Received: by 10.180.104.38 with SMTP id gb6mr2030739wib.4.1352676586549;
        Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:29:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: ha8ni222707wib.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Les Cargill <lcargil...@comcast.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.cad,sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Headline: Petraeus Resigns
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:29:43 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <k7pcda$jvj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <fjoq9854lgf7l7o7rll7ue5nvafuac98nv@4ax.com> <k7krpp$l09$2@dont-email.me> <loidneiU7MeMaADNnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <k7kt33$qr3$1@dont-email.me> <kt10a85j55ksrhmprjiljoo26d2h8u2a2i@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:29:46 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d1591dda43300d93872f86a6dcf85b87";
	logging-data="20467"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19g/CPd8dPPSWwoUqJdQ6IlllpG/TpZ2aI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2
In-Reply-To: <kt10a85j55ksrhmprjiljoo26d2h8u2a2i@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z4d1tmmv6LBrsuytmZahi1dJSqg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

flipper wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:43:45 -0600, Les Cargill
> <lcargil...@comcast.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>>
>>> Les Cargill wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>> Headline: Petraeus Resigns
>>>>>
>>>>>                                            ...Jim Thompson
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Turns out G.I. Joe was not anatomically correct.
>>>
>>>
>>>      Why would even care to know?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know. I didn't start the thread. Read it again until it's
>> funny; there is something deeply humorous about Petraeus being forced
>> to resign on grounds of virility.
>
> It might be 'humorous' if that were the reason but the reasons were
> because of exceedingly bad judgment and compromised security, both of
> which extend far beyond just the one man.
>

I suppose there is actual training materials and reams of regulation
on exactly what can transpire before it's a security breach?

> To wit, how are you going to explain to the rank and file that taking
> up with whatever bimbo who bats an eye is a potential security
> compromise if you wink and nod at the man with more security
> information than anyone else exercising similar 'judgment'?
>

We are already neck deep in swampy non-concepts...

"Judgement".

>> The Sovs always made up an "illness" story. We use... something
>> else.
>
> That because the Soviets had to "make up" something since, in their
> system, the 'privileged' were allowed whatever they wanted.
>

No, because absolutely nothing was ever issued as information
that *wasn't* made up, really :)


--
Les Cargill