On Fri, 6 Feb 2015,
spamtr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 3:59:18 AM UTC-8, N_Cook wrote:
>> On 06/02/2015 09:37,
spamtr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> This Zenith DVD2381 has worked for years, except for a spell a few
>>> years ago when the tray would shudder but not quite open and close.
>>> I managed to free it up.
>>>
> ...
>> try googling model number and "badcaps"
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> Nothing leapt out at me. The electrolytics in and around the power supply
> also look pristine. They are marked "KME" and "SMS", so likely Chemi-Con.
>
But looks can be deceiving.
That Acer LCD monitor I brought home sort of worked, except it kept
resetting to the point where it was showing the logo on the screen. So
the power supply was nominally good. I changed the larger value
electrolytics in the power supply, none of them looked bad. And it's
worked fine since.
> Do Chemi-Con electrolytics have a bad reputation? They are not called
> out as bad on the badcaps site.
>
>
A little bit of information is worse than a lot.
There were instances of "bad caps" but electrolytics by nature can dry
out. It's about how they are used, and the heat they see.
In the tube days, most equipment had only a handful of electrolytics, in
the power supply and to bypass the cathode resistor(s) in the audio
amplifier chain. You could usually easily tell there was a bad
electrolytic, you'd hear hum in the speaker (because the power supply
filter capacitor went bad), or maybe lesser audio output.
Transistorized gear brought a lot more electrolytics, since tubes were
high voltage low current, and transistors were love voltage high current.
They needed electrolytics because the lower impedances meant a need for
larger valuce capacitors, and the only way to get that in a small package
was electrolytic capacitors.
And take transisfor radios from 40 or 50 years ago, and the electrolytics
generally need replacing because they are now old.
But the real change was when switching supplies came along. Power supply
capacitors before that only had to keep out 60 or 120Hz, pretty low
frequencies. Switching supplies got by with lower value electrolytics,
since they operated at a higher frequency, tens of KHz, but that meant the
electrolytics had to work harder. And that's why they are now suspect
when something with a switching supply goes bad. They are more likely to
go bad than a diode or other component.
Michael