On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 19:56:19 -0500, Michael Black <
et...@ncf.ca> wrote:
>On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Jeroni Paul wrote:
>
>> Dave Platt wrote:
>>> More frequently, somebody using a Web interface to a USENET archive
>>> with a very long memory (i.e. Google Groups) will do a search for a
>>> keyword of interest to them, see an article which seems relevant, and
>>> post a followup... not noticing that the article to which they are
>>> replying is five or ten years old.
>>
>> As far as I know Google groups does not allow replies to messages older
>> than 60 days.
>>
>Originally it was thirty days, which is reasonable.
>
>Then they changed the interface, to make it more useful for their
>"groups", and they put in a bug that allowed replies to old messages.
>
>I know I complained, I hope others did, and soon it was fixed, back to
Why does it bother you if people reply to old messages?.
Many newsgroups have regulars who post and stay around reading 5, 10, 20
years later. And many other people come in late, like this week, find
an old post and have a question or comment about it. Why shouldn't
they post?
And even if the OP never sees that reply, other people will.
There are problems with people who don't know how to quote, who jump in
the middle without saying what they're replying to, or who are just
stupid or piggish, but those kinds of replies occur in the week after an
OP also. They're not a problem BECAUSE they are 31 or 61 or 731 days
later.
I suppose there are reasons google might not want late replies, but why
would a consumer object?