HW <
no...@no.no> wrote:
>
> From what I understand, most people who have tried both, prefer a
> standalone scope over a PC based one.
>
Understood completely, if this were for routine use I'd agree. But,
mine is a once-in-a-blue-moon use case.
>
> You can get a very nice, brand new, hobby scope for that kind of
> money. The Rigol DS1054Z seems to be available for around $450. That
> is a four-channel, 50 MHz scope. It can easily be hacked for 100 MHz
> bandwidth.
That's better than I need by a wide margin, but it's tempting 8-)
Thanks for writing,
bob prohaska