OT: Mark My Words
Jon Slaughter
like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or tricked by bush
just like with the war. It's also funny how they are trying to bully those
against it into going for it. Specially with McCain who is wanting to do the
right thing but is getting it from both sides as usual. We need to hold
these guys accountable but I guess it's too late for that.
Charles
"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7UCk.1393$as4...@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
Spend and blame republicans have long ago surpassed the tax and spend
democrats.
McCain is into the early stages of senility. God bless him for what he is
(a war hero and a patriot).
However, turn the country over to him and clueless Sarah; I think not.
Jon Slaughter
"Charles" <charles...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:opydnTYyteYoikHV...@comcast.com...
Are you a moron? Serious? Do you vote with your head up your ass? I guess
because you think by making personal attacks against someone it means your
somehow right? Get a fucking clue! (or better yet get a brain!)
Charles
"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:X2VCk.1761$yr3....@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
Of course I am a moron to post here. The only personal attacks in this
thread have been against me by you.
You have been cheated by those who offered that they were actually educating
you. You have no education. You have only very biased training. You are a
narrow-minded twit.
Charles
Godamned idiot and clueless bastard. How lovely! Anyone here interested in
an actual discussion?
Michael A. Terrell
So you were turned out to pasture, yet mcCain is still working? It
sounds like sour grapes to me..
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.
Jon Slaughter
Just like a liberal... It's ok for you to use personal attacks on one's
character but the same tactic cannot be used against you. It's hypocrisy
beyond belief.
Jon Slaughter
Oh... and your on my ignore list... not that it matters but at least I won't
have to wade through your drool.
mpm
> Specially with McCain who is wanting to do the
McCain's in a no-win position on this one.
Though you could argue we're all in a no-win here, only I don't
understand the rush unless one of the truly large banks is ready to
fold. (CItiGroup, Chase, BofA, etc..)
What I do find incredibly stupid is McCain's "razzle-dazzle" (to use a
Chris Matthews Hardball term). I can't think of a single compelling
reason to "suspend" his presidential campaign.
If the deal falls apart, does he magically re-start his campaign,
prior principles be damned?
If the deal is delayed, does he re-start having not accomplished what
he set out to do? And thus come across as a failure.?
Besides, Barney Frank said a compromise deal was progressing fine
without him (and Obama).
And why take the heat? Astoundingly poor judgement in my opinion.
$700B bailout in Washington? STAY CLEAR.
Doesn't take a political genius to figure that out.
Like we need an Arizona senator to fall on the gernade for us?
The vote of one Senator will matter exactly 1%. A little less than
that if Cheney's included.
Not McCain though. He's sees a hornet's nest and immediately decides
he's the only one in Washington with a stick. What an idiot. And
from today's reporting, it seems his arrival has done little more than
to inject politics into the whole mess. (Not that I guess that
matters.) Apparently, he knows very little about the subject matter,
barely even speaking at the very meeting that supposedly caused him to
drop everything and rush back to Washington. (Stopping at the Clinton
Global thing for a little campaigning first, though.)
What's he going to say anyway: "The fundamentals of our economy are
strong?"
I don't know what worse: The message or the messenger? Maybe the
dolts who would listen to it in the first place?
I like Matthew's assessment of Razzle-Dazzle.
We saw it with the Palin pick, his campaign suspension, and maybe
tomorrow as a no-show at the debate.(?)
But I guess if you don't know how to use e-mail (assuming that's
true?), it would at least explain the campaign suspension. Obama
seems much better able to multi-task, but then he's 30 years younger
and probably has a lot more stamina. I mean, you can only work a 72
year man so hard...
-mpm
Michael A. Terrell
According to one news report, McCain can't use a computer or
typewriter after having his arms broken repeatedly by the Vietnamese in
their POw camp. The bones weren't properly set, and he got no medical
attention, so he literally can't type.
MooseFET
> Godamned idiot and clueless bastard. How lovely! Anyone here interested in
> an actual discussion?
StickThatIn... is one of the many names that Always Wrong posts
under. The fact that he opposes Obama is the best pro Obama statement
that could ever be made in this or any other news group.
IMO: The bail out is a bad idea, at least the Paulson version is. It
rewards the taking of unreasonable risks by the very people who should
know better. The bail out is written like "Give me 700 Billion in
unmarked bills or the economy gets it". No oversight or review by
anyone is allowed.
700 Billion is more than enough to buy up all of the mortgages that
are in trouble and rewrite them as fixed. Many would be paid off so
far less than the 700 billion would be lost in the process. Buying up
the mortgages would free up the money for the lenders so the problem
would be solved. The people holding the 6 levels removed stuff would
be stuck but they are the ones who were taking the silly risks so why
not let them take a hit.
MooseFET
wrote:
We have known for a long time that he can't raise his arms. It
doesn't make sense that this detail would be withheld until now. I
think we can discount this story.
BTW: My mother has a lot of years on McCain and she sends me e-mail.
She types with one finger and doesn't use the shift key very often but
since the period and comma don't need a shift, you wouldn't know her
age from what she writes.
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
> Charles wrote:
>
> > "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:T7UCk.1393$as4...@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> > > If the bailout ends up being a mistake all those democrats that are acting
> > > like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or tricked by
> > > bush just like with the war. It's also funny how they are trying to bully
> > > those against it into going for it. Specially with McCain who is wanting
> > > to do the right thing but is getting it from both sides as usual. We need
> > > to hold these guys accountable but I guess it's too late for that.
>
> > Spend and blame republicans have long ago surpassed the tax and spend
> > democrats.
