Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
help understanding the monster I created :-)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tom Horsley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2005, 7:55 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Tom Horsley" <Tom.Hors...@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:55:24 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jan 20 2005 7:55 am
Subject: help understanding the monster I created :-)
I've been working on a silly gadget using the cut & paste bits
of other circuits technique combined with a large does of
ignorance :-).

The gadget details can be found here:

http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley/phonetale/markII.html

With my breadboarded circuit, I have been observing a
phenomena that my tiny little brain can't figure out.

When I expose the cadmium sulphide photoresistor to light,
my relay triggers once (briefly) as expected and desired.

However, fairly often (not all the time), when I put the
lens cap back over the resistor and block off the light,
the circuit will trigger the relay again.

The only theory I have (with no access to a scope that
can record whats happening at different points and show
me) is that the photoresistor resistance actually bounces
around some as it gets dark rather than simply smoothly
going back up. Could that be it? Or has the ignorance part
of my design process merely led me to do something
silly along the way?

Any ideas for improvements to my design or explainations
of this puzzling behavior gratefully accepted. (I doubt
it is gravity waves though :-).

(Perhaps chuck the whole thing and detect incoming calls
via the headset interface is a better plan - but I'd have
to find out about interfacing to cell phone headsets
for that to work...).


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Holme  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2005, 8:52 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Andrew Holme" <ajho...@hotmail.com>
Date: 20 Jan 2005 05:52:56 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 20 2005 8:52 am
Subject: Re: help understanding the monster I created :-)

Yes, that's correct.  The LM339 is very sensitive: it responds to very
small differences between the inputs.  As the photocell resistance
passes through the critical threshold, the slightest "bounce" is enough
to momentarily push it back below the threshold.  To overcome this, you
should add a little hysteresis by connecting a very large resistor (at
least 100k, maybe even 1M) between the output and the non-inverting (+)
input.  The on-off and off-on transitions will then occur at slightly
different points e.g. like a thermostat.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jamie  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2005, 3:57 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Jamie <jamie_5_not_valid_after_5_Ple...@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:57:06 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 20 2005 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: help understanding the monster I created :-)

i just looked at the circuit you have there. from what i can
see, puting a small cap from the output of the OP-amp to the
- input could increase the response time thus absorbing the
  quick pulses you may be getting.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas A. Horsley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2005, 7:20 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: tom.hors...@att.net (Thomas A. Horsley)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:20:00 GMT
Subject: Re: help understanding the monster I created :-)

>To overcome this, you should add a little hysteresis by connecting a very
>large resistor (at least 100k, maybe even 1M) between the output and the
>non-inverting (+) input.

Thanks! That did indeed do the trick. In another Doh! moment, I notice that
the web page I point to with info on comparators even describes the reasons
I'd want to add hysteresis, but I never made the connection :-).

the comparator page I mention is at:

   http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/Comparators.html
--

>>==>> The *Best* political site <URL:http://www.vote-smart.org/> >>==+

      email: Tom.Hors...@worldnet.att.net icbm: Delray Beach, FL      |
<URL:http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley> Free Software and Politics <<==+

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »