Received: by 10.68.211.136 with SMTP id nc8mr14108571pbc.6.1335818717385;
        Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni117082pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!21g2000vbh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,sci.physics,sci.environment
Subject: Re: April looking potentially, globally, warmer.
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <f59ca557-8435-4ee1-ae19-bab245bc51f9@21g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
References: <6b3c2a01-beb5-4bda-8d31-b625b8cbf183@v2g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
 <jnb45n$ib2$1@dont-email.me> <29blp7tbt4p6pkts3qv7buut6aip2v4b3f@4ax.com>
 <2676ae6c-b403-4d5e-9ab0-3c8f5524a7fc@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>
 <10ulp75ufk7v5sr1c1veiocb8ap6sbestt@4ax.com> <8caad682-0b00-4bfe-a753-f763bdd656e5@f5g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <f6dfb8fb-2932-494e-890d-84dcae8883d4@g38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <hc9rp7dnmft71kt7ako9s4kp33d277ink1@4ax.com> <jnlb1b$eg2$1@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.111.14.145
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335818717 10162 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2012 20:45:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:45:17 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 21g2000vbh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.111.14.145; posting-account=usX-MAoAAACICaMkl-EkxzA1zuYSQ4uB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1;
 Trident/5.0; GTB7.3),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 30, 7:21=A0am, "Peter Webb" <r.peter.webb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "AGWFacts" <AGWFa...@1800reality.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hc9rp7dnmft71kt7ako9s4kp33d277ink1@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:18:53 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish
> > <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Apr 27, 9:25 pm, Transition Zone <mogu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Apr 27, 3:49 pm, AGWFacts <AGWFa...@1800reality.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:33:42 -0700 (PDT), Tunderbar
>
> >> > > <tdcom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > On Apr 27, 9:29 am, AGWFacts <AGWFa...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:23:02 +0200, SunDancer
>
> >> > > > > <nob...@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > > > > Dawlish wrote :
> >> > > > > > >http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemp=
s+002
> >> > > > > > > Looks like it could be warmer than last year and last year
> >> > > > > > > was in the
> >> > > > > > > top 10 warmest Aprils on record.
> >> > > > > > Thanks for the weather report, it is appreciated!
> >> > > > > Global average temperature is "weather" now? LOL!
> >> > > > a two year "trend" is not climate, it's weather
>
> >> > > You mean 133-year trend. We have instrument records going back
> >> > > that far.
>
> >> > Something's telling me that these deniers couldn't care less about t=
he
> >> > figures..
>
> >> We agree. Deniers just turn their visor up to "deny everything" when
> >> presented with the temperature record as a whole and explanations of
> >> why noise can mask the warming signal in the short-term. They would
> >> much rather try to convince scientists that, because 1998 was
> >> anomalously warm, GW has therefore stopped and the earth is therefore
> >> cooling.
>
> >> Easy really.
>
> > Indeed, but year 2010 was anomalously warmer than year 1998, yet
> > the hysterical alarmist nutters still insistglobal warming stopped
> > in year 1998. WTF?
>
> Ummm ... who was that?
>
> Or are you inventing people who hold opinions you disagree with, so you c=
an
> say the imaginary people are wrong, and when they don't respond you can
> claim that you know more than an imaginary person you invented?
>
>
>
>
>
> > --
> > Denialism: "The employment of rhetorical arguments to give the appearan=
ce
> > of legitimate debate where there is none."

April is looking, globally, warmer than was March and the anomaly
looks to be larger. Do you disagree with the likelihood of that,
denier webby? If so; explain.