(Scott Nudds) wrote:: >Dimwits often doubt if there is a greenhouse effect, but the fact
: >that the earth is not locked in a perpetual ice age, tells us that
: >thinking people there is one.
: >What does this fact tell denialist Khnum?
: >Dimwits often doubt if the globe has warmed, but direct measurement
: >tells us that it has.
: in 1459 ad? 1025ad? 2000bce? 3500bce?
: 8500bce? 10500bce? 25000bce? 100,000bce?
: 150,000bce? 250000bce? 500,000bce?
Dimwits often attempt to argue that since there was climate change in
: >Please do. How do you conclude that the observed warming trend shows
I have. Please answer the question, or admit that you can not.
: > If it is, then the climate is significantly more sensitive than
: on your point to further prove your illogic. It would make sense that
: the climate is less sensative, and less responsive to the activities of
Your claim was that the observed warming trend shows that we are at
If you are correct. Then we most certainly should stop increasing
: >Yes, it's such arrogance to think that after years of life, one can
It means that you are scientifically illiterate.
: >You've drank tens of thousands of liters of water in your lifetime.
It's rather obvious.
: >And now the Conservative attacks Government and University Science.
: of the govt and burn books. What's this about?
My reference to conservatives burning books was well timed. Today I read...
Conservative Bishop orders bonfire of books
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.