Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

advise on ESR meter project ?

439 views
Skip to first unread message

robb

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:19:08 PM12/21/07
to
after diagnosing an old microcontroler board with lots of various
old caps i thought maybe an ESR meter to be a good tool for the
tool box ? yes/no or a better tool for the box

so i googled for some ESR meter plans and settled on this one
....

http://ludens.cl/Electron/esr/esr.html

could someone comment on this design and whether it appears to be
good/bad ?
are there better plans to build ? are there any improvement mods
that should could be made ?

thanks for any help,
robb


Martin Griffith

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:31:47 PM12/21/07
to

If it's a really old piece of kit , and has electro caps in it, just
replace the lot.
They guys who built it probably didn't know what ESR was in those
days, it's only become obvious with modern smps IC's, needing miniohms
of ESR


martin

AJ

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:32:51 PM12/21/07
to
Bob Parker ESR Meter kits are available ad a reasonable price. Google for
them.
"Martin Griffith" <mart_in_medina@ya___.es> wrote in message
news:jqbom35psbel5fh6d...@4ax.com...

David L. Jones

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:33:18 PM12/21/07
to

Don't bother with that one, get what everyone else in the industry
has:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~bobpar/esrmeter.htm

Bob Parker hangs out on the aus.electronics group, so you can ask
questions there.

There is also this one, which even Bob himself has heard good reports
about:
http://www.peakelec.co.uk/acatalog/jz_esr60.html

Dave.

robb

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:43:07 PM12/21/07
to

"Martin Griffith" <mart_in_medina@ya___.es> wrote in message
news:jqbom35psbel5fh6d...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:19:08 -0500, in sci.electronics.design
"robb"
> <so...@where.on.net> wrote:
> > after diagnosing an old microcontroler board with lots of
various
> > old caps i thought maybe an ESR meter to be a good tool for
the
> > tool box ? yes/no or a better tool for the box
> >
> > so i googled for some ESR meter plans and settled on this one
> >
> > http://ludens.cl/Electron/esr/esr.html
> >
> >could someone comment on this design and whether it appears to
be
> >good/bad ?
> >
> If it's a really old piece of kit , and has electro caps in it,
just
> replace the lot.
> They guys who built it probably didn't know what ESR was in
those
> days, it's only become obvious with modern smps IC's, needing
miniohms
> of ESR
>
hello martin,
thanks for reply.
i understand your point and i will likely do that
however the trouble as pointed out on that ESR schematic website
is that even brand new caps can have numerous ESR failures. So i
was thinking before i invest all that time changing out all those
caps i should at least test the new caps for ESR failures ?

thanks for the advice,
robb


Martin Griffith

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:47:13 PM12/21/07
to

OK, nothing wrong with having an ESR meter, but repairing old bits of
kit, say over 10 years old, just recap the lot, no need for a meter,
and the caps today are a lot better than the 80's.

Are you really going to remove a 20 year old cap, measure it and then
say " that's shit, that one is shit as well, so's that one", then
stuff the occasional good one back into the pcb...., just replace them
all

martin

Martin Griffith

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 4:57:57 PM12/21/07
to
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:43:07 -0500, in sci.electronics.design "robb"
<so...@where.on.net> wrote:

Couldn't cope with the graphics on the web site, but in the old days,
you would just stick 10uF here, 10uF there, and a splattering of a
100nF everywhere, ESR wasn't even in the equation in those days.

And I don't think that a site selling ESR meters would say that
Quality Control in modern factories is quite good.... a bit of FUD
maybe


martin

Chuck Olson

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 6:56:36 PM12/21/07
to

"robb" <so...@where.on.net> wrote in message
news:13moba4...@corp.supernews.com...
I built this one http://www.flippers.com/esrktmtr.html - - really good - -
have enjoyed using it for about 4 months, now. Check out my comment on the
flippers website about 3/4 of the way down the page.