>
> > McCain is into the early stages of senility. God bless him for what he is
> > (a war hero and a patriot).
>
> > However, turn the country over to him and clueless Sarah; I think not.
>
> sounds like sour grapes to me..
Most things sound like sour grapes to Mike Terrell, who isn't working
either, though he staunchly claims that this is because of his
defective health. He may in fact have real health problems, but since
he chooses not to believe anybody else's excuses for being out of
work, we are obliged to be equally sceptical about his story.
It is hard to swallow McCain's claim to be intent on serving his
countrymen when he proposes to lumber them with a Sarah Palin as Vice-
President - it did win him a short burst of publicity in the media,
and did cement his grip on the mindless right wing but it does make
him look like a desperate opportunist, anything but presidential.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
> "Charles" <charlesschu...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:fbSdnVralJCygkHV...@comcast.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:X2VCk.1761$yr3....@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> >> "Charles" <charlesschu...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>news:opydnTYyteYoikHV...@comcast.com...
>
> >>> "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:T7UCk.1393$as4...@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >>>> If the bailout ends up being a mistake all those democrats that are
> >>>> acting like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or
> >>>> tricked by bush just like with the war. It's also funny how they are
> >>>> trying to bully those against it into going for it. Specially with
> >>>> McCain who is wanting to do the right thing but is getting it from both
> >>>> sides as usual. We need to hold these guys accountable but I guess
> >>>> it's too late for that.
>
> >>> Spend and blame republicans have long ago surpassed the tax and spend
> >>> democrats.
>
> >>> McCain is into the early stages of senility. God bless him for what he
> >>> is (a war hero and a patriot).
>
> >>> However, turn the country over to him and clueless Sarah; I think not.
>
> >> Are you a moron? Serious? Do you vote with your head up your ass? I guess
> >> because you think by making personal attacks against someone it means
> >> your somehow right? Get a fucking clue! (or better yet get a brain!)
>
> > Of course I am a moron to post here. The only personal attacks in this
> > thread have been against me by you.
>
> > You have been cheated by those who offered that they were actually
> > educating you. You have no education. You have only very biased
> > training. You are a narrow-minded twit.
>
> Just like a liberal... It's ok for you to use personal attacks on one's
> character but the same tactic cannot be used against you. It's hypocrisy
> beyond belief.
To give Charles his due, he wasn't attacking your character, or
McCain's, he was merely expressing doubts about McCain's competence.
McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate is decidedly
questionable.
I'd blame desperation rather than senility. Early Alzheimer's is
detectable long before there is any overt loss of competence - Brian
Butterworth picked up early signsof Regan's Alzheimer's when Regan was
running for his second term - so I'd imagine that somebody on McCain's
team has ran the same set of tests on McCain before they started
spending serious money on his presidential campaign.
Be that as it may, the competence of a potential president is always a
relevant question, and such questions can't be derided as a "personal
attack on his character".
Your own attack on Charles is less defensible. We all know that you
can't do reasoned argument, which doesn't leave you many other
options, and it clear that he was wasting his time by pointing out a
few of your numerous intellectual defects, but you are in no position
to call him a hypocrite for reminding us all what a dim and shallow
twit you are.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Michael A. Terrell
That's what you want to beleive.
Results 1 - 10 of about 259,000 for Mccain can't type news. (0.32
seconds)
MooseFET
>
> Results 1 - 10 of about 259,000 for Mccain can't type news. (0.32
> seconds)
I had already done that search and I also had looked at the date of
the pages where I could find dates. I found none that were from
before 2008. Did you find any?
Jim Thompson
>
>mpm wrote:
Yep. Just watch how much effort it takes him to just shakes hands :-(
As for being able to use a PC... is that a useful skill? That's what
doobies and grunts are for ;-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Liberalism is a persistent vegetative state
Frithiof Jensen
"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:T7UCk.1393$as4...@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
How will anyone know if the package "works" or not? The US economy is
basically screwed anyway!
Of course "everyone" wants to be "in on it": Finance ministry becomes a
dictatorship with 700 billion, no strings attached and no nasty
accountability nor any oversight into whatever happened to the stash and it
can be festooned with pork and graft before passing - but true to
US-leadership-form nobody want to actually stand up and own the
responsibility.
mpm
> We have known for a long time that he can't raise his arms. �It
> doesn't make sense that this detail would be withheld until now. �I
> think we can discount this story.
Ever hear of speech-to-text software (Dragon Naturally Speaking, for
example)?
Lord knows McCain can drone on.....
Even Stephen Hawking could "type".
What's McSame's excuse?
-mpm
mpm
> It is hard to swallow McCain's claim to be intent on serving his
> countrymen when he proposes to lumber them with a Sarah Palin as Vice-
> President - it did win him a short burst of publicity in the media,
> and did cement his grip on the mindless right wing but it does make
> him look like a desperate opportunist, anything but presidential.
translation: "razzle-dazzle"
Jim Thompson
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmi...@aol.com>
wrote:
>On Sep 26, 2:53?am, MooseFET <kensm...@rahul.net> wrote:
>
>> We have known for a long time that he can't raise his arms. ?It
>> doesn't make sense that this detail would be withheld until now. ?I
>> think we can discount this story.
>
>
>Ever hear of speech-to-text software (Dragon Naturally Speaking, for
>example)?
>Lord knows McCain can drone on.....
>
>Even Stephen Hawking could "type".
>What's McSame's excuse?
>
>-mpm
>
Go fuck yourself... it's the best you'll ever get ;-)
mpm
Web-Site.com>
You plan on watching the debate tonight?
