On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:17:07 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
<
mmarlo...@windstream.net> wrote:
>Danny D. wrote:
>> John Paquay wrote, on Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:51:58 -0400:
>>
>>> My knee jerk reaction to the original posting in this thread was not
>>> "What's wrong with these kids?", but rather, "What's wrong with this
>>> teacher?"
>>
>> She's brand new to teaching, but, it turns out that classroom
>> management is a standard problem in these multi-ethnic San Jose
>> schools.
>>
>
>Well - that's a big part of your problem. Rather than teaching kids things,
>parents and teachers rally around excuses for what the things exist. I wish
>you the best - deal with the problems you are creating.
>
>
>> One teacher uses a bathroom plunger, as his bathroom pass.
>
>Brilliant! Shear stupidity - so why shouldn't everyone else follow suit?
Mikw Marlow:
If you are so wise let's hear your solutions to each case where you
kvetched. There are several, let's hear what you would have the
teacher/school do.
?-/
>
>>
>>> To me, the whole idea of using some (any) ginormous item as a hall
>>> pass is stupid, demeaning, and completely counterproductive... not to
>>> mention, an exercise in futility. What does this really accomplish?
>>
>> What it (attempts to) accomplish is the reduce undue interruptions of
>> the classroom environment.
>>
>
>Brain dead thinking. But that's fine - do that kind of thinking where you
>live. What in the hell do you really think you are solving with this kind
>of approach?
>
>
>> We all know that the kids can go to the bathroom plenty of other
>> times, but, all kids will take advantage of a "free pass" out of
>> jail, if
>> even for only 10 minutes (which they can synchronize with other
>> friends, if they're clever).
>
>You just keep on letting those kids outsmart you. I'm sure you'll win that
>way...
>
>
>>
>> What the pass does, first and foremost, is it discourages such
>> intents.
>
>Bullshit! Are you and the teachers at that school that stupid as to really
>believe this? If so - muck in your own mire.
>
>> Also, it allows the teacher to continue teaching,
>> uninterrupted, as
>> the students just get up, grab the pass, and return, unannounced.
>
>Really? Do you even think about the things like this that you post?
>
>
>>
>> It also is very clear to everyone, what the purpose of the kid is,
>> whether grabbing the pass or walking the hallways. It's also not
>> something they can leave hidden in the hallway while they
>> surreptitiously run a'muck about the hallways or outdoors to catch a
>> smoke or whatever.
>
>Dear Parent...
>
>
>>
>> Likewise, it prevents multiple kids (from the same classroom anyway)
>> leaving the room at any one time.
>
>Really? The high paid teacher is this dumb as to not be aware of this
>syndrome? Really?
>
>
>>
>> Furthermore, it's obvious to all whether the bathroom pass is in use
>> or not. It's like the red sign on an airplane bathroom door showing
>> it's in use, rather than what we have to do at a McDonalds, which is
>> to jiggle the doorknob repeatedly to find out if someone is in there.
>
>Yeah - when I was a kid I had a really hard time understanding a locked
>door - are you really this stupid? How about facilities that accomodate 4
>kids at once - where does that fit into your foolish thinking?
>
>>
>> And, being so large (on purpose), the kids, who almost certainly don't
>> like it, can't lose it easily.
>
>Oh man - that just can't be anymore stupid.
>
>>
>> At the very least, it's objectionable to carry (as you noted), which
>> would further discourage the unnecessary potty breaks.
>
>Really? What in the hell is the problem you are looking to solve? I think
>you have a California mindset which just does not think at all.
>
>
>>
>> Rest assured, this teacher has at least one kid a day out of her 200,
>> walk out on the class without excuse.
>
>Really? Then fire the teacher. That is her or his responsibility to make
>sure that kind of thing does not happen. Screw the 200 number - that's a
>classic over-exageration - how many students in any one class session? The
>total number is completely meaningless.
>
>
>> She has kids banging on the
>> table, and calling her a b*ch, and plenty of disciplinary problems,
>> all of which are common through all the classes, as she told me most
>> of these kids are being weeded out of the system through their
>> behavior in *all* their classes.
>
>Guess you guys need to improve your school disciplines and forget looking at
>magic tokens like stupid wood fobs for a key to the boys room. Do you
>really belive that is going to fix the problems you guys have created in
>your schools? Really? Are you really that dumb?
>
>>
>> I also find this behavior strange, as *my* kids have always had
>> comments on their report cards of "very polite", "always helpful",
>> "pitches in to volunteer every time I ask", and even once "raises
>> hand to answer questions too often!".
>
>Good for you! That's what is necessary - not stupid fobs.
>
>
>>
>> I think this teacher, who is brand new, is learning on the job. In
>> California, they go through 3 semesters of graduate training, to
>> obtain a preliminary teaching certificate, two semesters of which
>> have on-the-job training of sorts.
>>
>
>Kudos to you for trying to help a new teacher but don't you see that the
>problem is so much bigger than that?
>
>> Then, they're thrown to the wolves for 2 more years, until they get
>> their preliminary teaching certificate cleared. At that point, they
>> also get tenure (which is kind'a soon, if you ask me), and then
>> they're bona-fide teachers.
>
>Well - you might want to take the problem up with your school district. You
>guys created the problem and stupid ideas like wooden fobs is not going to
>fix that problem.
>
>
>>
>> The clearance process, apparently, starts with three weeks of
>> training on "classroom management", which I found odd when I saw that
>> it's the *first* thing they re-train the preliminary-credentialed
>> teachers on.
>
>Oh well...
>
>>
>> You have to remember these are Algebra classes, where probably only a
>> small percentage of the kids (maybe 1/3?) actually care to learn it.
>> It's a required class for the rest, which they hope to never see
>> again during the rest of their lives.
>
>We have to remember? Really? Are you that stupid? They are in school.
>They are there to learn what they are told to be taught. We have to
>remember? I see the very root of this problem...
>
>>
>> When is the last time you or I graphed a quadratic equation, for
>> example? Could each of us solve a binomial equation to save our lives?
>> (Building suspension bridges in the redwoods notwithstanding... :)
>
>Competely irrelevent! We did do it when we were in school. What does it
>matter at all when the last time was that we did it. I'll tell you that I
>have used that knowledge throughout my life - though it may not have been on
>a daily basis - but when I needed it, I could call on it. You are making
>excuses for dumbing down our already stupid kids even more?