Chuck Olson W6PKP


Jamie

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 6:06:54 PM12/21/07
to
robb wrote:

My opinion, It does not come close to actually giving you a true
ESR reading.
All the design is doing is relying on high valued capacitors assumed
to still have life and hoping to display the effective series resistance
in them by assuming the Xc to be at a very low value with the 50khz
referenced used.
In practice, that isn't a real ESR meter.

When I worked at Semco, the preferred method used on the automation line
for ESR testing was to apply a 1 us pulse to the cap via a low value
R from a stable pulse source.
Both the pulse source and net result reference from the cap under
going a test were being monitored via a high speed comparator.
When the pulse source reached it's max peak it would force another
comparator to briefly update a sample and hold circuit for a generate
voltage offset difference;

Theory of operation was that most caps when discharged (shunt shorted)
would exhibit virtual 0 (Xc)with a fast raise pulse, and the net results
of the resistance formed by construction and leads would then not allow
for an absolute short to common which would give you a reference to work
with that could then be translated into Ohms.
Part of the components were mounted in the probe assembly arm to
reduce induction in the equation.

Using this method, it did not matter if the cap was a small or large
value type. it simply only did the acquisition of readings on a single
positive transition.

This method was check against other equipment in the lab that was
designed for Q testing of small and medium value and found to be very
accurate.


--
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"

"Daily Thought:

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT
THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"

D from BC

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 6:21:40 PM12/21/07
to

The kit is from Vancouver BC
We make some stuff out here.. :)


D from BC

me

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 6:19:46 PM12/21/07
to
"robb" <so...@where.on.net> wrote in
news:13moba4...@corp.supernews.com:

I built and use it. It is adequate for good/bad/questionable diagnosis.
It is also simple to assemble, I built mine from "junk" parts. I don't
think I could beat it for the price...

robb

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 6:44:29 PM12/21/07
to

"Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_v...@charter.net> wrote
in message news:9DXaj.6331$Tt5...@newsfe07.lga...

> robb wrote:
>
> > so i googled for some ESR meter plans and settled on this one
> >
> > http://ludens.cl/Electron/esr/esr.html

> >
> My opinion, It does not come close to actually giving you a
true
> ESR reading.
> All the design is doing is relying on high valued capacitors
assumed
> to still have life and hoping to display the effective series
resistance
> in them by assuming the Xc to be at a very low value with the
50khz
> referenced used.
> In practice, that isn't a real ESR meter.
>

so this luden's ESR gives no useful info about a cap ? and its
a waste of time design ?

Thanks for advice Jamie,
robb


robb

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 6:50:41 PM12/21/07
to

"Chuck Olson" <chucko...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote in
message news:s4udnWu68ORH3vHa...@comcast.com...

Thanks for reply chuck,
That looks alot like those Bob Barker ESR meters

Thanks for help,
robb


Jamie

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 8:09:48 PM12/21/07
to
robb wrote:

from what I can see, it's not fully implemented to give you an
accurate reading. If you were to have a failed cap due to loss
of capacitance, it will give you the conclusion that it has a
high ESR but that isn't true how ever.
A circuit like that could work much better if it was modified.
the idea of pumping in a square wave of 50khz into that xformer
most likely generates +/- pulses if the induction is low enough.

My self, I would of used a bridge type sensing circuit from the
source and from the cap test point with a low (R) between the source
and test cap to measure the offset on the transition period.
With this type of config, the cap would be in as a shunt and not as
a series component.
all one would need to do is cross the leads for 0 calibration before
test begins.

If you don't know enough to mod this unit, maybe you should look for a
simple LCR meter with that function on it.?

I haven't really seen to much on the net for a stand alone ESR meter.
I think most just get a unit that does LCR/ESR.
something like the below link. THat's a bench model how ever, they make
a hand held also.

http://rocky.digikey.com/WebLib/B%20&%20K%20Precision/Web%20Photo/889.jpg

robb

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 8:37:22 PM12/21/07
to

"Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_v...@charter.net> wrote
in message news:IqZaj.75$dY1...@newsfe02.lga...

