Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Art of Being Obnoxious

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 2:26:49 PM4/15/01
to
argue argue argue

disagree disagree disagree

trivialize trivialize trivialize

extend extend extend

abstract abstract abstract

condescend condescend condescend

negative negative negative

repeat repeat repeat

Kevin Aylward

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 5:00:55 PM4/15/01
to

"Robert" <rom...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3AD9E7F4...@earthlink.net...

I see your talking about yourself again Robert.

Kevin Aylward , Warden of the Kings Ale
ke...@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk - SuperSpice "Cheap, No Shit!",
GUI xspice, an affordable unlimited component, mixed-mode Windows simulator
with Schematic Capture, waveform display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Opinions of my employer are not necessarily indicative of my own
Oscillators don't, amplifiers do"


Robert

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 5:17:29 PM4/15/01
to

Kevin Aylward wrote:

> "Robert" <rom...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:3AD9E7F4...@earthlink.net...
> > argue argue argue
> >
> > disagree disagree disagree
> >
> > trivialize trivialize trivialize
> >
> > extend extend extend
> >
> > abstract abstract abstract
> >
> > condescend condescend condescend
> >
> > negative negative negative
> >
> > repeat repeat repeat
> >
>
> I see your talking about yourself again Robert.

I see your [sic] talking about yourself again [sic] Robert

I see your [sic] talking about yourself again [sic] Robert

I see your [sic] talking about yourself again [sic] Robert


parrot parrot parrot

Win Hill

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 5:49:43 PM4/15/01
to
Robert wrote:
>
> Kevin Aylward wrote:
>
>> "Robert" <rom...@earthlink.net> wrote
>>>
>>> argue argue argue
>>> disagree disagree disagree
>>> trivialize trivialize trivialize
>>> extend extend extend
>>> abstract abstract abstract
>>> condescend condescend condescend
>>> negative negative negative
>>> repeat repeat repeat
>>
>> I see your talking about yourself again Robert.
>
> I see your [sic] talking about yourself again [sic] Robert
> parrot parrot parrot

"Again" is misspelled?

Actually, I have a relevant story. In 1978 when Paul and
I were seeking a name for our book, the immediate technical
arena had no "Art of xxx" books in to my knowledge. But I
was thinking of two very popular books: The Joy of Cooking
(published in 1975) and The Joy of Sex.

Although The Joy of Electronics seemed appropriate, given
our attitude, somehow it didn't seem quite appropriate or
right for the marketplace. But, The Joy of Electronics
did make me immediately think of The Art of Electronics.
Who knows what other inspiration lurked in the back of my
mind in this idea?

Paul liked it and so did our publisher, it described the
goal of our book, common facts, methods, tricks and obscure
inside knowledge of the practicing engineer, rather than
basic engineering theory. After this insight, the title
The Joy of Electronics no longer seemed appropriate at all.

The relevance of my story?

It seems to me that Robert, John and all the others who
regularly trade barbs here on s.e.d. may well be practicing
The Art of Being Obnoxious, but a better insight to their
practice may be titled, The Joy of Being Obnoxious.

To this we can add, The Joy of Reading Obnoxious.

- Win

Winfield Hill
Rowland Institute for Science
100 Edwin Land Blvd
Cambridge, MA 02142-1297

R. Lewis

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 6:35:31 PM4/15/01
to

Robert <rom...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
<3ADA0FF0...@earthlink.net>...

An atom walked into a bar looking glum and orders a beer.
The barman notices the atoms demeanor and trys to spark up a conversation.
"Things not going too well?" he asked
"No" said the atom
"Nothing to serious I hope"
"Well" says the atom, "I don't know how but I have lost an electron"
"Are you sure"? asks the astonished barman
"I'm positive" came the reply.

Dave Dilatush

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 6:46:50 PM4/15/01
to
Win Hill <wh...@mediaone.net> wrote:

> It seems to me that Robert, John and all the others who
> regularly trade barbs here on s.e.d. may well be practicing

> The Art of Being Obnoxious...

Ah, yes. Tao-Bo, the ancient martial art wherein one vanquishes one's
adversary with revulsion. He who walks away in disgust first, loses.

John Fields

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 7:16:56 PM4/15/01
to

---

These are instructions, right?

---
To email, please add "nospam" to the end of the subject text.

John Fields, Austin Instruments, Inc.
El Presidente Austin, Republic of Texas
"I speak for my company" http://www.austininstruments.com

Ken

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 7:57:13 PM4/15/01
to

John Fields wrote:

> These are instructions, right?

Or a moment of lucid introspection.

--
Ken Tyler

Robert

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 8:11:22 PM4/15/01
to

"R. Lewis" wrote:

>
>
> An atom walked into a bar looking glum and orders a beer.
> The barman notices the atoms demeanor and trys to spark up a conversation.
> "Things not going too well?" he asked
> "No" said the atom
> "Nothing to serious I hope"
> "Well" says the atom, "I don't know how but I have lost an electron"
> "Are you sure"? asks the astonished barman
> "I'm positive" came the reply.