How long until the topic morphs to the economy...
Should be interesting.
Presumably, they cannot (or should not) say things that will wreck the
markets come Monday...
Michael A. Terrell
MooseFET wrote:
>
> I had already done that search and I also had looked at the date of
> the pages where I could find dates. I found none that were from
> before 2008. Did you find any?
What does it matter? Did you find any from Obama condemning him for
it prior to 2008? He has a staff that handles his clerical work, like
any other politician at that level. I would bet that it is more than a
full time job for one person, and that most are handled by his staff.
Only those that truly require his attention need to hit his desk.
Michael A. Terrell
He doesn't need an excuse. I'm sure that he doesn't empty the trash
cans or sweep the floors in his offices, either.
Do you think Steven Hawkings could handle 100 emails a day? He has
other things to do, and hires people to do clerical work. I see a lot
of Veterans his age that can't, or won't use a computer. There are days
when I'm in too much pain to use one myself, and I'm a disabled Veteran
in my 50s.
Charles
"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ZoWCk.1490$Ws1....@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Oh... and your on my ignore list... not that it matters but at least I
> won't have to wade through your drool.
Bye.
mpm
<Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmill...@aol.com> wrote:
Dude, whatever you're on, you need to up the dosage.
bill....@ieee.org
<Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:27:33 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
> >To give Charles his due, he wasn't attacking your character, or
> >McCain's, he was merely expressing doubts about McCain's competence.
> >McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate is decidedly
> >questionable.
>
> You're an idiot. She is more ready for the post than ANY of the
> remaining three.
Only if you really fancy another right-wing nitwit in the job.
Considering the damage done by the current rightwing nitwit you'd have
to be pretty stupid to want another, but half the population does have
a sub-average IQ.
<snipped subsequent evidence of mental retardation>
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
<Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:27:33 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
> >can't do reasoned argument,
>
> "We all know..."?
Perhaps I should have said "everybody here who can do reasoned
argment"
<snip>
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
JimW52
> If the bailout ends up being a mistake all those democrats that are
> acting like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or
> tricked by bush just like with the war. It's also funny how they are
> trying to bully those against it into going for it. Specially with
> McCain who is wanting to do the right thing but is getting it from
> both sides as usual. We need to hold these guys accountable but I
> guess it's too late for that.
>
>
1/10. Must try harder.
Jim
default
<Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>If the bailout ends up being a mistake all those democrats that are acting
>like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or tricked by bush
>just like with the war. It's also funny how they are trying to bully those
>against it into going for it. Specially with McCain who is wanting to do the
>right thing but is getting it from both sides as usual. We need to hold
>these guys accountable but I guess it's too late for that.
>
I never expected to see ditto heads bog on this one. One wonders what
alternative they offer? The only things I've heard are condemnation
of the bailout from them, and a few weasel word generalizations.
Perhaps its just posturing so they have someone to blame when things
turn sour.
--
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
MooseFET
wrote:
> MooseFET wrote:
>
> > I had already done that search and I also had looked at the date of
> > the pages where I could find dates. I found none that were from
> > before 2008. Did you find any?
>
> What does it matter? Did you find any from Obama condemning him for
> it prior to 2008? He has a staff that handles his clerical work, like
> any other politician at that level. I would bet that it is more than a
> full time job for one person, and that most are handled by his staff.
> Only those that truly require his attention need to hit his desk.
Many politicians communicate with their staff via email. It really is
a small matter but "doesn't know how to" means something different
from "can't".
Kris Krieger
news:ecasd4po424rnu14u...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:19:20 -0500, "Jon Slaughter"
> <Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>If the bailout ends up being a mistake all those democrats that are
>>acting like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or
>>tricked by bush just like with the war. It's also funny how they are
>>trying to bully those against it into going for it. Specially with
>>McCain who is wanting to do the right thing but is getting it from both
>>sides as usual. We need to hold these guys accountable but I guess it's
>>too late for that.
>>
> I never expected to see ditto heads bog on this one. One wonders what
> alternative they offer? The only things I've heard are condemnation
> of the bailout from them, and a few weasel word generalizations.
>
> Perhaps its just posturing so they have someone to blame when things
> turn sour.
THe problem is that the critics offer **NO** alternative, or else they've
wanted to do things that are unworkable.
Trying to pin down who is accountable is a bit like trying to figure out
which snowflake started the avalanche. It was a lot of flakes, one atop the
other, accumulating over time. Some were lazy, a great many (regardless of
class) were greedy, figured they could game the system and make a killing.
warm'n'flat
<Zarat...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:05:52 +0200, "Frithiof Jensen"
><frithio...@diespammerdie.jensen.tdcadsl.dk> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Sl...@Hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
>>news:T7UCk.1393$as4...@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> If the bailout ends up being a mistake all those democrats that are acting
>>> like lunatics now will be saying they were conned into it or tricked by
>>> bush just like with the war. It's also funny how they are trying to bully
>>> those against it into going for it. Specially with McCain who is wanting
>>> to do the right thing but is getting it from both sides as usual. We need
>>> to hold these guys accountable but I guess it's too late for that.
>>
>>How will anyone know if the package "works" or not? The US economy is
>>basically screwed anyway!
>>
>
> Well, here is one man that has half a clue about what is going on.
>
>
> I cannot help but remember the line from "Down Periscope"...
>
> "Prepare To Be Boarded"
>
> Then, the image of the NYPD broomstick handle, completely with fresh,
>huge knife cut splinters, comes to mind.
