Message from discussion Ta-da!
Received: by 10.181.11.234 with SMTP id el10mr1956645wid.2.1349658571040;
Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Mueller <wrongn...@nospam.com>
Subject: Re: Ta-da!
User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 926a150
Date: 08 Oct 2012 01:09:30 GMT
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:59:17 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
> Critiques, suggestions welcome...
> Sand in air ignored.
> ...Jim Thompson
Your simulation doesn't include your power input source, presumably a
rectifier, based on your label. You also don't show us what the input
waveform is (half wave or full wave?) or what the impedance from the
input to common is (does it have a DC return?). All of these affect the
performance of the circuit and need to be included in the simulation.
It would also help if you identified how you got the results,
specifically, which of the many test points shown on the schematic were
used for each plot. You know these things but we can only guess.
Jim Mueller wrongn...@nospam.com
To get my real email address, replace wrongname with dadoheadman.
Then replace nospam with fastmail. Lastly, replace com with us.