> Les Cargill wrote:

>> No... I get it because She Who Must be Obeyed told me to
>> take the ruddy thing :)

>     How about when the cell site is overloaded, or out of reliable range?

>> I've been using my newish TDS694C to wring out an ultrasensitive preamp
>> board, and it really is a thing of great beauty.  Nice snappy control
>> response, 2 MB of sample memory, 10 Gs/s simultaneously on 4 channels,
>> 125 ps rise times with beautiful Gaussian-looking edges.

> OK, you made me look. The only memory option on the 694C was 1M which is
> 120K points. There was no option 2M for any 6XX scope, and option 1M was
> only offered on the 694C.

>> You must be doing something seriously wrong-- I get $1.92 with just a
>> few clicks (assuming a more-or-less normal letter envelope).

>> http://ircalc.usps.com/MailServices.aspx?country=10063&m=1&p=0&o=2

>>> So I just doubled the usual postage and crossed
>>> my fingers that it's enough.

>> Maybe you tried to put a decimal in the weight field? I don't think I
>> would ever try that.. probably wouldn't work..  just round it up to
>> the next ounce.

>Now that might be a programmer issue.  Silly to not let a user include
>fractions of an ounce.  Expecting a user to know that this value has to
>be rounded and giving an error like, "no product was selected" is total
>crap!