>
> The fucking price of EVERYTHING is going to go up, no matter what the
>"too late now" motherfuckers do!
>
>>Of course "everyone" wants to be "in on it":
>
> I want some of them to be "in it"... PRISON.
>
>> Finance ministry becomes a
>>dictatorship with 700 billion, no strings attached and no nasty
>>accountability nor any oversight into whatever happened to the stash and it
>>can be festooned with pork and graft before passing - but true to
>>US-leadership-form nobody want to actually stand up and own the
>>responsibility.
>
> Put me in office. I won't just step on toes... I'll wear fucking meat
>cleavers as fucking platform shoes.
>
> I am related to Garfield... The bastards would have me dead inside a
>week.
>
> Oh, and I would also take Palin as a sidekick. I don't care what
>anybody says... that gal is goin' places.
>
> She carries more charisma than the Gubernator did, and look what
>happened to get him into office.
>
> Before that, however... we are in for a bumpy ride.
>
> BOOM... Iran.... BOOM N. Korea!
>
> It IS coming, folks.
>
> Their nuclear plants, not the people.
>
> Of course catching that fucking bearded Hitler standing in front of a
>couple million idiotic USA hating fanatics with a nice, left over Neutron
>bomb isn't a bad idea either.
>
> We should let Russia do it, as they are hard hit as well, and they
>haven't gotten to play with their toys yet. They should say Fuck being
>friends with Iran... win over the entire world's favor by wiping the
>fucking bearded Hitler off the face of the earth... before the dirty
>bastard gets a bomb.
Don't worry, the nurse will soon be here with your medication and
strait jacket.
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
<warm'n'fl...@rabbit.com.au> wrote:
>Don't worry, the nurse will soon be here with your medication and
>strait jacket.
You're an idiot. Go be a retarded twit somewhere else.
JosephKK
<To-Email-Use-Th...@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>
>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmi...@aol.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sep 26, 2:53?am, MooseFET <kensm...@rahul.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We have known for a long time that he can't raise his arms. ?It
>>> doesn't make sense that this detail would be withheld until now. ?I
>>> think we can discount this story.
>>
>>
>>Ever hear of speech-to-text software (Dragon Naturally Speaking, for
>>example)?
>>Lord knows McCain can drone on.....
>>
>>Even Stephen Hawking could "type".
>>What's McSame's excuse?
>>
>>-mpm
>>
>
>Go fuck yourself... it's the best you'll ever get ;-)
>
> ...Jim Thompson
Gosh, nothing but ad hominem. And you have been trying to sell that
you are above such pettiness.
RoyLFuchs
wrote:
Yes, and I have been trying to tell you dopes that NONE of you are where
you think you are.
Jim Thompson
>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:13:10 -0700, Jim Thompson
><To-Email-Use-Th...@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmi...@aol.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sep 26, 2:53?am, MooseFET <kensm...@rahul.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have known for a long time that he can't raise his arms. ?It
>>>> doesn't make sense that this detail would be withheld until now. ?I
>>>> think we can discount this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>Ever hear of speech-to-text software (Dragon Naturally Speaking, for
>>>example)?
>>>Lord knows McCain can drone on.....
>>>
>>>Even Stephen Hawking could "type".
>>>What's McSame's excuse?
>>>
>>>-mpm
>>>
>>
>>Go fuck yourself... it's the best you'll ever get ;-)
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
>Gosh, nothing but ad hominem. And you have been trying to sell that
>you are above such pettiness.
>
With "mpm" I have to make exceptions ;-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Liberalism is a persistent vegetative state
Bill Sloman
"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-Th...@My-Web-Site.com> schreef in
bericht news:fgufe4pq0etg5glo3...@4ax.com...
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:08:54 -0700, JosephKK <quiett...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:13:10 -0700, Jim Thompson
>><To-Email-Use-Th...@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmi...@aol.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sep 26, 2:53?am, MooseFET <kensm...@rahul.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We have known for a long time that he can't raise his arms. ?It
>>>>> doesn't make sense that this detail would be withheld until now. ?I
>>>>> think we can discount this story.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ever hear of speech-to-text software (Dragon Naturally Speaking, for
>>>>example)?
>>>>Lord knows McCain can drone on.....
>>>>
>>>>Even Stephen Hawking could "type".
>>>>What's McSame's excuse?
>>>>
>>>>-mpm
>>>>
>>>
>>>Go fuck yourself... it's the best you'll ever get ;-)
>>>
>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>
>>Gosh, nothing but ad hominem. And you have been trying to sell that
>>you are above such pettiness.
>>
>
> With "mpm" I have to make exceptions ;-)
Jim does seem to make a lot of exceptions, usually - as here - shortly after
he has posted something exceptionally stupid and been ticked off for it.
And while supporting McSame's candidacy is pretty stupid, that wouldn't have
registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Don Bowey
48e89714$0$27217$ba62...@text.nova.planet.nl, "Bill Sloman"
<bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
(snip)
> Jim does seem to make a lot of exceptions, usually - as here - shortly after
> he has posted something exceptionally stupid and been ticked off for it.
> And while supporting McSame's candidacy is pretty stupid, that wouldn't have
> registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
Although I think Jim is an ass and I choose to not read his posts, he IS a
citizen of the US and he is entitled to his views on US politics regardless
of his ugly attitude.
But I'd like to know where the hell you get off saying support by a US
citizen for either major candidate is "stupid." When you take up
citizenship here, you may then be entitled to spout your opinions.
Until then STFU. IOW, keep your opinions to yourself.
