In order to post you must be cheerful and not in a state of denial.
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
*DAM and double DAM*
I thrive on mediocrity, but fear I will have to lower my standards.
Pass me that Lobster Thermidor..hick...this champagne is making me
dizzy. So..How's the new Jaguar, Bret? Any ideas for running my Rolls on
Hydrogen? No? Ah well. We tried..hick....gimme another shot...yeah..we
need hick..another group..yeah...
mike
--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.
Is this Abandonment, Nihilism or Hedonism?
Abandonment, in law, is the relinquishment or renunciation of an
interest, claim, privilege, possession or right, especially with the
intent of never again resuming or reasserting it. Such intentional
action may take the form of a discontinuance or a waiver.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonment
Nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing
can be known or communicated. It is often associated with extreme
pessimism and a radical skepticism that condemns existence. A true
nihilist would believe in nothing, have no loyalties, and no purpose
other than, perhaps, an impulse to destroy. While few philosophers
would claim to be nihilists, nihilism is most often associated with
Friedrich Nietzsche who argued that its corrosive effects would
eventually destroy all moral, religious, and metaphysical convictions
and precipitate the greatest crisis in human history. In the 20th
century, nihilistic themes--epistemological failure, value
destruction, and cosmic purposelessness--have preoccupied artists,
social critics, and philosophers. Mid-century, for example, the
existentialists helped popularize tenets of nihilism in their attempts
to blunt its destructive potential. By the end of the century,
existential despair as a response to nihilism gave way to an attitude
of indifference, often associated with antifoundationalism.
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/n/nihilism.htm
Hedonism is the name given to the group of ethical systems that hold,
with various modifications, that feelings of pleasure or happiness are
the highest and final aim of conduct; that, consequently those actions
which increase the sum of pleasure are thereby constituted right, and,
conversely, what increases pain is wrong.
The father of Hedonism was Aristippus of Cyrene. He taught that
pleasure is the universal and ultimate object of endeavour. By
pleasure he meant not merely sensual gratification but also the higher
forms of enjoyment, mental pleasures, domestic love, friendship, and
moral contentment. His followers, however, reduced the system to a
plea for self-indulgence ... the School of Epicurus, who emphasized
the superiority of social and intellectual pleasures over those of the
senses.
Bleah. We need a news group that focuses on enjoying the
end-of-the-world apocalypticism of fundamentalist Gaiaist
Greenshirts. The end is nigh, repent of thy consumptions.
> In order to post you must be cheerful and not in a state of denial.
It's the end of the world as we know it.
It's the end of the world as we know it,
and I feel fine.
Or do we just have another sophism here? Belief is so human and
convincing the reader of some 'truth' is so mundane.
But, post away........
Mankind's last days on Earth are caused by his own stupidity and lack of
foresight.
So enjoy your stupidity!
And let us hope the blight called man is wiped off the face of Earth as soon
as possible.
THE BORG wrote:
> Mankind's last days on Earth are caused by his own stupidity and lack of
> foresight.
> So enjoy your stupidity!
> And let us hope the blight called man is wiped off the face of Earth as
> soon as possible.
THIS IS THE FIRST DAY OF THE RST OF YOUR LIFE!
Ang
>> Pass me that Lobster Thermidor..hick...this champagne is making me
>> dizzy. So..How's the new Jaguar, Bret? Any ideas for running my Rolls on
>> Hydrogen? No? Ah well. We tried..hick....gimme another shot...yeah..we
>> need hick..another group..yeah...
> Is this Abandonment, Nihilism or Hedonism?
Yeah..that's what it is...what you said...
burp.....
I wanna hear the big "negatory."
Bret Cahill
No, nutters believe there will be an impeachment, war crimes
trials, and other assorted melting-clockisms.
> I wanna hear the big "negatory."
So you admit that you are nostalgic for the high-tax
high-interest-rate, high-unemployment, high-inflation
super Jimmy Carter/Jim Jones seventies?
Next, you'll be singing the Village People.
> No, nutters believe there will be an impeachment, war crimes
> trials, and other assorted melting-clockisms.
I didn't hear the big "negatory."
Bret Cahill
So "no" isn't good enough anymore, now that we're
heading forward into the past? Late seventies high-tax
Jimmy Carter economic stagflation boom, here we
come!
A big negatory to KKKahill's suggestion that somebody
assassinate some Democrat or another, as though
that would prevent the one term Carteresque Presidency
from crashing and burning. I'm not surprised that the
Stalinist Leftard wing wants to stage a purge though.
> > > No, nutters believe there will be an impeachment, war crimes
> > > trials, and other assorted melting-clockisms.
> > I didn't hear the big "negatory."
> So "no" isn't good enough anymore,
Not from nutters.
We know two things:
1. Rightards have no political options other than assassinations,
and,
2. The Supreme Court ruled that shooting DC blacks was
constitutional.
In 7 months Obama will become a DC black.
Now say "negatory" like you _mean_ it.
Bret Cahill
Well, let's grant the Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum
physics for a paragraph. Let's say that in one of the many
worlds, there's a history that matches your own loonie version.
Then, we'd have to assume that Obama won't pick Hitlery as
his running mate. Nothing like leaving temptation in her hands.
Anyway, since there hasn't been a single Squeaky Fromme
leftard (out of the millions) who has managed to get a shot in on
W, I'm guessing that our security services earn their keep these
days.
Bret Cahill
If you keep hearing voices saying "out of my live warm hands,"
you're bound to wind up sniping from a tower.
I have solar panels out in the shed in case the grid goes down, which
it may not because my power comes from the Petit Jean Hydro. I didnt
raise sorghum this year, but I know how, and how to ferment the juice,
and still have the still. IT wont be moonshine, but rum. Which cannot
have any of the isopropyl the former has that causes brain damage.
There are lotsa rebel flag well armed rednecks out here, but they'd
keep out the flatland rabble. And none of them would want to burn down
a distillery.
I have enuf seed for several acres of Sorghum, and the U of GA website
that says I can get 100-120 gallons of ethanol per acre with just 3.5
gallons of engine fuel. Sorghum is gonzo easier to deal with than corn.
Crunch the numbers. The average farm country county is 25 X 25 miles,
or 400,000 acres. Which could produce 40,000,000 gallons of ethanol
from sorghum. Which could be converted into butanol which has the very
same BTU rating as gasoline and can be put in the "gas" tank with no
significant diff in performance.
So, less see: 150 counties would produce 20 gallons of fuel for every
car in the country. Each state could have its own supply. 200 gallons
for every car every year would keep the economy going as is. That'd
require a piece of land 950 X 950 miles- however. With sorghum, you
still have the mash which you can feed livestock with to raise beef.
and you still have the seed to raise poultry with for chicken in
every pot. And you still have the manure from these animals to put
back on the land.
Unlike the oil crops for biodiesel, the ethanol is made up entirely
of hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon, all of which come out of the rain
and air. Not out of the dirt. You can grow sorghum forever replacing
only the nutrients lost from the farm in the meat, milk, and eggs.
Why you spoze they aint already doing this?
---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups