I am trying to build a circuit on an existing design that calls for an
op-amp MC34071AP but this op-amp seems hard to find and not sold in
small quantites, at most I only need 4. If anyone knows a good source
for it or can recommend a replacement op-amp with very similar
properties it would be appreciated.
thanks,
Rich.
axawire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build a circuit on an existing design that calls for an
> op-amp MC34071AP
What's the design ? Is it a secret ?
Graham
From TI, TL071
Or substitute MC34081 -82, -84, or TL081
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
** Thompson must be on drugs.
The MC34071A is a bipolar, wide operating voltage range, single supply
type.
http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets2/c/0hp158dg2t99hlku34wh283kh4fy.pdf
Not a BI-FET op-amp.
....... Phil
There is the TI TL3472 which is a duplicate design with slight variation
in some of the max ratings, probably more realistic, and available in
small quantities from Mouser.
Oooops! Looks I remembered incorrectly :-(
TL071 is just a poorer spec'd version of TL081 which is the same as
MOTO's MC34081
So I did a boo boo and extrapolated MC34071 to TL071, etc :-(
Jim Thompson wrote:
> TL071 is just a poorer spec'd version of TL081
Where on earth did you get a hare-brained idea like that ?
> which is the same as MOTO's MC34081
Motorola were never able to make a decent bifet op-amp to save themselves.
Graham
Sorry took so long to respond.
No its not a secret, its the circuit digram from the bottom of this
web page:
Thanks, im going to get one of those and see if it works for me.
Which is "DEVICE NOT RECOMMENDED FOR NEW DESIGN"
What!? Huh? Has ON Semi discontinued all their
JFET opamps? Sheesh, stick with TI.
> TL071 is just a poorer spec'd version of TL081
Actually I think it's the other way round.
robert
Robert Latest wrote:
Yes.
Graham