The Law Of The Universe
jdawe
Energy
or
Matter
There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:
In Motion
or
At Rest
When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates positive force
( gravity ).
When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates negative force
( inverse of gravity ).
-------------------------------------------------------
Understand that law and you will understand everything in this
physical universe.
-Josh.
dlzc
On Oct 20, 8:55 pm, jdawe <jd...@ncable.com.au> wrote:
> There are only 2 things in this universe:
>
> Energy
>
> or
>
> Matter
Space, time, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, momentum, entropy. You have no
clue, do you?
> There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:
>
> In Motion
>
> or
>
> At Rest
These two are the same. 0 is just another value for Motion. Try not
to be silly.
> When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates
> positive force ( gravity ).
>
> When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates
> negative force ( inverse of gravity ).
How can we disprove this? Since I am at rest wrt the Earth, then
there is no gravitation on me?
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Understand that law and you will understand
> everything in this physical universe.
Law #1: Idiots post anything to usenet, post it to inappropriate
newsgroups, never respond in group, and post in vague generalities
being sure to say nothing of import.
David A. Smith
dlzc
> There are only 2 things in this universe:
>
> Energy
>
> or
>
> Matter
>
>
> In Motion
>
> or
>
> At Rest
>
> ( gravity ).
>
> When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates negative force
> ( inverse of gravity ).
>
>
> Understand that law and you will understand everything in this
> physical universe.
>
We have a new BURT, one that does not realize he / she can post to
more than one group at a time. So it spams the same empty-headed crap
both here and sci.engr.mech.
David A. Smith
jdawe
I have some homework for you to do:
The energy\matter of the star ( our sun ) is 'At Rest' it generates
negative gravity.
The energy\matter of the planets ( including our earth ) are 'In
Motion' they generate positive gravity.
Using the Law Of The Universe see if you can tell me:
Why the sun is composed of more energy than matter?
and
Why the planets are composed of more matter than energy?
> David A. Smith- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
jdawe
The answer is:
The star 'At Rest' is slowly inverting all the energy of the planets
into matter.
The planets 'In Motion' are slowly inverting all the matter of the
star into energy.
-Josh
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Paul O
> David,
>
> I have some homework for you to do:
>
> The energy\matter of the star ( our sun ) is 'At Rest' it generates
> negative gravity.
>
> The energy\matter of the planets ( including our earth ) are 'In
> Motion' they generate positive gravity.
>
> Using the Law Of The Universe see if you can tell me:
>
> Why the sun is composed of more energy than matter?
>
> and
>
> Why the planets are composed of more matter than energy?
>
>
Here is some homework for you...
Our local star (our sun) is in Motion as it orbits around the center of
our galaxy.
Our galaxy is in motion in in relation to the other galaxies in our
local group.
Our local group is in motion in relation to our Local Supercluster of
galaxies (surrounding the Virgo Cluster)
Ponder....
--
Paul D Oosterhout
I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)
Androcles
"Paul O" <first....@company.com> wrote in message
news:4ADF122D...@company.com...
Ok, pondered.
Conclusion... nothing I can do about it, it doesn't change my life.
Some simple facts about climate.
Negative feedback:
1) Sun heats ocean.
2) Ocean evaporates.
3) Clouds reflect sunlight into space, reduce evaporation.
4) Less cloud forms, more heat is absorbed, more cloud forms,
less heat is absorbed; Earth's temperature remains constant.
If it gets warmer, it will cool. If it gets cooler, it will
warm.
Positive feedback:
5) Snow falls on land and polar ice.
6) Snow/ice reflect sunlight into space, reduce heat absorption.
7) Earth cools as it radiates heat to space, more snow falls,
more sunlight is reflected, result is an Ice Age. The colder
it is, the colder it will get. The warmer it is, the warmer
it will get.
Changing the balance:
8) Earth's orbit is elliptical.
9) Sunlight obeys the inverse square law.
10) Earth is tilted.
11) More sunlight reaches Earth at perihelion than at aphelion.
12) Earth's Great White Spot, Antarctica, reflects sunlight at
aphelion (Southern summer). Result, positive feedback
predominates, Ice Age.
13) Earth precesses. Earth's Great White Spot reflects sunlight
at perihelion (Northern summer). But Earth's Great White Spot
has no sunlight to reflect and the Northern Wet Spot (the Arctic
Ocean) has even more sunlight to melt its ice cap than it had
when it faced the Sun at aphelion. Water absorbs far more heat
than ice. Result: more sunlight absorbed, positive feedback,
global warming.
14) But it is offset by more cloud, see negative feedback above.
Overall result - a small change in temperature as a function of
precession.
15) CO2 levels rise as a consequence of a warmer planet, not
as the cause. Far more strange gases are vented to atmosphere by
volcanoes than by man.
Ponder...
dlzc
On Oct 20, 9:18 pm, jdawe <jd...@ncable.com.au> wrote:
> David,
>
> I have some homework for you to do:
>
> The energy\matter of the star ( our sun )
> is 'At Rest' it generates negative gravity.
It is never at rest. It swallows comets. The Sun loses atmosphere,
just like the Earth does.
