium  
View profile  
 More options Nov 2 2012, 5:43 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.econ, sci.environment
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Nov 2 2012 5:43 pm
Subject: Republican Party is anti-science and thus anti-USA #603 Optimal Strategy of Playing the StockMarket via VonNeumann Game Theory
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Nov 2, 1:02 am, Archimedes Plutonium

<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems to me, everytime Mayor Bloomberg of New York City gets up to say
> something about a problem, the more and more I like the man. And this
> year I heard really two good speaking events in this presidential
> election. One I heard a logical speech by Bill Clinton at the
> convention and now, second I hear why Obama deserves the presidency,
> because Mayor Bloomberg put the finger on the best reason for voting
> for Obama and not Romney. The decision should be based on science, and
> which candidate is  in tune with science, for that is the best truth
> and the best way of facing the future. Obama realizes Global Warming
> is true and has done a lot for the environment. Romney has done
> nothing for the environment and his push to dirty fuel and jobs jobs
> jobs, drill drill drill bodes disaster for the environment.

> So I hope people take the advice of Bloomberg's endorsement and elect
> the Democrats to office.

> Our politicians should be on the side of science and if a party is
> anti-science, it means a poor and harmful administration.

> Now this campaign year has been constant talk about jobs jobs jobs,
> but what if you employed everyone, yet you have a hell of an
> environment, such as the washed out New Jersey state.

> I hope Mayor Bloomberg runs for presidency in 2016 for he has a good
> understanding of what our future is heading for, and probably because
> he was a electrical engineer in training, something that probably
> makes him, in my opinion, overqualified to be president compared to
> most of the past presidents of the USA.

> Portfolio of PAF on 1NOV2012
> VZ     2,000
> T      21,850

> total share-wealth-units last reported which was 17SEP2012 was
> 23,600 
and 
total share-wealth-units today 23,850
> real-estate land 3APR03 of 3 lots $19,000.
> real-estate land 30JUL03 another lot $11,500.
> real-estate land Sept05 another lot $75,000.

> With extra cash today I bought 250 more shares of AT&T at 34.95 and
> surprised to see the price of T is cheaper than when I sold some in 17
> SEP when T was 37.49. I guess the sales of cell phones is slowing down
> in telecoms. Now I think what will really
> boost the sales of the telecoms is when they can get TV on a ipad that
> is comparable to the TV on the TV box.

> But before then, I would like to see the telecoms be able to put a
> phone on the ipad, because I do not like to look at a tiny box of the
> cellphone. I like my phone to be the size of the ipad. So that if they
> packed the ipad with a phone, would boost the sales of the telecoms to
> provide those ipad telephones.

I promised myself to stay out of politics for the 2012 election but
the endorsement of Mayor Bloomberg makes it irresistable for me to add
my own opinions.

Now mind you, Mitt Romney is a good man, but it is his Party that is
foul and bad for the country.

No-one can deny that the USA is #1 in the world and it achieved it via
technology. Technology is science and the reason the USSR never became
#1 was because their science was never as good as our science/
technology. The Cold War was won because the USA had superior science.

But if you look at the two political parties of the USA, here, today,
you see that one party, the Republicans are so anti-science that they
do not deserve a single vote. The Republican Party has spent the past
20 years denying Global Warming and has made a party mandate that
Republicans are opposed to doing anything about Global Warming. You
see it in biology, where recently a Missouri Republican said that
women's anatomy has a way of shutting down a pregnancy, and in Indiana
another Republican said words to the effect that "God causes women to
be raped". You see it in Romney's statements that coal is clean, yet
every scientist knows there is no "clean coal". You see it in the fact
that other countries who are not anti-science are moving ahead and
forward such as Germany is the world's largest solar powered country,
and not because Germany has a sunny climate, but because the
politicians and people of Germany are far smarter than the Republican
Party of the USA.

So by voting for Democrats in 2012 is a vote that recognizes that the
truth and reality of the world is science based and it is through
science that we can hope to solve those problems. A vote for
Republicans is a vote for anti-science and a degeneration of the USA,
a sending of the USA into decay.

The Republican Party, if it were in office for the next 100 years
would mean that biology would eliminate Darwin Evolution, that New
York City would be permanently under water due to sea level rise while
the Republicans keep denying the reality of Global Warming.

A vote for Republicans is a vote for leaders who fail to see the
reality of the world and that is dangerous for it leads our country
into decay.

What Mayor Bloomberg expressed with his endorsement of the Democratic
Party, is an expression that at least the Democratic Party sees the
reality of the world for what it truly is, and with the hope that
science can make technology to solve such issues as Global Warming,
human overpopulation, animal plant extinctions, droughts, etc etc

A vote for Republicans in 2012 is a irresponsible vote.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google