Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
How about using several photodiodes with each their own amplifiers
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 27 of 27 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jon Elson  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2012, 3:07 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jon Elson <jmel...@wustl.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:07:22 -0500
Local: Thurs, Apr 26 2012 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: How about using several photodiodes with each their own amplifiers

George Herold wrote:

> Well I did a bit better than that ~ 20k photons.  But I think I'm
> finally getting my head around the issues.  I really care about C and
> the voltage noise.

> I measured about 0.2 mVrms of noise but only 1 Meg ohm Rf

Well, one of the interesting things is to test the amp without
the detector, then with the detector with no bias and then with
reverse bias on the detector.  The lowest noise will be with no
detector (detector capacitance increases noise gain, and also there
is thermal noise generated in the junction.)  This is worst
with the detector un-biased, you can watch the noise drop
dramatically with even a few Volts of reverse bias.

Rf really only controls the time it takes to recover to baseline.

Jon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jon Elson  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2012, 3:08 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jon Elson <jmel...@wustl.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:08:50 -0500
Local: Thurs, Apr 26 2012 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: How about using several photodiodes with each their own amplifiers

Bret Cannon wrote:
> I've been told by colleagues who do radioactive detection for a living
> that some modern lantern mantles are doped with cerium rather than thorium
> and
> are not radioactive above background.  They tell of taking a Geiger
> counter into the store to find the "good" mantels for their radioactivity
> is everywhere demonstrations.

Right, I think the Thorium ones are not legal for sale anymore, or
are at least being phased out.

Jon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »