Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Radar Microphone?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
markthomas77@Hotmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2003, 6:40 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: MarkThoma...@Hotmail.com (markthoma...@Hotmail.com)
Date: 7 Jan 2003 03:40:35 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 7 2003 6:40 am
Subject: Radar Microphone?
I have one of those cheap Ramsey personal speed radars and was playing
around with it pointing it at a fan and watching the speed display
numbers rapidly change back and forth, when it occurred to me to
connect a pair of headphones to the radars earphone output to see what
I would hear. I could hear the fans blades rotating! I then set the
unit down on a table and started trying to "hear" different objects.

I clanked some keys together, compressed and then rapidly released a
pair of tweezers, etc. I was able to hear the actual audio from these
objects, but the audio quality was absolutely terrible. There was too
much bass in the audio and the audio was terribly distorted.

My question is this: what could I connect to the radars earphone
output that would reduce the exaggerated bass frequencies, and also
clean up the audios tremendous distortion?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Don Pearce  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2003, 7:10 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Don Pearce <don...@pearce.uk.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 12:10:17 +0000
Local: Tues, Jan 7 2003 7:10 am
Subject: Re: Radar Microphone?
On 7 Jan 2003 03:40:35 -0800, MarkThoma...@Hotmail.com

These Doppler RADAR devices give an output signal that is identical
whether the target is coming or going. This means that the output, in
audio terms, is full-wave rectified, and as you say very distorted.
There is no way round this that I can think of. The bass heaviness is
due to the integration effect of a frequency modulated signal going
through a phase detector. A 6dB per octave filter will take care of
this. You will never get good results, though, because the very
considerable phase noise of the oscillator is converted down into the
audio band by the detector.

d

_____________________________
Telecommunications consultant
http://www.pearce.uk.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Larkin  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2003, 1:22 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: John Larkin <jjlar...@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:22:55 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 7 2003 1:22 pm
Subject: Re: Radar Microphone?
On 7 Jan 2003 03:40:35 -0800, MarkThoma...@Hotmail.com

This is a gunn diode transmitter and a diode-mixer receiver. The diode
output is roughly abs(cos(distance)) or something horrible like that,
which is nonlinear as hell except in the occasional small sweet spot
on the sides of the curve. But at the diode itself, the 'frequency
response' (versus displacement) should be flat, at least if the diode
is properly loaded.

Tuning forks are sometimes used to calibrate police radars.

John


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
markthomas77@Hotmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2003, 3:20 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: MarkThoma...@Hotmail.com (markthoma...@Hotmail.com)
Date: 7 Jan 2003 12:20:11 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 7 2003 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: Radar Microphone?
If a gunnplexer had 2 mixer pins, one pin providing the doppler shift
fm i.f. information, and the other pin having a direction sensing
capability by providing the phase difference i.f. from between both
mixer pins, would that make a difference as far as removing or
reducing the distortion to a noticible degree? Could the phase
information from pin 2 be demodulated and amplified in some way so
that it would provide cleaner audio?

It would seem the answer is no. Because the audio from either mixer
pin is still distorted by phase noise from the oscillator that has
been down converted into the audio frequency band. Right? Oh well,
thought I would ask anyway. Thanks.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google