Bill Sloman
"Don Bowey" <dbo...@comcast.net> schreef in bericht
news:C50E0B62.C5E79%dbo...@comcast.net...
U.S. residents aren't really aware of the world outside their borders. For a
long time you have been able to get away with this, but the rest of the
world is steadily catching up - now that you owe us 2601.8 billion dollars
(including 500-odd billion each to China and Japan) you should start
wondering what might happen if we lowered the boom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt
The rest of world is much more interested in what goes on within the United
States - for one thing, if you elect another economically ignorant
Republican, our chances of eventually getting our money back will be
seriously diminished, and if he were as war-like and diplomatically inept as
his predecessor we would have even more problems with justifiably peevish
Arabs.
Consequently the rest of the world has every reason to prefer Barak Obama to
John McCain, and if you knew what was good for you - Jim clearly doesn't -
you should too,
http://www.theworldwantsobama.org/2008/07/obama-is-five-times-more-popular-than.html
and I can't see any good reason for not telling you so.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Don Bowey
48e8d52e$0$27209$ba62...@text.nova.planet.nl, "Bill Sloman"
<bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> "Don Bowey" <dbo...@comcast.net> schreef in bericht
> news:C50E0B62.C5E79%dbo...@comcast.net...
>> On 10/5/08 3:29 AM, in article
>> 48e89714$0$27217$ba62...@text.nova.planet.nl, "Bill Sloman"
>> <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> Jim does seem to make a lot of exceptions, usually - as here - shortly
>>> after
>>> he has posted something exceptionally stupid and been ticked off for it.
>>> And while supporting McSame's candidacy is pretty stupid, that wouldn't
>>> have
>>> registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
>>
>> Although I think Jim is an ass and I choose to not read his posts, he IS a
>> citizen of the US and he is entitled to his views on US politics
>> regardless
>> of his ugly attitude.
>>
>> But I'd like to know where the hell you get off saying support by a US
>> citizen for either major candidate is "stupid." When you take up
>> citizenship here, you may then be entitled to spout your opinions.
>>
>> Until then STFU. IOW, keep your opinions to yourself.
>
> U.S. residents aren't really aware of the world outside their borders.
You don't know of what US residents are and are not aware. OTOH some of us
are aware you are an egotistical jerk.
> For a
> long time you have been able to get away with this, but the rest of the
> world is steadily catching up - now that you owe us 2601.8 billion dollars
> (including 500-odd billion each to China and Japan) you should start
> wondering what might happen if we lowered the boom.
Gee...... Thanks for your concern. I'm sure in your imagination, that
nobody other than yourself are aware of foreign investment in the US and
balance of trade issues. You're an egotistical jerk.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt
>
> The rest of world is much more interested in what goes on within the United
> States - for one thing, if you elect another economically ignorant
> Republican, our chances of eventually getting our money back will be
> seriously diminished, and if he were as war-like and diplomatically inept as
> his predecessor we would have even more problems with justifiably peevish
> Arabs.
If you really are worried, do something about it within your own government.
Your useless drivel here doesn't improve anything and it irritates the
natives.
>
> Consequently the rest of the world has every reason to prefer Barak Obama to
> John McCain, and if you knew what was good for you - Jim clearly doesn't -
> you should too,
Prefer who you will, just don't think you need to issue a new blog about it
every time you have a new jerkoff thought.
>
> http://www.theworldwantsobama.org/2008/07/obama-is-five-times-more-popular-tha
> n.html
>
> and I can't see any good reason for not telling you so.
I can. You're a useless boor on a couple counts.
1. You snipe constantly, which is counterproductive.
2. You would rather sit at your computer and do NOTHING productive, than to
get off your butt and work at something productive, as noted above.
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
wrote:
> McSame's
Well, one thing the group does know is that you haven't changed. You
are still McRetarded.
UltimatePatriot
wrote:
>U.S. residents aren't really aware of the world outside their borders.
You are dumber than pond scum.
Michael A. Terrell
You should start wondering what would happen if you tried.
>
> Gee...... Thanks for your concern. I'm sure in your imagination, that
> nobody other than yourself are aware of foreign investment in the US and
> balance of trade issues. You're an egotistical jerk.
>
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt
> >
> > The rest of world is much more interested in what goes on within the United
> > States - for one thing, if you elect another economically ignorant
> > Republican, our chances of eventually getting our money back will be
> > seriously diminished, and if he were as war-like and diplomatically inept as
> > his predecessor we would have even more problems with justifiably peevish
> > Arabs.
>
> If you really are worried, do something about it within your own government.
> Your useless drivel here doesn't improve anything and it irritates the
> natives.
>
> >
> > Consequently the rest of the world has every reason to prefer Barak Obama to
> > John McCain, and if you knew what was good for you - Jim clearly doesn't -
> > you should too,
Of course they prefer Obama. They want us to have a weak leader who
doesn't do anything. Then we would be like Europe, and the rest of the
wqorld.
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
> Don Bowey wrote:
>
> > On 10/5/08 7:54 AM, in article
> > <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> > > "Don Bowey" <dbo...@comcast.net> schreef in bericht
> > >news:C50E0B62.C5E79%dbo...@comcast.net...
> > >> On 10/5/08 3:29 AM, in article
Better a weak leader who doesn't do anything stupid than the twit
you've had for the last eight disasterous years - Aesops frogs rightly
preferred King Log to King Stork. And you could do with being a bit
more like Europe - we spend only 8% of our GNP on health care and get
better outcomes for the population as a whole than you get even though
you spend 14% of your GNP on health care.
