Alarmists from Woods Hole to the VIMS to Sebastian to the Keys to
Tampa Bay to Galveston to Cortes Bank to Scripps can out fish any
denier-fishermen who think they know something about fishing.

Any takers?

Bret Cahill

Apparently not.

Deniers are all talk and no striper.

No giant sea bass.

And no reds.

Bret Cahill

Too lazy to fish yet they want to be taken seriously when it comes to
climate change.

On Sep 25, 12:35 am, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You've lost it buddy. Time to get different meds.

On 9/25/2012 11:40 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:

LOOK HERE
http://www.cyberangler.com/fishing-reports/florida/sarasota/

Here is what I said:
" I look at the bait fish and see a lot of water (variables) between the
bait and the BIG fish I really want to actually catch."

HERE is what the real fishermen say, that took fish on their boat.

["The strategy this week has been to get out there EARLY, find grass in
6'-8' with clean water and toss jigs and live bait. *Rising water*
*temperatures* seem to have the fish a tad deeper this week. The water
near the passes is still a bit murky, but is clearing up daily. Species
list for this week's charters include speckled trout, redfish, jack
crevelle, bluefish, flounder, mangrove snapper, black sea bass, and
ladyfish."]

The point here is that the "correlation" of bait in the water meaning
that you can catch fish to eat in the midst of the bait, is as false as
the mythology that CO2 will heat up the planet.

Correlation is misleading, sometimes things are actually related, but
NOT always.  Hence the water getting warm means that your fish analogy
is NOT true at all times.

Your fishing analogy makes my point NOT yours.

Try a different one maybe it will work better.

Sportsmen are the canary in the mine shaft when it comes to AGW.

Bret Cahill