Thank you for bringing back the happy memories of childhood- when I last read
Gamow..:))

Jim_Thompson

unread,
Apr 15, 2001, 8:30:04 PM4/15/01
to
On 15 Apr 2001 22:35:31 GMT, "R. Lewis" <h.l...@connect-2.co.uk>
wrote:

[snip]


|An atom walked into a bar looking glum and orders a beer.
|The barman notices the atoms demeanor and trys to spark up a conversation.
|"Things not going too well?" he asked
|"No" said the atom
|"Nothing to serious I hope"
|"Well" says the atom, "I don't know how but I have lost an electron"
|"Are you sure"? asks the astonished barman
|"I'm positive" came the reply.

ROTFLMAO ;-)

(If replying by E-mail please observe method of anti-spam.)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| Jim-T@analog_innovations.com Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

For proper E-mail replies SWAP "-" and "_".

Rex Allers

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 4:07:13 AM4/16/01
to
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:49:43 GMT, Win Hill <wh...@mediaone.net>
wrote:

>Robert wrote:
>>
>> I see your [sic] talking about yourself again [sic] Robert
>> parrot parrot parrot
>
> "Again" is misspelled?
>

I think he meant it should be "again, Robert". How Robert- can be
critical- about other people's- punctuation- amazes me.

Rex Allers

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 4:41:56 AM4/16/01
to

My favorite part, so far, of the current flying circus conversation
was this:

Robert wrote:
>
>
>"William L. Bahn" wrote:
>>
>> A simple search of bookstore data bases reveals over 30,000 title
>> categorized under "Engineering" (though they are clearly very loose with
>> their definition of "engineering") that have the phrase "The Art of" in
>> the title. Many of them well precede the 1980 first publication date of
>> H&H AoE.
>
>Don't you think I ran the search on Amazon and got 32,000 hits?- Way ahead
>of you.
>

I almost fell out of my chair when I read that.

Robert reminds me more and more of Monty Python. In this part I
think of the knight with his arms cut off itching for more fight,
"Cummon, its just a scratch. Is that the best you can do?", etc.

In fact, if you read some of his rants thinking of a high screeching
voice like the Monty Python spam skits, it seems to go down a lot
better.

Just an aside thought.

-Rex

Keith Wootten

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 5:40:07 AM4/16/01
to
In article <3ADA168B...@mediaone.net>, Win Hill
<wh...@mediaone.net> writes

[snip]

> Actually, I have a relevant story. In 1978 when Paul and
> I were seeking a name for our book, the immediate technical
> arena had no "Art of xxx" books in to my knowledge. But I
> was thinking of two very popular books: The Joy of Cooking
> (published in 1975) and The Joy of Sex.
>
> Although The Joy of Electronics seemed appropriate, given
> our attitude, somehow it didn't seem quite appropriate or
> right for the marketplace. But, The Joy of Electronics
> did make me immediately think of The Art of Electronics.
> Who knows what other inspiration lurked in the back of my
> mind in this idea?

I do, maybe?

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

Robert M. Pirsig 1974 ISBN: 0688002307


Very popular among engineers/hippies.


Cheers
--
Keith Wootten

Matthew van de Werken

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 6:29:07 AM4/16/01
to

"Keith Wootten" <Ke...@wootten.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:okzx7CA3...@wootten.demon.co.uk...

Great book. I have it on my bookshelf (along with a copy of AofE - when's
the third edition out, Win?).

Cheers,
MvdW

Robert

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 9:03:29 AM4/16/01
to

Rex Allers wrote:

How Robert can be critical of other peoples' punctuation amazes me.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

John Fields

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 9:53:56 AM4/16/01
to


---

How Robert can be critical amazes me.

Message has been deleted

Rex Allers

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 2:31:13 PM4/16/01
to
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:24:50 GMT, Robert <rom...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>
>
>Rex Allers wrote:
>
>> How Robert- can be
>> critical- about other people's- punctuation- amazes me.
>

>Rex is it? - and with the totally fake email address and a totally
>forger header. You are scared of something little coward now aren't you.

The email address is just loaded with some extra nospam baggage. The
real one is in there. And the header is in no way forger [sic]. I
made no attempt to hide, other than from stupid spambots.

-Rex

Rex Allers

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 2:43:02 PM4/16/01
to
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:03:29 GMT, Robert <rom...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

Ok, you made me look. From "The Gregg Reference Manual":

Plural Nouns

For an irregular plural noun (one that does not end in s), add an
apostrophe plus s to form the plural possesive.
women's coats children's toys

-Rex

Spehro Pefhany

unread,
Apr 16, 2001, 5:43:51 PM4/16/01
to
The renowned Robert <rom...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> That's because you're taking it at face value- and you're not very bright.

You certainly can put a down spin on things.

Best regards,
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
sp...@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Contributions invited->The AVR-gcc FAQ is at: http://www.BlueCollarLinux.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Philip Pemberton

unread,
Apr 17, 2001, 11:18:07 AM4/17/01
to
"Robert" <rom...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3AD9E7F4...@earthlink.net...
<snip>
Robert, you are the weakest link. Goodbye.
<plonk>

--
Phil.
http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/
phi...@bigfoot.com


James

unread,
Apr 17, 2001, 5:30:59 PM4/17/01
to
Robert thinks You're my alias.
James
[snipped]


0 new messages