Professional Debunkers
Michael Hannon
G.D.Mutch wrote:
>
> Hi to all on sci.energy hydrogen.
>
> Yes ... its a sad fact there are people out there on the net who get paid
> to do professional debunking on certain news groups and lists.
>
> They do this in a number of ways.
> 1. They do out right criticism of your work or understanding.
> 2. They use sarcasms or out right rude public comments.
> 3. They use confidence tricks (con-man) and slowly lead you in the wrong
> direction.
> 4. Email your pere group behind your back and influence them.
> 5. They even argue between themselves to get people to follow one of them or
> take sides, thus further leading those astray.
>
> But the Primary objective is to 'GET YOU OFF THE LIST or DISCREDIT YOU'.
>
> So let it be known ladies and gents the professional debunkers are
> there and they are real... I've had my share of them.
>
> But you have to take the good with the bad, I don't mind. They sometimes
> help you out and they don't even realize it themselves.
>
> Now I'm not saying there are any such people on this list, but you can never
> be to careful. I don't care how many Doctrines/PHD's or letters and
> certifications you have behind your name. There is a billion and one back yard
> and small lab. personnel who have just as much right to knowledge as the person
> with the PHD on a piece of paper. And have just as much right to express their
> truth from their own experimentation. Conflicting terminology is a big thing
> across language barriers; people some times spend a lot of time arguing
> about the same knowledge base, only to find they were just using different
> names to describe the same event.
>
> Be a man/women don't wimp out because it gets tough: stand on your own two feet.
>
> -G.D.Mutch
Applause for this person, and KUDO's as well - I remember this post from
earlier times, and want to thank you for the support, G.D.
All the Best,
Michael
G.D.Mutch
h2o...@aol.com
This should be posted on every topic string..weekly.
JW
Jim Toth
Michael Hannon <oha...@mailroom.worldnet.att.net> wrote in article
<33420A...@mailroom.worldnet.att.net>...
> Applause for this person, and KUDO's as well - I remember this post from
> earlier times, and want to thank you for the support, G.D.
>
> All the Best,
> Michael
>
>
>
Are you serious? People get paid for this? I've been getting screwed then,
or somebody owes me a lot of money. Where do I collect? ; )
Somebody better pay up, or I'm gonna Quit!
Jim
Robert Erck
In article <01bc3fe3$84501c60$69a9...@jptoth.psci.net>, "Jim Toth"
<jpt...@psci.net> wrote:
Yeah! I'm not getting paid to look up the vapor pressure of water, or do
Hannon's quizzes either! I think we should go on strike until Michael
starts paying us!
Bob Falkiner
I personally have never experienced any evidence of this in this and
related newsgroups. If a person with professional credentials undertook
this activity, without declaration of the source of funding, then I
believe that they would be in violation of their professional
accreditation. THerefore, if you believe that this has happened,
register a complaint against with the accreditation administration.
In many cases, this amounts to a charge of professional misconduct and
the like, so be sure of your facts prior to going this route.
Harry H Conover
G.D.Mutch (mut...@topaz.cqu.edu.au) wrote:
: Hi to all on sci.energy hydrogen.
:
: Yes ... its a sad fact there are people out there on the net who get paid
: to do professional debunking on certain news groups and lists.
...And your evidence of this is???????
If the 'inventions' and concepts cannot withstand the pressure of
critical examination and questioning, you really shouldn't post them
in a sci hierarchy newsgroup.
Harry C.