Not that Obama actually look as if he'd be a weak leader - quite the
reverse. His track record so far is impressive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
And do you really want John McCain exercising his enthusiasm for high-
stakes gambling in the White House?
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
<Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:29:41 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org>
> wrote:
>
> > McSame's
>
> Well, one thing the group does know is that you haven't changed. You
> are still McRetarded.
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt has assessed my intelligence and finds
that it doesn't meet his stringent standards, What a pity. He might be
using the same kind of crap test that told Eeyore that he had a genius-
level IQ, but the odds are that he is just following Jim Thompson's
example in claiming that anybody who disagrees with him has to be
stupid, where a more objective observer would say "well-informed".
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:54:40 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org>
> wrote:
>
> >U.S. residents aren't really aware of the world outside their borders.
>
> You are dumber than pond scum.
UltimatePatriot would like to think so, but isn't equipped to make any
kind of persuasive case to support this proposition - or anything else
that he's posted.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
>
>
>
>
>
> <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> > "Don Bowey" <dbo...@comcast.net> schreef in bericht
> >news:C50E0B62.C5E79%dbo...@comcast.net...
> >> On 10/5/08 3:29 AM, in article
> >> <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> >> (snip)
>
> >>> Jim does seem to make a lot of exceptions, usually - as here - shortly
> >>> after
> >>> he has posted something exceptionally stupid and been ticked off for it.
> >>> And while supporting McSame's candidacy is pretty stupid, that wouldn't
> >>> have
> >>> registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
>
> >> Although I think Jim is an ass and I choose to not read his posts, he IS a
> >> citizen of the US and he is entitled to his views on US politics
> >> regardless
> >> of his ugly attitude.
>
> >> But I'd like to know where the hell you get off saying support by a US
> >> citizen for either major candidate is "stupid." When you take up
> >> citizenship here, you may then be entitled to spout your opinions.
>
> >> Until then STFU. IOW, keep your opinions to yourself.
>
> > U.S. residents aren't really aware of the world outside their borders.
>
> You don't know of what US residents are and are not aware. OTOH some of us
> are aware you are an egotistical jerk.
I see your comments here and I've read your newspapers - you really
don't know much about the world outside your borders. If you did know
a bit more you might appreciate how much better other countries run
things like health care, market regulation, defence procurement and
electing a representative government.
You seem to think that only an egotistical jerk would point this out,
presumably because you think that the USA is perfect in every respect
(which seems to be taught at every American primary school) and nobody
should be so bumptious as to disagree.
This is merely parochial complacence - get out and learn something.
Here's a place to start
http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debt-packages/2007/07/23/
Don Bowey
4b958048-ae11-4553...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
"bill....@ieee.org" <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
Well, that was a useless self-serving load of nothing.
Do I need to define egotistical for you? If not, just look it up and note
how well it fits you.
Don Bowey
4b958048-ae11-4553...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
"bill....@ieee.org" <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
(snip)
> I see your comments here and I've read your newspapers - you really
> don't know much about the world outside your borders. If you did know
> a bit more you might appreciate how much better other countries run
> things like health care, market regulation, defence procurement and
> electing a representative government.
>
> You seem to think that only an egotistical jerk would point this out,
> presumably because you think that the USA is perfect in every respect
> (which seems to be taught at every American primary school) and nobody
> should be so bumptious as to disagree.
>
> This is merely parochial complacence - get out and learn something.
> Here's a place to start
>
> http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debt-packages/2007/07/23/
You really have a sick view of what constitutes news to provide that
mindless link.
UltimatePatriot
No, you fucking retard!
NOTE exactly what I quoted, you stupid twit!
That has to do with YOUR stupid mindset, and I could give a shit what
the other guy that also knows that you're a goddamned retard thinks. Dig,
dipshit?
Saying "McSame" is "well informed"? I think you are a child, at best,
in that case. Go away, child, you have no business here with the adults.
UltimatePatriot
If ever there was a case of: Pot... Kettle... Black... it is here in
your post.
UltimatePatriot
>I see your comments here and I've read your newspapers - you really
>don't know much about the world outside your borders.
Do you really think that the dopes that write some of our newspapers
are representative of "US Residents" thinking or experience in any way,
shape or form? They are not, and you are stupid to think they are.
bill....@ieee.org
http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/egotistical
I presume that you'd like to think that I've got "an exaggerated
sense of self-importance : conceit".
While I concede that I'm failing to treat your opinions with the
respect you feel that they deserve, you should realise that dismissing
an arguments as "a useless self-serving load of nothing" merely
signifies that you can't come up with a persuasive counter-argument,
which means that you can't defend your own opinions and haven't earned
a scintilla of respect.
I reacting to your post at all I'm demonstrating an unhealthy lack of
self-respect - showing that I'm not as egotistical as I ought to be.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
>
> "bill.slo...@ieee.org" <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> > I see your comments here and I've read your newspapers - you really
> > don't know much about the world outside your borders. If you did know
> > a bit more you might appreciate how much better other countries run
> > things like health care, market regulation, defence procurement and
> > electing a representative government.
>
> > You seem to think that only an egotistical jerk would point this out,
> > presumably because you think that the USA is perfect in every respect
> > (which seems to be taught at every American primary school) and nobody
> > should be so bumptious as to disagree.
>
> > This is merely parochial complacence - get out and learn something.
> > Here's a place to start
>
> >http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debt-packages/2007/07/23/
>
> You really have a sick view of what constitutes news to provide that
> mindless link.
