Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Buffer overruns
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
D. J. Bernstein  
View profile  
 More options Jan 15 2005, 7:38 pm
Newsgroups: sci.crypt, comp.security.unix
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <d...@cr.yp.to>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:38:02 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Jan 15 2005 7:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
I often see people saying ``Nobody has produced an invulnerable software
system; therefore, nobody will ever produce an invulnerable software
system.''

By the same bogus reasoning, nobody will ever reach Mars; nobody will
ever find MD5 collisions; nobody will ever cure cancer; nobody will ever
prove the Poincare conjecture; nobody will ever clone a human; nobody
will ever build a 1GHz CPU; nobody will ever find SHA-1 collisions;
nobody will ever break the sound barrier; etc.

David Wagner wrote:
> The goal is to reduce the risk of security flaws; eliminating the
> risk is probably infeasible.

Do you have any justification for the latter statement?

---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.