On 04/29/2013 01:22 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:45:38 +0000 (UTC), David Lesher
> <
wb8...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm seeking those clips that hold TO-92 cases. They look sorta
>> like the number 9, with the TO-92 going in the donut hole, and
>> the tail having a hole for a mounting screw. They hold the
>> device parallel to the mounting surface.
>
> I found a few attached to transistors, but nothing sold individually.
> Try your luck and see if you can do better:
> <
https://www.google.com/search?q=TO92+heatsink&tbm=isch>
>
>> But I am having no luck finding the right term to describe such
>> to Mr. Digikey or Ms Mouser.....Suggestions?
>
> Ummm... TO92 heat sink?
>
>> I'm open to alternatives; our task is to fasten a temp sensor
>> to a 0.25" OD copper line to sense the fluid temp. within...
>> I planned to solder the clips to the line...
>
> If that's part of a temperature control system, it's not going to work
> very well. The problem is that you're measuring the temperature of a
> big copper tubular heat sink. It will take a while for the fluid to
> heat or cool the copper tubing resulting in a rather slow response
> time. If there's any air flow over this thing, it will cool the temp
> sensor and copper, resulting in what might be a substantial
> temperature error. Basically, you want to measure the temperature of
> the fluid and not the temperature of the tubing or the environment.
What's worse, TO-92 packages are excellent insulators--all that sensor
will do is measure the temperature of its leads. TO220 would be a much
better idea.
Thermal diffusion in organic materials is amazingly slow--like 5000
times slower than in aluminum or copper. A half-mil layer of Kapton
tape is slower than an inch of aluminum.
A small copper tube's temperature won't be a bad proxy for the
temperature of the fluid _in_the_tube_, not necessarily in some
reservoir. Certainly the error will be smaller than the die temperature
to tube temperature error, if you use a TO-92.
>
> I suggest you drill a small hole in the copper tubing, shove in a
> small glass thermistor probe that contacts the fluid and *NOT* the
> copper tubing, and seal with epoxy glue.
> <
https://www.google.com/search?q=glass+thermistor+bead&tbm=isch>
> You'll have much faster response, better accuracy, and less time
> wasted trying to find strange heat sinks.
>
My vote would be for a PT1000 RTD attached to the tube with Arctic
Silver epoxy or something equivalent, or else a TO220 transistor.
It would be interesting to think about using the gate-cathode junction
of a TO220 sensitive-gate SCR instead of a transistor. Since the tab is
normally the anode, you'd have junction isolation between the tubing and
the signal ground, which should help a lot with ground loops without
requiring a slow and/or messy thermal junction.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net