Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Women Under Islam
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Fields  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 2:59 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.electronics.design
From: John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:59:23 -0500
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 2:59 am
Subject: Re: Women Under Islam
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:29:07 -0700, John Larkin

<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:43:56 -0500, John Fields
><jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

>>On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:20:56 -0700, John Larkin
>><jlar...@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:39:43 -0400, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>><k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:40:38 -0600, hamilton <hamil...@nothere.com> wrote:

>>>>>On 10/3/2012 6:40 PM, John Larkin wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:27:28 -0400, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>>>>> <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:55:26 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>> <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:06:54 -0400, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>>>>>>> <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:53:28 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>>> <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:59:34 -0700, John Larkin
>>>>>>>>>> <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't insult the lady. I assumed that she, like most women, was
>>>>>>>>>>> indeed smarter and more selective than the guys who have anonymous sex
>>>>>>>>>>> in public parks, or, as JF delicately expresses it, "experience joy"
>>>>>>>>>>> there.

>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> I didn't mention sexual preference, you did, and as usual, seem to
>>>>>>>>>> think that every encounter not specifically identified as being
>>>>>>>>>> heterosexual _must_ be homosexual.

>>>>>>>>> Interesting that no one brought up homosexual sex but you thought you needed
>>>>>>>>> to.

>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You must have either missed Larkin's earlier homosexual slur or
>>>>>>>> ignored it for your own porpoises - something fishy there -
>>>>>>>> ---

>>>>>>> It's interesting that you see queers who aren't there.  Maybe your mirror is a
>>>>>>> bit sensitive.

>>>>>> In my career, I've only met one gay EE, and he wasn't very good. He
>>>>>> inherited some money and gave up engineering for some artistic thing.
>>>>>> I have never met a female circuit designer... lots of scientists,
>>>>>> programmers, like that. Circuit design seems to be mostly a straight
>>>>>> male thing.

>>>>I've known three female design engineers, two good (one became a very good
>>>>manager and one was my lab partner in college), one not so much (a
>>>>double-affirmative action hire).

>>>>>> My wife is a speech pathologist. That profession is, literally, 99%
>>>>>> female.

>>>>>I am sure its a touchy feally position.

>>>>>What guy wants that !

>>---
>>Many do, and Larkin dotes on his wife, so maybe he's in that set.
>>---

>>>>Can't even blow things up! ;-)

>>>Yeah, and you have to be nice, too.

>>---
>>That's called being "pussywhipped", and relates to not demurring to
>>demands placed on you by your wife in return for sex.

>You have obviously had some very bad experiences with women, to
>dislike them so much.

---
Being able to differentiate between being pussywhipped and not being
pussywhipped is hardly a criterion for the determination of the
existence of affection.
---

>I think women are wonderful, especially my wife. I do things for her
>because I like her.

---
So, instead of "have to be nice" you meant "want to be nice"?

--
JF


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.