> The energy\matter of the planets ( including
> our earth ) are 'In Motion' they generate
> positive gravity.
Which is why we lose atmosphere, and why the Moon is receding from
Earth?
> Using the Law Of The Universe see if
> you can tell me:
That law seems to be that silly people seem to also post to usenet.
> Why the sun is composed of more energy
> than matter?
Since matter *is* energy, what sense have you made?
> and
>
> Why the planets are composed of more matter
> than energy?
Please place your brains back in your head. When you take them out
like this, you just get them dirty.
David A. Smith
dlzc
> There are only 2 things in this universe:
Those that think before writing, and those that regret after writing.
Usenet posts are archived for years, and for discussion of news in the
appropriate context, and can be used to weed out candidates for jobs.
You are painting yourself into a corner, exposing your ignorance. Are
you sure you need to go there?
David A. Smith
jdawe
physical universe not just the big questions but small everyday
things.
For example:
A human = matter\energy.
When a human is 'In Motion' ( going for a walk ) the negative gravity
of the star will begin inverting the energy in the human into matter.
When a human is 'At Rest' ( asleep in bed ) the positive gravity of
the planets will begin inverting the matter in the human into energy.
So,
if you need more energy have a rest!
if you need more matter ( bigger muscles ) go for a walk!
When a human consumes energy\matter in the form of food the 'In
Motion' state of the digestive system uses the negative gravity of the
star to:
First invert as much energy in the food into matter.
When the digested matter settles, 'At Rest' in your stomach, the
positive gravity of the planets will begin to invert the digested
matter into energy.
So, after you've eaten make sure you have a good rest and let your
food fully invert into energy before commencing physical activity.
-----------------------------
The law is the most powerful law ever given to humankind.
The question now is will humankind accept it or try to cover it up?
-Josh.
jdawe
>
> Our local star (our sun) is in Motion as it orbits around the center of
> our galaxy.
>
> Our galaxy is in motion in in relation to the other galaxies in our
> local group.
>
> Our local group is in motion in relation to our Local Supercluster of
> galaxies (surrounding the Virgo Cluster)
>
> Ponder....
>
>
> Paul D Oosterhout
> I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)
>
>
>
Using the Law Of The Universe I will solve it as follows:
The planets are 'in motion' *IN* the solar system producing positive
gravity. The sun is 'at rest' *IN* the solar system producing negative
gravity.
Outside of that, the solar system is 'In Motion' *IN* a galaxy
producing positive gravity. The galactic centre of a a galaxy is 'At
Rest' *IN* a galaxy producing negative gravity.
Outside of that the galaxies as a whole are 'in motion' *IN* the local
group producing positive gravity. The centre of the local group is 'At
Rest' *IN* a local group producing negative gravity.
and so on and so on..
-Josh.
jdawe
E = MC2
into:
E = ~M
M = ~E
Where m is matter not mass. Mass is a term for a 'thing' of matter
\energy.
To invert energy into matter you use negative gravity ( the gravity of
the star ).
To invert matter into energy you use positive gravity ( the gravity of
the planets ).
-Josh.
jdawe
Forgot to mention:
To use negative gravity to invert energy into matter set the energy
'In Motion'.
To use positive gravity to invert matter into energy set the matter
'At Rest'.
-Josh.
.
jdawe
I have explained everything to the best of my ability.
If someone wants specific help with applying the law to your field of
research contact me and I will be happy to help.
Understand I will help anybody - you do not have to work for some well
known organisation. As long as you send your questions in a polite and
logical manner.
Thank you,
Joshua Dawe
By phone:
By email:
jdawe (AT) ncable.com.au
By mail:
JDawe
PO Box 417
Strawberry Hills
NSW 2012
Australia
Any sort of abusive or threatening correspondence received will be
referred immediately to the appropriate law enforcement agency in the
country of origin.
Paul O
I am curious as to why you decided to strike out on your own and develop
an original Theory of the Universe instead of starting with the basics -
Newton, Faraday, Kelvin, Maxwell, Lorentz, Plank, Einstein, Fermi,
Feynman, Bethe, Chandrasekhar, etc. - and build on their work?
brian whatcott
>> [about] jdawe (AT) ncable.com.au
>>
...
> I am curious as to why you decided to strike out on your own and develop
> an original Theory of the Universe instead of starting with the basics -
> Newton, Faraday, Kelvin, Maxwell, Lorentz, Plank, Einstein, Fermi,
> Feynman, Bethe, Chandrasekhar, etc. - and build on their work?
>
I have come across a few people in this same class. One person, very
very sincere, who built a track for a toy car with magnets imbedded in
it, that visibly would run up hill (under the influence of magnets
imbedded each side of the track) run down the other side and on around
and make it back to the foot of the original upslope. (Almost! At the
foot of the slope, there was a boundary of magnetic repulsion that the
car had to be pushed through, before it would start running up hill)
He was certain that a little more effort, and he would have a toy car
that would circle the track indefinitely.
You could SEE it climbing up hill with no external power expended, after
all! I found this kind of enthusiast forgivable: you could see how
he got to his position...
Then there are the folks who have been abducted by aliens - the
folks who have seen a flying saucer, - the folks who hear voices....
But I suspect that Mr Dawe feels deep down that he has insights that not
many people get - he feels special so he enjoys being treated as special.
And I expect he has not been burdened by much college education in this
area. Once you accept some Conservation rules: energy/matter, charge,
momentum, it takes all the fun out of building on fanciful concepts.
They are knocked out in the first or second semester.
Brian W
jdawe
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi Paul,
Sorry for the late reply I've been away on bit of a break.
I came across to physics from another discipline - I never set out
specifically to find the 'Law Of The Universe'.
It just so happened that if I was going to excel at the other
discipline then I had to understand the underlying, physical laws of
nature. So I went on bit of a journey of scientific discovery.
I began unearthing little 'laws'. Each one of these little laws all
had one unique thing in common - there were always 2 'ways' of doing
something. A 'way' and it's equal and opposite 'way'. I learnt this
from the Chinese theory of 'yin\yang'.
I really got quite absorbed in it. All day and night all I could ever
do was think, think and think. I just couldn't stop thinking about it.
I knew I was headed for a bit of a breakdown if I didn't stop thinking
and take a break from it but the more little laws I uncovered the
greater the desire there was to uncover more and more and more.
I kept pushing it, of course, until I spilled over completely from the
other discipline here to pure physics where I continued my thinking
unabated.
Then, finally, I hit the almighty jackpot.
Discovering something Einstein, Newton and everyone else you listed
had been searching for. The 'Law Of The Universe'.
Now, many in the pure scientific community will probably take some
time before they accept it because they have made one very big mistake
in their own journey of scientific discovery. They have tried to
impose a one sided view on a two sided universe.
So long as they continue to maintain that there is only 'one' state
energy\matter can be in - the moving state.
Recognising only 'one' state of motion gives you only one form of
gravity and understanding only one form of gravity means you will
never truly understand the dual 'way' of the universe.
You will be stuck using 'vacuums' for your scientific research with
all the energy\matter removed so you can live in a mythical universe
of no positive or negative gravity.
Now, as to whether or not I feel special, as Brian alluded to, well,
there's a feeling of achievement there just as an athlete feels he has
achieved something by breaking a world record. All the effort they
have put, day in and day out, into their training has finally paid
off. So, in my case, all those sleepness nights of endless thinking,
thinking and thinking finally paid off in the end.
So at last, I can finally switch the 'In Motion' state of my mind into
the 'At Rest' state and finally get a good nights sleep for once.
-Josh.
Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
The Lever
brian whatcott
>>> That's all I will be posting in these science groups.
You then continued with this....
>...
> It just so happened that if I was going to excel at the other
> discipline then I had to understand the underlying, physical laws of
> nature. So I went on bit of a journey of scientific discovery.
> So at last, I can finally switch the 'In Motion' state of my mind into
> the 'At Rest' state and finally get a good nights sleep for once.
>
> -Josh.
Please....
Brian W
jdawe
back humanity to keep one's own intellectual ego intact.
-Josh.
dlzc
And there is nothing funnier to behold than:
"delusions of competence"
Rather than answer the questions raised, or even being remotely aware
of the geniuses that support your lifestyle, you blather on like your
cocaine dream meant anything to anyone but you.
Please enjoy your life. You have done nothing for anyone here, except
waste bandwidth and record your inanities for posterity. Like so many
have done in the decade I have been watching.
Newsgroups are for discussing news. You neither deliver news, nor do
you discuss.
David A. Smith
BURT
If you violate me you are violating the universe.
Mitch Raemsch
dlzc
On Oct 31, 3:51 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
> If you violate me you are violating the universe.
You violate the Universe. You shame the Universe. You embarrass the
Universe. You denigrate the Universe. You limit the Universe. It is
much bigger than you. If you'd stop posting and listen to the
Universe, She would teach you some things about grace.
David A. Smith
BURT
>
> - Show quoted text -
God is doing part of gravity. It is a space push.
Mitch Raemsch
jdawe
only 2 things in the universe then what's gravity?" so I've changed
part of the wording to make it easier to understand.
There are only 2 physical things in this universe:
Energy
or
Matter
There are only 2 physical states those physical 2 things can be in:
In Motion
or
At Rest
When energy\matter is 'In Motion' it generates positive physical
attraction.
When energy\matter is 'At Rest' it generates negative physical
attraction.
-Josh.
BURT
Einstein talked about no absolute rest for energy josh.
Mitch Raemsch
jdawe
>
> - Show quoted text -
There is no absolute motion either.
Just 2 opposing states:
In Motion
or
At Rest
-Josh.
Magnetic
In a dozen of days CERN’s LHC will kill all of you and all of your
relatives.
Take action, to save your souls!
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7e292b42c079aa35?hl=en#
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html
Magnetic
> Idiots, what are you discussing now?
> In a dozen of days CERN’s LHC will kill all of you and all of your
> relatives.
> Take action, to save your souls!
>
The main law of the Universe is The Law of Civilizations Reproduction.
CERN is already ready to do that.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html