Trying looking up a definition of "mindless"
http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/mindlessly
Only a mindless twit could fail to appreciate intellectual content of
that article from the Daily Reckoning.
It isn't a particularly persuase argument, but it could only look
mindless to someone who didn't have any kind of clue about the issues
involved..
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:56:06 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
> >On 5 okt, 18:00, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
> ><Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:29:41 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > McSame's
>
> >> Well, one thing the group does know is that you haven't changed. You
> >> are still McRetarded.
>
> >StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt has assessed my intelligence and finds
> >that it doesn't meet his stringent standards, What a pity. He might be
> >using the same kind of crap test that told Eeyore that he had a genius-
> >level IQ, but the odds are that he is just following Jim Thompson's
> >example in claiming that anybody who disagrees with him has to be
> >stupid, where a more objective observer would say "well-informed".
>
> No, you fucking retard!
>
> NOTE exactly what I quoted, you stupid twit!
>
> That has to do with YOUR stupid mindset, and I could give a shit what
> the other guy that also knows that you're a goddamned retard thinks. Dig,
> dipshit?
>
> Saying "McSame" is "well informed"?
And where have I ever said that?
UltimatePondScum can't construct the simplest plausible argument and
yet he is dim enough to think that he can label me retarded.
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
The fact that UltimatePondScum can't follow my arguments and
consequently doesn't find them persuasive is unfortunate, but it isn't
practical to post stuff that is simple enough to be comprehensible to
the seriously intellectually challenged. while keeping the arguments
concise enough to be readable.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:57:34 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
> >I see your comments here and I've read your newspapers - you really
> >don't know much about the world outside your borders.
>
> Do you really think that the dopes that write some of our newspapers
> are representative of "US Residents" thinking or experience in any way,
> shape or form? They are not, and you are stupid to think they are.
Since the primary evidence newspaper provide about your national
knowledge and interest is that they don't write much about the world
ouside the borders of the USA and bury what they do write deep within
the paper (rather than headlining it on the front pages) your
reasoning is - as ever - defective.
European and Australian papers regularly headline foreign news. If a
US newspaper has ever done it, it wasn't when I was there to read it.
Newspaper are good at picking out news items that will interest their
readers - they go bust in short order if they get it wrong - so they
don't have to be representative of "US residents" to give a very clear
picture of the interests of literate America.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
UltimatePatriot
>On 6 okt, 04:30, UltimatePatriot <UltimatePatr...@thebestcountry.org>
>wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:56:06 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
>> >On 5 okt, 18:00, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
>> ><Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:29:41 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> > McSame's
>>
>> >> Well, one thing the group does know is that you haven't changed. You
>> >> are still McRetarded.
>>
>> >StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt has assessed my intelligence and finds
>> >that it doesn't meet his stringent standards, What a pity. He might be
>> >using the same kind of crap test that told Eeyore that he had a genius-
>> >level IQ, but the odds are that he is just following Jim Thompson's
>> >example in claiming that anybody who disagrees with him has to be
>> >stupid, where a more objective observer would say "well-informed".
>>
>> No, you fucking retard!
>>
>> NOTE exactly what I quoted, you stupid twit!
>>
>> That has to do with YOUR stupid mindset, and I could give a shit what
>> the other guy that also knows that you're a goddamned retard thinks. Dig,
>> dipshit?
>>
>> Saying "McSame" is "well informed"?
>
>And where have I ever said that?
The quote was from you, idiot!
quoted:
Jim does seem to make a lot of exceptions, usually - as here - shortly
after
he has posted something exceptionally stupid and been ticked off for it.
And while supporting McSame's candidacy is pretty stupid, that wouldn't
have
registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
end quote.
Yep, it was you, asshole... errr... RETARD!
>UltimatePondScum can't construct the simplest plausible argument and
>yet he is dim enough to think that he can label me retarded.
>
><snip>
You ARE fucking retarded since you cannot even remember what YOU
posted!
Bill Sloman
"UltimatePatriot" <Ultimat...@thebestcountry.org> schreef in bericht
news:g84ke413podunckva...@4ax.com...
> wouldn't have registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
>
> end quote.
So you were objecting to my use of McSame as a play on the name McCain.
It is an economical way of pointing out that McCain isn't significantly
different from George W. Bush Jnr, is used here from time to time by
other posters, and seems to be entirely unexceptionable.
I thought you were claiming that I'd said that McSame was well-informed -
the sentence was ill-formed, but we expect that from you.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
>
> Jim does seem to make a lot of exceptions, usually - as here - shortly after
> he has posted something exceptionally stupid and been ticked off for it.
> And while supporting McSame's candidacy is pretty stupid, that wouldn't have
> registered with Jim who is a very blinkered right-winger.
Yup - he's as much a blinkered right-winger as you are a blinkered
warmingist.
Sometimes, the two of you are virtually indistinguishable. You both are
certainly suffering the same degree of brain-lock (i.e., complete.)
Cheers!
Rich
UltimatePatriot
>- they go bust in short order if they get it wrong - so they
>don't have to be representative of "US residents" to give a very clear
>picture of the interests of literate America.
You're an idiot.
RoyLFuchs
wrote:
>
>So you were objecting to my use of McSame as a play on the name McCain.
>It is an economical way of pointing out that McCain isn't significantly
>different from George W. Bush Jnr, is used here from time to time by
>other posters, and seems to be entirely unexceptionable.
>
>I thought you were claiming that I'd said that McSame was well-informed -
>the sentence was ill-formed, but we expect that from you.
You're a goddamned backstepping idiot, SloTard.
