Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion BJT Amplifier Output Votlage Swing

Received: by 10.224.117.143 with SMTP id r15mr1789936qaq.1.1349207656951;
        Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.34.205 with SMTP id b13mr1374572vdj.3.1349207656811; Tue,
 02 Oct 2012 12:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e10ni166099737qan.0!nntp.google.com!l8no21672331qao.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <iq4m68tvqmp2cqdbkghomqtkfruhqc59k1@4ax.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=139.169.119.220;
 posting-account=wxvGDwoAAACG9vxwYng57lvnZVq8ZKY7
NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.169.119.220
References: <9136b0f2-cdfa-42ee-a9ad-23f5cd995b78@googlegroups.com> <iq4m68tvqmp2cqdbkghomqtkfruhqc59k1@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ace26506-f406-48a6-b4d6-df253b895c67@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: BJT Amplifier Output Votlage Swing
From: panfilero <panfil...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:54:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 11:19:15 AM UTC-5, k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >I'm having a hard time understanding the "negative swing" of a common-emitter amplifier.  There is a website called thesignalpath.com where a BJT amplifier is described.
> 
> >
> 
> >The set up is a BJT with a collector resistor, an emitter resistor, 2.5V and -2.5V supplies, and we're taking the output off the collector.  The BJT has a Vce,sat = 0.2V  According to the website
> 
> >
> 
> >maximum Vout = Vdd
> 
> >positive swing = VRc
> 
> >minimum Vout = -2.3V + VRc
> 
> >negative swing = Vce - 0.2V
> 
> >
> 
> >I understand the first three things, but the last one, negative voltage swing has me confused... why is the negative voltage swing defined as Vce - Vce,sat?
> 
> >
> 
> >here's a link to the source
> 
> >
> 
> >http://thesignalpath.com/blogs/2012/09/23/tutorial-on-the-theory-design-and-characterization-of-a-single-transistor-bipolar-amplifier/#comments
> 
> 
> 
> What they're trying to say is that the negative swing is |VCC- - VCEsat|, or
> 
> the magnitude of the negative swing is the negative supply minus the
> 
> saturation voltage.

so you think it's just a typo? That he really meant Vcc - Vce,sat and not Vce - Vce,sat?