> <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
> >On Oct 5, 10:08 pm, Lord Valve <detri...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> brent wrote:
> >> > I certainly enjoyed the debate the other night. How refreshing that
> >> > the moderator did not limit the debate to the democrat talking points
> >> > (e.g... war on women and 47%)! I have known in my gut that president
> >> > empty chair is not very bright and it was ENJOYABLE to see him raw and
> >> > exposed without the media infrastructure propping him up. Watching
> >> > MSNBC after the debate had me giggling like a teenage girl all night
> >> > long.

> >Romney is a plausible liar, and they do do well with teenage girls and
> >other people who are relatively easy to deceive.

> >> However anyone wants to spin it, this fact abides:
> >> Romney could step into the CEO spot of any major
> >> corporation on this planet and be up to speed in
> >> less than a week.

> >Not in Germany, where the CEO is expected to know a fair bit about the
> >company's products and how they work, or in fact any place where the
> >CEO is expected to know anything about the company, as opposed to
> >reading stuff off a prompter and looking impressive.

> >> O'Butthole, on the other hand,
> >> wouldn't even be qualified to work in the mail room.

> >Wrong skin colour?

> >> And since the business of America is business...

> >Granting that the US has been running a massive balance of payments
> >deficit since Regan was president, the "business" of American now
> >seems to be borrowing money from other countries to pay for its
> >expensive oil habit.

> >> well, you'd think even libtards could figure it out,
> >> but despite their constant claims of mental superiority,
> >> they're still buying that lame hopey-changey horseshit.

> >On the other hand, Mitt Romney's claim to business expertise is a bit
> >thin. He didn't create new businesses,

> Wrong, as usual.

> Staples stores are fun.