There is no way to "well inform" the idiot that is you.
bill....@ieee.org
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:11:24 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >So you were objecting to my use of McSame as a play on the name McCain.
> >It is an economical way of pointing out that McCain isn't significantly
> >different from George W. Bush Jnr, is used here from time to time by
> >other posters, and seems to be entirely unexceptionable.
>
> >I thought you were claiming that I'd said that McSame was well-informed -
> >the sentence was ill-formed, but we expect that from you.
>
> You're a goddamned backstepping idiot, SloTard.
I'm a "backstepping idiot" because I couldn't believe that even
UltimatePondScum could be silly enough to object to my use of MCSame
in place of MCCain? You haven't mastered elementary logic.
> There is no way to "well inform" the idiot that is you.
This is may be true, in the sense that I know too much and understand
too much to ever agree with the rubbish that you and your dim-witted
colleagues take as gospel.
Unfortunately, your idea of being "well-informed" corresponds to most
people's idea of being brainwashed.
If I were to suffer some kind of serious brain damage, I might be
reduced to a state where I could believe the sort of inconsistent
drivel that seems to satisfy the average right-winger, but at the
moment I still believe that the sun rises in the east and sets in the
west, so it doesn't seem to have happened yet.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
To complete the circle, you and Jim share the same irrational conceit
that belief in anthropogenic global warming is based in an irrational
faith in a non-scientific revelation.
If either of you understood quite a lot more of the relevant science,
you'd have a different opinion, but you are not only ignorant, but
also happy about being ignorant, which is a thoroughly pernicious form
of brain-lock.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Don Bowey
7c3c2d07-01a6-45a1...@v72g2000hsv.googlegroups.com,
"bill....@ieee.org" <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
> On 7 okt, 01:20, RoyLFuchs <RoyLFu...@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:11:24 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> So you were objecting to my use of McSame as a play on the name McCain.
>>> It is an economical way of pointing out that McCain isn't significantly
>>> different from George W. Bush Jnr, is used here from time to time by
>>> other posters, and seems to be entirely unexceptionable.
>>
>>> I thought you were claiming that I'd said that McSame was well-informed -
>>> the sentence was ill-formed, but we expect that from you.
>>
>> You're a goddamned backstepping idiot, SloTard.
>
> I'm a "backstepping idiot" because I couldn't believe that even
> UltimatePondScum could be silly enough to object to my use of MCSame
> in place of MCCain? You haven't mastered elementary logic.
>
>> There is no way to "well inform" the idiot that is you.
>
> This is may be true, in the sense that I know too much and understand
> too much
In your wildest drams maybe. Go re-examine the issue of your egotistical
attitude.
> to ever agree with the rubbish that you and your dim-witted
> colleagues take as gospel.
Having had a look at the type of rag you use to become "informed," I believe
you can't discern what is rubbish.
>
> Unfortunately, your idea of being "well-informed" corresponds to most
> people's idea of being brainwashed.
Some that happens everywhere on the planet. Simple case in point: Bill
Sloman.
>
> If I were to suffer some kind of serious brain damage, I might be
> reduced to a state where I could believe the sort of inconsistent
> drivel that seems to satisfy the average right-winger, but at the
> moment I still believe that the sun rises in the east and sets in the
> west, so it doesn't seem to have happened yet.
There you have it... A fundamental problem in your thought process.
The sun does not rise in the east; the earth sets in the east.
The sun does not set in the west; the earth rises in the west.
Also, the sun neither rises nor sets with reference to Bill Sloman. There
is no connection at all.
By the way, I see Europe has reached a point of economic failure, but can't
get enough of it's little medusa heads to agree on what to do so they just
wiggle in little circles, unlike the US. And don't give us your usual shit
about how it's the US fault. Europe seems to have got tight on European
credit in the same manner as the US. Perhaps some of the billions of US
dollars being held in Europe will help dig your sorry asses out of the mire.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
warm'n'flat
<Zarat...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:49:44 +0100, warm'n'flat
><warm'n'fl...@rabbit.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>Don't worry, the nurse will soon be here with your medication and
>>strait jacket.
>
>
> You're an idiot. Go be a retarded twit somewhere else.
Nurse! I fear we're too late. Now he'll have to go in the padded cell.
:-)
Jim Thompson
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:28:13 +0100, warm'n'flat
<warm'n'fl...@rabbit.com.au> wrote:
>On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:07:14 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
><Zarat...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:49:44 +0100, warm'n'flat
>><warm'n'fl...@rabbit.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Don't worry, the nurse will soon be here with your medication and
>>>strait jacket.
>>
>>
>> You're an idiot. Go be a retarded twit somewhere else.
>Nurse! I fear we're too late. Now he'll have to go in the padded cell.
>:-)
I ran across a photo of Pseudonyms'R'Me in his padded cell...
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Subject: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt -
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt.jpg
Message-ID: <78hpe45unlc1cpuua...@4ax.com>
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine Sometimes I even put it in the food
Michael A. Terrell
Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:28:13 +0100, warm'n'flat
> <warm'n'fl...@rabbit.com.au> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:07:14 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
> ><Zarat...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:49:44 +0100, warm'n'flat
> >><warm'n'fl...@rabbit.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Don't worry, the nurse will soon be here with your medication and
> >>>strait jacket.
> >>
> >>
> >> You're an idiot. Go be a retarded twit somewhere else.
> >Nurse! I fear we're too late. Now he'll have to go in the padded cell.
> >:-)
>
> I ran across a photo of Pseudonyms'R'Me in his padded cell...
That was taken before all his hair fell out.