Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Right length for table radio antenna

76 views
Skip to first unread message

Micky

unread,
Nov 16, 2015, 5:18:21 PM11/16/15
to
I have a table radio that used to have one stranded wire coming out
the back, about a foot long, which I think was the AM or FM antenna.

I want to replace it. Is there an optimum length for such a wire? Is
that measured from the variable capacitor? (I haven't opened this
radio yet, but that's where I usually see antenna wires connected.)

Thanks.

jurb...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 16, 2015, 5:41:34 PM11/16/15
to
The AM is usually a loopstick inside the radio. That is for FM. The length really doesn't matter much.

On AM, the loopstick antenna is part of the tuned circuit and is sensitive. On the other hand, FM pretty much tolerates anything. Unless you want to find the correct ground and impedance and make a proper antenna like those T type ones, just don't worry about it. One wire going to the screw that is the farthest away from ground, any length you like.

Allodoxaphobia

unread,
Nov 16, 2015, 6:43:34 PM11/16/15
to
If a wire has one end, then it has another.
That ought to be adequate...

Jonesy
--
Marvin L Jones | W3DHJ | W3DHJ | http://W3DHJ.net/
Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | __
38.238N 104.547W | jonz.net | DM78rf | 73 SK

pf...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2015, 6:31:07 AM11/17/15
to
There is a lot of literature on the "correct" antenna length for a table radio - but what you need to keep in mind is that where inches/cm matter is for FM. For AM and SW, the typical response would be "the longer the better" - and within broad limits, that is the case.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/antennagenericfreqlencalc.html

Will help you with the specifics.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

Fred McKenzie

unread,
Nov 17, 2015, 12:59:48 PM11/17/15
to
In article <0clk4bptiatrincd9...@4ax.com>,
Micky-

As others have stated, it is not critical. For nearby stations, it may
work without the wire!

The wire you want to replace would ideally be one quarter wavelength
long. But that length would be "ideal" at only one frequency. So
whatever you choose is a compromise.

Suppose the FM band covers the range of 88 to 108 MHz. The middle of
the band would be 98 MHz. A wavelength would be 300/98 = 3.06 Meters.
A quarter wavelength would be 76.5 CM or 30.1 inches.

Fred

thekma...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2015, 3:37:34 PM11/17/15
to
Fred:

When would it be appropiate to use
a half-wavelength or quarter as the
dimension of the antenna being built?

Fred McKenzie

unread,
Nov 18, 2015, 2:29:00 PM11/18/15
to
In article <239f41c2-5923-4e39...@googlegroups.com>,
KMan-

Perhaps I was mistaken in saying a quarter wave wire was "ideal". My
main point was that the length was a compromise to begin with, so is not
critical.

Relative to the body of the receiver, a half wave wire fed from one end
has a high impedance. A quarter wave wire has a relatively low
impedance. How the wire connects to the receiver would determine which
would be best.

Suppose the radio has a coil and capacitor parallel-tuned circuit with
one side connected to the body of the receiver. If the wire connects to
the other "high impedance" side of the tuned circuit, a half wave might
be better. If the wire connects to a tap on the coil, or to a smaller
coil wound over the first, a quarter wave might be better.

I suspect the typical table radio with a wire coming out the back, has
the wire connected to a relatively high impedance point. In other
words, the designer may not have put that much thought into it.

I have an old Heathkit receiver that has a balanced 300 Ohm input for
its FM tuner. A 75 Ohm unbalanced antenna could be connected between
one of the 300 Ohm terminals and ground. I use a single wire connected
to one terminal, and can pick up many stations.

Fred

isw

unread,
Nov 18, 2015, 11:48:24 PM11/18/15
to
In article <fmmck-57B336....@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
Fred McKenzie <fm...@aol.com> wrote:

> In article <239f41c2-5923-4e39...@googlegroups.com>,
> thekma...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Fred:
> >
> > When would it be appropiate to use
> > a half-wavelength or quarter as the
> > dimension of the antenna being built?
>
> KMan-
>
> Perhaps I was mistaken in saying a quarter wave wire was "ideal". My
> main point was that the length was a compromise to begin with, so is not
> critical.

Interestingly, if the input is a *very high* impedance (a FET gate,
say), then the antenna length almost does not matter -- if the impedance
were truly infinite, then a point antenna would be fine. The E-field
will induce the same voltage in the antenna no matter how long or short
it is.

Impedance matching is only important when the input needs power, not
just voltage.

