Received: by 10.66.86.67 with SMTP id n3mr2030545paz.43.1349625299884;
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: t10ni23619461pbh.0!nntp.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Women Under Islam
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:55:00 -0400
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <1e93789qo2r2ueg9ncd65ptbr3fc9ddtu3@4ax.com>
References: <0m9n68hdrcufm22ve4c4g7t37ue7jpldrm@4ax.com> <b8ln68ts85ee0uj059goa1njk54mjh7n3n@4ax.com> <jtgo68l9qppsqugpefoel52suvb1v7bfc2@4ax.com> <4ino68p70q9cdplu4c2lpd0v6ig0s19sn5@4ax.com> <q3so681ighorbjlr1r94oppaub1bbeaveh@4ax.com> <n3jp68hl2q77ufcpb2ekv4shegneleoscl@4ax.com> <tmlp68lag154khqdlae65kvkicporpqvfo@4ax.com> <4onr68dp8tjkduo21gce0b78k59bdqpdh5@4ax.com> <u1as68tpobshlkp4i4a2pjlqqtvhb75scj@4ax.com> <hevt685aofk3qs15k3mj54m0bv15r75tih@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net xYL1FLy1NgaTIDuYfmlcRQYMYSS6PKVMdnp8reImdKETRqPkmM
Cancel-Lock: sha1:udyy9BvdnRy7awC8vLdYiBuSF4o=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-Received-Bytes: 3492
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:38:06 -0500, John Fields
<jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:23:01 -0400, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:14:48 -0500, John Fields
>><jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:27:28 -0400, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>><k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:55:26 -0500, John Fields
>>>><jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:06:54 -0400, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>>>><k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:53:28 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>><jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:59:34 -0700, John Larkin
>>>>>>><jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I didn't insult the lady. I assumed that she, like most women, was
>>>>>>>>indeed smarter and more selective than the guys who have anonymous sex
>>>>>>>>in public parks, or, as JF delicately expresses it, "experience joy"
>>>>>>>>there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>---
>>>>>>>I didn't mention sexual preference, you did, and as usual, seem to
>>>>>>>think that every encounter not specifically identified as being
>>>>>>>heterosexual _must_ be homosexual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Interesting that no one brought up homosexual sex but you thought you needed
>>>>>>to.
>>>>>
>>>>>---
>>>>>You must have either missed Larkin's earlier homosexual slur or
>>>>>ignored it for your own porpoises - something fishy there -
>>>>>---
>>>>
>>>>It's interesting that you see queers who aren't there.  Maybe your mirror is a
>>>>bit sensitive.
>>>
>>>---
>>>Or yours not at all selective.
>>>--- 
>>
>>Idiot, we're talking about *you*.
>
>---
>Whoosh...
>---
>
>>>>>>>Strange little mind-set.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>>---
>>>>>As is your adjudication.
>>>>
>>>>You like big words.  Perhaps you should get a dictionary to go with your
>>>>"vocabulary".
>>>
>>>---
>>>I like words, and sometimes the big ones can nail meaning exquisitely
>>>without the peening required from littler ones.
>>
>>You really need to invest in a dictionary, then.
>
>---
>I have several, plus the ones on the web, while you seem unable or
>unwilling to access any of them.

Then learn how to use them, moron.