> robb wrote:
>
> > "Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_v...@charter.net>
wrote
> > in message news:9DXaj.6331$Tt5...@newsfe07.lga...
> >>robb wrote:
> >>>so i googled for some ESR meter plans and settled on this
one
> >>>
> >>> http://ludens.cl/Electron/esr/esr.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> My opinion, It does not come close to actually
> >> giving you a true ESR reading.
> > >
[ trimmed ] ...
> Jamie says .....

> My self, I would of used a bridge type sensing circuit from
the
> source and from the cap test point with a low (R) between the
source
> and test cap to measure the offset on the transition period.
> With this type of config, the cap would be in as a shunt and
not as
> a series component.
> all one would need to do is cross the leads for 0
calibration before
> test begins.
>

Hi jamie speaking of using a bridge circuit how does this design
look ?

http://www.qsl.net/iz7ath/web/02_brew/15_lab/06_esr/

If it is not obvious i am looking for cheap (free) ESR
schematic/plans to build
thanks for the help ,
robb


Jamie

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 9:36:48 PM12/21/07
to
robb wrote:

now you're cooking with GAS! :)

yes, That one will do just fine!

ehsjr

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 11:40:40 PM12/21/07
to

I built that one, the cost is low, and it works fine
for what you want to do. If you want a laboratory
grade instrument, look elsewhere.

Ed

Jan Panteltje

unread,
Dec 22, 2007, 7:07:36 AM12/22/07
to
On a sunny day (Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:44:29 -0500) it happened "robb"
<so...@where.on.net> wrote in <13mojql...@corp.supernews.com>:

I have no ESR meter, but many times if I wanted to know about caps
I just used 2 scope channels, substract, and in that way monitor
the voltage over the cap, and IF it shows fast transients the cap
is defective.
This method works nice in switchmodes.
And indeed the applying a pulse method is likely the best, and can be used
in the same way.
I hope you have an analog scope :-)


Paul Mathews

unread,
Dec 22, 2007, 11:19:07 AM12/22/07
to
On Dec 21, 5:37 pm, "robb" <s...@where.on.net> wrote:
> "Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1l...@charter.net> wrote
> in messagenews:IqZaj.75$dY1...@newsfe02.lga...
>
>
>
>
>
> > robb wrote:
>
> > > "Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1l...@charter.net>
> wrote
> > > in messagenews:9DXaj.6331$Tt5...@newsfe07.lga...
> robb- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

For quick go/nogo indication, those simple ESR meters are handy and
useful. If you happen to have access to some simple equipment, you can
measure ESR and Self Resonant Frequency as follows:
Connect a signal generator output to the capacitor under test. Connect
the trigger output of the generator to scope trigger input. Connect 1
scope channel across cap under test. If a current probe is available,
monitor cap current with it. Otherwise, connect a low value resistor
in series with the ground lead of the cap under test and use a 2nd
scope channel to monitor the voltage across this sense resistor. With
the signal generator set at a low frequency (where Xc is high compared
to the sig gen's output Z), increase sig gen output and scope chan
sensitivities for clean waveforms. Increase frequency and observe
decreasing voltage across cap and increasing current through cap,
along with changing phase relationship. Readjust scope controls as
necessary. Eventually, you will reach a frequency where voltage and
current are in phase, and further increases in frequency cause
decreases in current. The ratio of voltage to current at this
frequency is a good estimate of ESR, and the frequency is near the
SRF. This procedure can be time consuming, but, if you have already
have scope and sig gen, you'll learn a lot about each cap you test.
Paul Mathews