Isaac

Micky

unread,
Nov 19, 2015, 4:25:44 AM11/19/15
to
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:59:43 -0500, Fred McKenzie <fm...@aol.com>
wrote:

>In article <0clk4bptiatrincd9...@4ax.com>,
> Micky <NONONO...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a table radio that used to have one stranded wire coming out
>> the back, about a foot long, which I think was the AM or FM antenna.
>>
>> I want to replace it. Is there an optimum length for such a wire? Is
>> that measured from the variable capacitor? (I haven't opened this
>> radio yet, but that's where I usually see antenna wires connected.)
>
>Micky-
>
>As others have stated, it is not critical. For nearby stations, it may
>work without the wire!

Yes, there's a local station, WYPR 88.1 Baltimore, that just about
every radio gets.

>
>The wire you want to replace would ideally be one quarter wavelength
>long. But that length would be "ideal" at only one frequency. So
>whatever you choose is a compromise.
>
>Suppose the FM band covers the range of 88 to 108 MHz. The middle of
>the band would be 98 MHz. A wavelength would be 300/98 = 3.06 Meters.
>A quarter wavelength would be 76.5 CM or 30.1 inches.

30 inches is a lot longer than the wire was. I'm glad I asked. Even
15 inches, if 1/8 wavelengths are useful, is longer than the wire, i'm
pretty sure. (Someday I may find the wire on the floor in the corner
and I'll measure it. )

Besides 88.1t there are two other stations, I only get easily on the
car radio (no matter what car I have) and on a 250 dollar table radio
(KLH maybe), but not on some fancy digital tuner/preamp. Some other
table radios get one or both, at least if tuned perfectly, and it
doesn't seem to matter how expensive they are, so I've taken to buying
used radios for $3 to see if they will get those stations.

(But this radio I bought new for my mother because it had digital
tuning and I thought it would make it easier to change stations. )

Anyhow, the stations I want are in DC, maybe 35 miles away, on 88.5
(WAMU) and 90.1 (C-Span) so I think I'll use 88.5 in your formula
above and see how that goes. Maybe I'll trim a little off until I
reach the 90.1 length.

Several projects ahead of this, no space on the work bench, so I won't
be able to post back for a couple months or more.

Thanks and thanks everyone.


>Fred

Micky

unread,
Nov 28, 2015, 12:48:12 AM11/28/15
to
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:25:32 -0500, Micky <NONONO...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:59:43 -0500, Fred McKenzie <fm...@aol.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <0clk4bptiatrincd9...@4ax.com>,
>> Micky <NONONO...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have a table radio that used to have one stranded wire coming out
>>> the back, about a foot long, which I think was the AM or FM antenna.
>>>
>>> I want to replace it. Is there an optimum length for such a wire? Is
>>> that measured from the variable capacitor? (I haven't opened this
>>> radio yet, but that's where I usually see antenna wires connected.)
>>
>>Micky-
>>
>>As others have stated, it is not critical. For nearby stations, it may
>>work without the wire!
>
>Yes, there's a local station, WYPR 88.1 Baltimore, that just about
>every radio gets.
>
>>
>>The wire you want to replace would ideally be one quarter wavelength
>>long. But that length would be "ideal" at only one frequency. So
>>whatever you choose is a compromise.
>>
>>Suppose the FM band covers the range of 88 to 108 MHz. The middle of
>>the band would be 98 MHz. A wavelength would be 300/98 = 3.06 Meters.
>>A quarter wavelength would be 76.5 CM or 30.1 inches.

>30 inches is a lot longer than the wire was. I'm glad I asked. Even
>15 inches, if 1/8 wavelengths are useful, is longer than the wire, i'm
>pretty sure. (Someday I may find the wire on the floor in the corner
>and I'll measure it. )

BTW, a friend just gave me another radio, second hand, that indeed
does have a wire about 34 inches coming out the back, so some makers
care about this. I think that's what it shows, even if it's not 30.

He bought it at a Goodwill store to dock his iphone or ipad but he
says it doesnt' work. I don't have one to test with, but it also
doesn't get many radio stations. It's also missing its AM antenna and
the only source I have for a plug is maybe my auto burglar alarm from
the previous car, which I'm saving for the next car. For the record
it's an Imode model IP200A but I don't really plan to fix it

I posted mostly to say that its antenna was 34 inches, not just 15.

Chuck

unread,
Nov 28, 2015, 1:13:24 PM11/28/15
to
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:47:50 -0500, Micky <NONONO...@bigfoot.com>
One reason those radios have short antennas is the front ends overload
near powerful transmitters.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

0 new messages