Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Alarm grows over big melt in Antarctica

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Claudius Denk

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 12:11:02 PM7/5/09
to
On Jul 3, 7:44 pm, Bob Lee Swagger <l...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/science/news/article.cfm?c_id=82&objectid=1...
>
> Antarctica is shrinking more quickly than expected and the pace is
> increasing, a conference has been told.
>
> Professor Peter Barrett of Victoria University's Antarctic Research Centre
> summarised the latest findings at the Annual Antarctic Conference.
>
> Recent satellite pictures showed the frozen continent was calving glaciers
> from its edges at a rate adding up to about 0.4mm of sea-level rise a year.
>
> That might not sound like much, he said, but the rate of ice loss was
> increasing quickly - up 75 per cent since 1996.
>
> The Antarctic ice sheet has been stable for a million years and until
> recently had seemed too large and too cold to be vulnerable.
>
> But Dr Barrett said scientists now believed it could change significantly
> in a matter of decades. A new assessment adding up global ice loss from
> Greenland, Antarctica and other glaciers suggested sea levels would rise
> between 80cm and 2m by 2100, he said.

This reminds me of people that claim to be able to see the virgin
mary's image on a stain on a tree trunk. Dr. Barrett has special
abilities. He should build a small shrine in his community where
people can come visit him and leave science to scientists.


leona...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 5:34:11 PM7/5/09
to

> On Jul 3, 7:44 pm, Bob Lee Swagger <l...@nospam.invalid> wrote:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/science/news/article.cfm?c_id=82&objectid=1...

> > But Dr Barrett said scientists now believed it could change significantly


> > in a matter of decades. A new assessment adding up global ice loss from
> > Greenland, Antarctica and other glaciers suggested sea levels would rise
> > between 80cm and 2m by 2100, he said.
>

•• How is it that these so called scientists sit in front
of their computers and make stupid predictions
unsupported by real science.

•• Of course that is for what they are being paid.

- -
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages