Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device
2 views
Skip to first unread message
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
May 20, 2013, 1:29:10 PM5/20/13
to
Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
reactor device
Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbj�ｿｽrn Hartman, Bo
H�ｿｽistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegn�ｿｽr, Hanno Ess�ｿｽn
(Submitted on 16 May 2013)
An experimental investigation of possible anomalous heat
production in a special type of reactor tube named E-Cat
HT is carried out. The reactor tube is charged with a
small amount of hydrogen loaded nickel powder plus some
additives. The reaction is primarily initiated by heat
from resistor coils inside the reactor tube. Measurement
of the produced heat was performed with high-resolution
thermal imaging cameras, recording data every second from
the hot reactor tube. The measurements of electrical
power input were performed with a large bandwidth three-
phase power analyzer. Data were collected in two
experimental runs lasting 96 and 116 hours, respectively.
An anomalous heat production was indicated in both
experiments. The 116-hour experiment also included a
calibration of the experimental set-up without the active
charge present in the E-Cat HT. In this case, no extra
heat was generated beyond the expected heat from the
electric input. Computed volumetric and gravimetric
energy densities were found to be far above those of any
known chemical source. Even by the most conservative
assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the
result is still one order of magnitude greater than
conventional energy sources.
Comments - 29 pages, 15 figues, plus plots and diagrams
Subjects - General Physics (physics.gen-ph)
Cite�ｿｽas - arXiv:1305.3913 [physics.gen-ph] (or
arXiv:1305.3913v1 [physics.gen-ph] for this version)
Conclusions
The two test measurements described in this text were
conducted with the same methodology on two different
devices: a first prototype, termed E-Cat HT, and a second
one, resulting from technological improvements on the
first, termed E-Cat HT2. Both have indicated heat
production from an unknown reaction primed by heat from
resistor coils. The results obtained indicate that energy
was produced in decidedly higher quantities than what may
be gained from any conventional source. In the March
test, about 62 net kWh were produced, with a consumption
of about 33 kWh, a power density of about 5.3 �ｿｽ 10^5, and
a density of thermal energy of about 6.1 �ｿｽ 10^7Wh/kg. In
the December test, about 160 net kWh were produced, with
a consumption of 35 kWh, a power density of about 7 �ｿｽ
10^3W/kg and a thermal energy density of about 6.8 �ｿｽ
10^5Wh/kg. The difference in results between the two
tests may be seen in the overestimation of the weight of
the charge in the first test (which was comprehensive of
the weight of the two metal caps sealing the cylinder),
and in the manufacturer�ｿｽs choice of keeping temperatures
under control in the second experiment to enhance the
stability of the operating cycle. In any event, the
results obtained place both devices several orders of
magnitude outside the
Even from the standpoint of a �ｿｽblind�ｿｽ evaluation of
volumetric energy density, if we consider the whole
volume of the reactor core and the most conservative
figures on energy production, we still get a value of
(7.93 �ｿｽ 0.8) 102 MJ/Liter that is one order of magnitude
higher than any conventional source.
Lastly, it must be remarked that both tests were
terminated by a deliberate shutdown of the reactor, not
by fuel exhaustion; thus, the energy densities that were
measured should be considered as lower limits of real
values.
The March test is to be considered an improvement over
the one performed in December, in that various problems
encountered in the first experiment were addressed and
solved in the second one. In the next test experiment
which is expected to start in the summer of 2013, and
will last about six months, a long term performance of
the E-Cat HT2 will be tested. This test will be crucial
for further attempts to unveil the origin of the heat
phenomenon observed so far.
More at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
o o o
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used
for the educational purposes of research and open
discussion. The contents of this post may not have been
authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion
of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright
law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely
not be read, considered or answered if it does not
contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal
addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views
expressed by others are not necessarily those of the
poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted
material the use of which may or may not have been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This
material is being made available in efforts to advance
the understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and
cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research, comment,
discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to
USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one
or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several
times.
reactor device
Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbj�ｿｽrn Hartman, Bo
H�ｿｽistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegn�ｿｽr, Hanno Ess�ｿｽn
(Submitted on 16 May 2013)
An experimental investigation of possible anomalous heat
production in a special type of reactor tube named E-Cat
HT is carried out. The reactor tube is charged with a
small amount of hydrogen loaded nickel powder plus some
additives. The reaction is primarily initiated by heat
from resistor coils inside the reactor tube. Measurement
of the produced heat was performed with high-resolution
thermal imaging cameras, recording data every second from
the hot reactor tube. The measurements of electrical
power input were performed with a large bandwidth three-
phase power analyzer. Data were collected in two
experimental runs lasting 96 and 116 hours, respectively.
An anomalous heat production was indicated in both
experiments. The 116-hour experiment also included a
calibration of the experimental set-up without the active
charge present in the E-Cat HT. In this case, no extra
heat was generated beyond the expected heat from the
electric input. Computed volumetric and gravimetric
energy densities were found to be far above those of any
known chemical source. Even by the most conservative
assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the
result is still one order of magnitude greater than
conventional energy sources.
Comments - 29 pages, 15 figues, plus plots and diagrams
Subjects - General Physics (physics.gen-ph)
Cite�ｿｽas - arXiv:1305.3913 [physics.gen-ph] (or
arXiv:1305.3913v1 [physics.gen-ph] for this version)
Conclusions
The two test measurements described in this text were
conducted with the same methodology on two different
devices: a first prototype, termed E-Cat HT, and a second
one, resulting from technological improvements on the
first, termed E-Cat HT2. Both have indicated heat
production from an unknown reaction primed by heat from
resistor coils. The results obtained indicate that energy
was produced in decidedly higher quantities than what may
be gained from any conventional source. In the March
test, about 62 net kWh were produced, with a consumption
of about 33 kWh, a power density of about 5.3 �ｿｽ 10^5, and
a density of thermal energy of about 6.1 �ｿｽ 10^7Wh/kg. In
the December test, about 160 net kWh were produced, with
a consumption of 35 kWh, a power density of about 7 �ｿｽ
10^3W/kg and a thermal energy density of about 6.8 �ｿｽ
10^5Wh/kg. The difference in results between the two
tests may be seen in the overestimation of the weight of
the charge in the first test (which was comprehensive of
the weight of the two metal caps sealing the cylinder),
and in the manufacturer�ｿｽs choice of keeping temperatures
under control in the second experiment to enhance the
stability of the operating cycle. In any event, the
results obtained place both devices several orders of
magnitude outside the
Even from the standpoint of a �ｿｽblind�ｿｽ evaluation of
volumetric energy density, if we consider the whole
volume of the reactor core and the most conservative
figures on energy production, we still get a value of
(7.93 �ｿｽ 0.8) 102 MJ/Liter that is one order of magnitude
higher than any conventional source.
Lastly, it must be remarked that both tests were
terminated by a deliberate shutdown of the reactor, not
by fuel exhaustion; thus, the energy densities that were
measured should be considered as lower limits of real
values.
The March test is to be considered an improvement over
the one performed in December, in that various problems
encountered in the first experiment were addressed and
solved in the second one. In the next test experiment
which is expected to start in the summer of 2013, and
will last about six months, a long term performance of
the E-Cat HT2 will be tested. This test will be crucial
for further attempts to unveil the origin of the heat
phenomenon observed so far.
More at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
o o o
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used
for the educational purposes of research and open
discussion. The contents of this post may not have been
authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion
of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright
law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely
not be read, considered or answered if it does not
contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal
addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views
expressed by others are not necessarily those of the
poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted
material the use of which may or may not have been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This
material is being made available in efforts to advance
the understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and
cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research, comment,
discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to
USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one
or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several
times.
hab...@anony.net
May 20, 2013, 5:16:07 PM5/20/13
to
Its all fake. Energy is stored using grid electricity and then
produced as 'surplus'. He has been at it for ten years and has never
produced more power output than what he puts in.
produced as 'surplus'. He has been at it for ten years and has never
produced more power output than what he puts in.
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
May 20, 2013, 5:24:02 PM5/20/13
to
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
> H�istad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegn�r, Hanno Ess�n
> Cite�as - arXiv:1305.3913 [physics.gen-ph] (or
> a density of thermal energy of about 6.1 � 10^7Wh/kg. In
http://lenr-canr.org/
- Kevmo
End of forwarded post.
>
> Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
> reactor device
>
> Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbj�rn Hartman, Bo
> Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
> reactor device
>
> H�istad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegn�r, Hanno Ess�n
> arXiv:1305.3913v1 [physics.gen-ph] for this version)
>
> Conclusions
>
> The two test measurements described in this text were
> conducted with the same methodology on two different
> devices: a first prototype, termed E-Cat HT, and a second
> one, resulting from technological improvements on the
> first, termed E-Cat HT2. Both have indicated heat
> production from an unknown reaction primed by heat from
> resistor coils. The results obtained indicate that energy
> was produced in decidedly higher quantities than what may
> be gained from any conventional source. In the March
> test, about 62 net kWh were produced, with a consumption
> of about 33 kWh, a power density of about 5.3 � 10^5, and
>
> Conclusions
>
> The two test measurements described in this text were
> conducted with the same methodology on two different
> devices: a first prototype, termed E-Cat HT, and a second
> one, resulting from technological improvements on the
> first, termed E-Cat HT2. Both have indicated heat
> production from an unknown reaction primed by heat from
> resistor coils. The results obtained indicate that energy
> was produced in decidedly higher quantities than what may
> be gained from any conventional source. In the March
> test, about 62 net kWh were produced, with a consumption
> a density of thermal energy of about 6.1 � 10^7Wh/kg. In
> the December test, about 160 net kWh were produced, with
> a consumption of 35 kWh, a power density of about 7 �
> a consumption of 35 kWh, a power density of about 7 �
> 10^3W/kg and a thermal energy density of about 6.8 �
> 10^5Wh/kg. The difference in results between the two
> tests may be seen in the overestimation of the weight of
> the charge in the first test (which was comprehensive of
> the weight of the two metal caps sealing the cylinder),
> and in the manufacturer�s choice of keeping temperatures
> tests may be seen in the overestimation of the weight of
> the charge in the first test (which was comprehensive of
> the weight of the two metal caps sealing the cylinder),
> under control in the second experiment to enhance the
> stability of the operating cycle. In any event, the
> results obtained place both devices several orders of
> magnitude outside the
>
> Even from the standpoint of a �blind� evaluation of
> stability of the operating cycle. In any event, the
> results obtained place both devices several orders of
> magnitude outside the
>
> volumetric energy density, if we consider the whole
> volume of the reactor core and the most conservative
> figures on energy production, we still get a value of
> (7.93 � 0.8) 102 MJ/Liter that is one order of magnitude
> volume of the reactor core and the most conservative
> figures on energy production, we still get a value of
> higher than any conventional source.
>
> Lastly, it must be remarked that both tests were
> terminated by a deliberate shutdown of the reactor, not
> by fuel exhaustion; thus, the energy densities that were
> measured should be considered as lower limits of real
> values.
>
> The March test is to be considered an improvement over
> the one performed in December, in that various problems
> encountered in the first experiment were addressed and
> solved in the second one. In the next test experiment
> which is expected to start in the summer of 2013, and
> will last about six months, a long term performance of
> the E-Cat HT2 will be tested. This test will be crucial
> for further attempts to unveil the origin of the heat
> phenomenon observed so far.
>
> More at:
>
http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
Forwarded post:
>
> Lastly, it must be remarked that both tests were
> terminated by a deliberate shutdown of the reactor, not
> by fuel exhaustion; thus, the energy densities that were
> measured should be considered as lower limits of real
> values.
>
> The March test is to be considered an improvement over
> the one performed in December, in that various problems
> encountered in the first experiment were addressed and
> solved in the second one. In the next test experiment
> which is expected to start in the summer of 2013, and
> will last about six months, a long term performance of
> the E-Cat HT2 will be tested. This test will be crucial
> for further attempts to unveil the origin of the heat
> phenomenon observed so far.
>
> More at:
>
http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
http://lenr-canr.org/
- Kevmo
End of forwarded post.
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
May 20, 2013, 5:29:07 PM5/20/13
to
Mr. B1ack
May 20, 2013, 6:19:28 PM5/20/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:29:10 GMT, use...@mantra.com and/or
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
>reactor device
Better hope it wasn't "cold fusion" - or you'll be
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
>reactor device
dead from radiation exposure pretty soon now.
0 new messages