Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
INA168/138 input current
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
n...@rblack01.plus.com  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9, 12:38 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: <n...@rblack01.plus.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:38:05 +0100
Local: Thurs, Jul 9 2009 12:38 pm
Subject: INA168/138 input current
Hi,

I'm planning to use the TI INA138 current-chunt monitor to measure the
load current out of a 6-cell NiMh pack.  The INA138 will be permanently
connected.

I'm keen to keep the standby current from the battery to a minimum when
the product is powered off; the datasheet says the worst-case current
into either of the sense pins is 10uA (which is fine).  What it doesn't
say is whether this still holds with the Vcc pin tied to GND - the 5V
rail powering this pin also powers a bunch of other stuff, which will
have a fairly-low resistance path to GND when it's off.

I've been bitten like this before with protection diodes etc which
aren't shown on the equivalent circuit, anybody have any experience with
this part?  The fall-back plan is to isolate the 138 inputs with a pair
of PMOS's, but it'd be a lot neater if this wasn't necessary.

TIA

R.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Jul 12, 11:43 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:43:12 -0700
Local: Sun, Jul 12 2009 11:43 am
Subject: Re: INA168/138 input current

It's pretty clear that there are no protection diodes...

   "INDEPENDENT SUPPLY AND INPUT COMMONMODE VOLTAGES"

>anybody have any experience with
>this part?  The fall-back plan is to isolate the 138 inputs with a pair
>of PMOS's, but it'd be a lot neater if this wasn't necessary.

>TIA

>R.

About the only way you're going to know is to try it.  I would hazard
a guess that the only sneak-path might be the output (when VDD is
removed)... put an analog switch in series with the emitter (output).

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

 I love to cook with wine     Sometimes I even put it in the food


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google