OK, no big deal, but slightly annoying, so I fired off an email to the
station, alerting them to this situation and asking them if this was due
to an omission at their end. (I confess I really don't know what that
information is called, or how it gets supplied at their end. All I know
is that it is somehow transmitted as part of the DTV datastream.)
Well, a day or two later, the program information started appearing for
that station. I figured it *might* have been on account of my email--big
slaps on the back for me as an Alert Citizen!--but since they hadn't
replied, I had no way of knowing.
Then a couple days after that I got a reply back. The station's
operations manager wrote and told me that they (the station) was
supplying that information, and therefore if I wasn't seeing it, it was
probably due to a problem at my end. He suggested doing a complete
rescan (not an "update scan") on my DTV box.
I wrote back, and he replied to that. Here's what he said, in part:
> Nothing changed on our end. However it is not unheard of for
> set-top-boxes to need to reload the PSIP tables for a channel once in a
> while. Forcing a rescan forces the tables to reload. Eventually they
> will usually reload on their own which is probably what happened in your
> case.
(I had done nothing to my DTV box this whole time.)
So does anyone know if this is correct? Now there's another station (one
of the big networks, not a local independent) that's missing its program
info. Is it possible that my DTV box would selectively omit this
information for just one or a few stations? Every other station shows
this info for me, with the exceptions noted above.
--
The current state of literacy in our advanced civilization:
yo
wassup
nuttin
wan2 hang
k
where
here
k
l8tr
by
- from Usenet (what's *that*?)
>> Nothing changed on our end. However it is not unheard of for
>> set-top-boxes to need to reload the PSIP tables for a channel once in a
>> while. Forcing a rescan forces the tables to reload. Eventually they
>> will usually reload on their own which is probably what happened in your
>> case.
> (I had done nothing to my DTV box this whole time.)
> So does anyone know if this is correct? Now there's another station (one
> of the big networks, not a local independent) that's missing its program
> info. Is it possible that my DTV box would selectively omit this
> information for just one or a few stations? Every other station shows
> this info for me, with the exceptions noted above.
It might be true. I note that the information supplied, and even the call
letters (!!!) of particular channels, can change from day to day on my
Vizio, even though I have done nothing.
>Then a couple days after that I got a reply back. The station's
>operations manager wrote and told me that they (the station) was
>supplying that information, and therefore if I wasn't seeing it, it was
>probably due to a problem at my end. He suggested doing a complete
>rescan (not an "update scan") on my DTV box.
That's probably a good idea. However, you can identify the culprit by
simply checking for data presence on a different TV set (or at a local
store). If none of the TV's see data from this station, then it's
their problem. If only your TV lacks data, it's your problem.
--
Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
IME DVB-T STBs seem particularly prone to mains borne noise and spikes
corrupting the various bits of NVR data, you could try a mains conditioning
socket strip to clean up the supply or run it through a UPS - handy for
power outages that would mess up recordings on a PVR, otherwise doing the
occasional re-scan is not such a big deal.
Are you sure of this, or is this just hand-waving? (Like the old "reboot
your computer" advice of the techie on the other end of the phone, no
matter what the problem.)
I ask because after doing a rescan, *another* channel still shows no
program information, so obviously the scan did nothing to correct that.
I still have no idea if the problem is at their end or my end, but the
scan didn't help.
Does someone here *actually know* how this information is handled,
propagated, etc?
Various DVB-T faults get discussed on uk.tech.digital-tv so you could try
asking there.
A search of the newsgroup list on the server I connect to only found uk, Aus
& ru digital TV newsgroups.
> "David Nebenzahl" <nob...@but.us.chickens> wrote in message
> news:4d9a3211$0$7784$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
>
>> Does someone here *actually know* how this information is handled,
>> propagated, etc?
>
> Various DVB-T faults get discussed on uk.tech.digital-tv so you could try
> asking there.
You use the term "DVB-T" as if that's supposed to mean something to me.
I'd never heard this term before.
OK, so it appears to be a *prospective* worldwide DTV standards-setting
body. (Looks suspiciously like yet another Euro-standard being pushed on
us, but never mind.)
But is this even applicable to the US? Not sure, even after reading
this, with no mention of DVB-T applying to us:
http://www.dvb.org/about_dvb/dvb_worldwide/usa
In any case, I'm still looking forward to someone *here* who has at
least an inkling of how textual program information is handled *here*
(the US, where I live).
You don't seem very grateful for the attempts to help you, so I think I've
reached the limit of what I can do for you.
> "David Nebenzahl" <nob...@but.us.chickens> wrote in message
> news:4d9a36ed$0$11893$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
>
>> On 4/4/2011 2:13 PM Ian Field spake thus:
>>
>>> "David Nebenzahl" <nob...@but.us.chickens> wrote in message
>>> news:4d9a3211$0$7784$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
>>>
>>>> Does someone here *actually know* how this information is
>>>> handled, propagated, etc?
>>>
>>> Various DVB-T faults get discussed on uk.tech.digital-tv so you
>>> could try asking there.
>>
>> You use the term "DVB-T" as if that's supposed to mean something to
>> me. I'd never heard this term before.
>>
>> OK, so it appears to be a *prospective* worldwide DTV
>> standards-setting body. (Looks suspiciously like yet another
>> Euro-standard being pushed on us, but never mind.)
>>
>> But is this even applicable to the US? Not sure, even after reading
>> this, with no mention of DVB-T applying to us:
>>
>> http://www.dvb.org/about_dvb/dvb_worldwide/usa
>>
>> In any case, I'm still looking forward to someone *here* who has at
>> least an inkling of how textual program information is handled
>> *here* (the US, where I live).
>
> You don't seem very grateful for the attempts to help you, so I think I've
> reached the limit of what I can do for you.
Well, you haven't been very helpful, so I guess we're even.
> Go read this as it should help you get started.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSIP
Thank you. You win the "first person to actually provide useful
information in this whole damn thread" award.