Jean-Yves

unread,
Dec 23, 2007, 5:32:03 AM12/23/07
to
In article <fkiuma$og2$1...@aioe.org>,
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >> robb wrote:
> >>
> >> > so i googled for some ESR meter plans and settled on this one
> >> >
> >> > http://ludens.cl/Electron/esr/esr.html
> >> >
> >> My opinion, It does not come close to actually giving you a
> >true
> >> ESR reading.
> >> All the design is doing is relying on high valued capacitors
> >assumed
> >> to still have life and hoping to display the effective series
> >resistance
> >> in them by assuming the Xc to be at a very low value with the
> >50khz
> >> referenced used.
> >> In practice, that isn't a real ESR meter.
> >>
> >
> >so this luden's ESR gives no useful info about a cap ? and its
> >a waste of time design ?
> >
> >Thanks for advice Jamie,
> >robb

I bought recently this one :

http://www.m3electronix.com/lcr.html
(the french version but it works the same)

nice kit, and with the esr meter you have for the same price of most of
esr meters kits , a precise LCR meter !!!
this is a valuable instrument I really enjoy mine !

regards.

--
Jean-Yves.

Jamie Morken

unread,
Dec 23, 2007, 12:18:00 PM12/23/07
to

Is this for a separate ESR meter, or does the M3 Digital LCRZ meter
also do ESR for capacitors?

cheers,
Jamie


>
> regards.
>

Michael A. Terrell

unread,
Dec 23, 2007, 6:02:14 PM12/23/07
to


It only has a 12.5 KHz maximum test frequecy.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Jean-Yves

unread,
Dec 24, 2007, 5:42:33 AM12/24/07
to
In article <476EE8F6...@earthlink.net>,

it can go to 25khz with the user selectable frequency
yes it's less than the 100khz esr meters often use
but it's enought to measure dead caps !
and far more precise to measure other caps and inductors !
I also have a small analog esr meter I build
(the one from poptronix)
and I never use it anymore...

--
Jean-Yves.

Michael A. Terrell

unread,
Dec 24, 2007, 12:27:42 PM12/24/07
to
Jean-Yves wrote:
>
> it can go to 25khz with the user selectable frequency
> yes it's less than the 100khz esr meters often use
> but it's enought to measure dead caps !
> and far more precise to measure other caps and inductors !
> I also have a small analog esr meter I build
> (the one from poptronix)
> and I never use it anymore...


If the OEM specifies their product at 100 KHZ, then that is the
frequency needed for a proper test.

Daveolla

unread,
Dec 28, 2007, 7:09:49 AM12/28/07
to
On Dec 24, 5:42 am, Jean-Yves <no_pub_for_jypoc...@free.fr> wrote:
> In article <476EE8F6.D9D86...@earthlink.net>,

>  "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jean-Yves wrote:
>
> > > In article <fkiuma$og...@aioe.org>,
> Jean-Yves.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Greetings, what is wrong with the Poptronix version..........details
anyone (I've had one as an ongoing project for awhile, I had the
bright idea a couple of years ago to put it in a probe style case with
small meter)? It also has a led for DC shorts.
Dave

Jean-Yves

unread,
Dec 28, 2007, 9:03:11 AM12/28/07
to
In article
<4493e4a6-79f8-4f7b...@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Daveolla <grob...@netflash.net> wrote:

> > it can go to 25khz with the user selectable frequency
> > yes it's less than the 100khz esr meters often use
> > but it's enought to measure dead caps !
> > and far more precise to measure other caps and inductors !
> > I also have a small analog esr meter I build
> > (the one from poptronix)
> > and I never use it anymore...
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Yves.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Greetings, what is wrong with the Poptronix version..........details
> anyone (I've had one as an ongoing project for awhile, I had the
> bright idea a couple of years ago to put it in a probe style case with
> small meter)? It also has a led for DC shorts.
> Dave

there is nothing wrong with the poptronix version except that I have now
a far better esr (in fact rlc) meter since...
I still have the poptronic and it still works fine but I only have 10
leds to tell me the esr and now I have a 10000 count rlc meter...

the poptronic still has the frequency of 100khz for the test and I can
only go to 25khz with the rlc meter.

--
Jean-Yves.

0 new messages