<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt</id>
  <title type="text">sci.crypt Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Different methods of data en/decryption.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.crypt/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.crypt feed"/>
  <updated>2008-10-16T03:10:37Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antony Clements</name>
  <email>antony.cleme...@bigpond.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-16T03:10:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/ff27de31688ccc5f/c6ea94b5b35425f2?show_docid=c6ea94b5b35425f2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/ff27de31688ccc5f/c6ea94b5b35425f2?show_docid=c6ea94b5b35425f2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: DES sbox correlation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  hence it only being a concept. at first glance it appears all well and good, &lt;br&gt; indepth it might be worth the while, or it might be complete crap. it is &lt;br&gt; afterall, not much different at all from a fully invertible single sbox.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antony Clements</name>
  <email>antony.cleme...@bigpond.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-16T03:06:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/30a0b9d068e7d26e/ba34e4e3dfb6466f?show_docid=ba34e4e3dfb6466f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/30a0b9d068e7d26e/ba34e4e3dfb6466f?show_docid=ba34e4e3dfb6466f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Changing the name of My OTP.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Incorrect, there is either a fan or electrical or heat oscillation within &lt;br&gt; the box which many people use as a source of randomness. If there is no &lt;br&gt; random source then it is not a random stream, merely a pseudo-random stream &lt;br&gt; based on some criteria. A random stream has no criteria to generate a key. &lt;br&gt; What do you mean by severed?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antony Clements</name>
  <email>antony.cleme...@bigpond.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-16T02:48:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/1930347fd3eb8477?show_docid=1930347fd3eb8477</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/1930347fd3eb8477?show_docid=1930347fd3eb8477"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Any benefit to file obfuscation?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Forgive me if I am mistaken here, but I am pretty sure that I read somewhere &lt;br&gt; that truecrypt is actually quite insecure.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antony Clements</name>
  <email>antony.cleme...@bigpond.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-16T02:46:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/05b6473395b3731b?show_docid=05b6473395b3731b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/05b6473395b3731b?show_docid=05b6473395b3731b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Any benefit to file obfuscation?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Just because you can&#39;t determine where the keying is coming from, it does &lt;br&gt; not mean it is not there. Block1 XOR block2 XOR block3, from my limited &lt;br&gt; understanding, not only ensures that the entire message is there, but with a &lt;br&gt; simple checking function, will also determine if the message is authentic.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antony Clements</name>
  <email>antony.cleme...@bigpond.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-16T02:22:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/8812335bfce5d5a6?show_docid=8812335bfce5d5a6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/8812335bfce5d5a6?show_docid=8812335bfce5d5a6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Any benefit to file obfuscation?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;snip a bunch of stuff&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; I think the point Mr Ashwood is making, and I back him up on this. If the &lt;br&gt; start point is always the same AND you are storing the RNG values somewhere &lt;br&gt; (which, to put it bluntly, must be done for the obfuscation to be reversed &lt;br&gt; if you are using random values.) Then the obfuscation values would need to
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>spa...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-16T00:19:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/83d5edddc3cc3e8b/839ecd237724c85e?show_docid=839ecd237724c85e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/83d5edddc3cc3e8b/839ecd237724c85e?show_docid=839ecd237724c85e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Another LibTomMath Bug - Exptmod_fast&#39;s use of mp_dr_reduce</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Oct 15, 4:34 pm, Phil Carmody &amp;lt;thefatphil_demun...@yahoo.co. uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; When x = 1, the attributes of x in the mp_int struct are as follows: &lt;br&gt; Number of digits: &lt;br&gt; x-&amp;gt;used = 1 &lt;br&gt; x-&amp;gt;alloc = number of allocated digits.... which is more than 1, &lt;br&gt; probably 32 or so &lt;br&gt; Digit values: &lt;br&gt; x-&amp;gt;dp[0] = 1 &lt;br&gt; x-&amp;gt;dp[1] = uninitialized
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Carsten Krueger</name>
  <email>cakru...@invalid.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T23:59:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/257dcb4bdbee8e54?show_docid=257dcb4bdbee8e54</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/257dcb4bdbee8e54?show_docid=257dcb4bdbee8e54"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Any benefit to file obfuscation?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 11 Oct 2008 18:12:12 GMT schrieb Orlan: &lt;br&gt; Use truecrypt.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>spa...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T23:57:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/f603decaed69fbd2/eaeecd45379e7089?show_docid=eaeecd45379e7089</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/f603decaed69fbd2/eaeecd45379e7089?show_docid=eaeecd45379e7089"/>
  <title type="text">Re: LibTomMath Bug - Exptmod_fast&#39;s use of mp_dr_reduce</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Double post, sorry.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phil Carmody</name>
  <email>thefatphil_demun...@yahoo.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T23:34:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/83d5edddc3cc3e8b/adf092b426966aa2?show_docid=adf092b426966aa2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/83d5edddc3cc3e8b/adf092b426966aa2?show_docid=adf092b426966aa2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Another LibTomMath Bug - Exptmod_fast&#39;s use of mp_dr_reduce</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  How are you defining &amp;quot;an uninitialised digit of x&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt; Phil
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>spa...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T22:45:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/f603decaed69fbd2/05850658531528ac?show_docid=05850658531528ac</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/f603decaed69fbd2/05850658531528ac?show_docid=05850658531528ac"/>
  <title type="text">LibTomMath Bug - Exptmod_fast&#39;s use of mp_dr_reduce</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I believe that I have found another bug, which happens when &lt;br&gt; expmod_fast is called with redmode = 1. The values that I am using &lt;br&gt; are: &lt;br&gt; (in hex) &lt;br&gt; x = 1 &lt;br&gt; b = 4 &lt;br&gt; c = CFFFFFFF &lt;br&gt; redmode = 1 &lt;br&gt; and my DIGIT_BIT is 28 &lt;br&gt; The problem that this causes is that mp_dr_reduce is called with an x &lt;br&gt; = 1, and an n = CFFFFFFF. When dr_reduce is called with an x that has
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>spa...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T22:33:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/83d5edddc3cc3e8b/e322b90127ab8328?show_docid=e322b90127ab8328</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/83d5edddc3cc3e8b/e322b90127ab8328?show_docid=e322b90127ab8328"/>
  <title type="text">Another LibTomMath Bug - Exptmod_fast&#39;s use of mp_dr_reduce</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I believe that I have found another bug, which happens when &lt;br&gt; expmod_fast is called with redmode = 1. The values that I am using &lt;br&gt; are: &lt;br&gt; (in hex) &lt;br&gt; x = 1 &lt;br&gt; b = 4 &lt;br&gt; c = CFFFFFFF &lt;br&gt; redmode = 1 &lt;br&gt; and my DIGIT_BIT is 28 &lt;br&gt; The problem that this causes is that mp_dr_reduce is called with an x &lt;br&gt; = 1, and an n = CFFFFFFF. When dr_reduce is called with an x that has
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>WTShaw</name>
  <email>lure...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T18:41:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/30a0b9d068e7d26e/bd91ff3beb4de3a0?show_docid=bd91ff3beb4de3a0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/30a0b9d068e7d26e/bd91ff3beb4de3a0?show_docid=bd91ff3beb4de3a0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Changing the name of My OTP.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Oct 12, 9:38 pm, &amp;quot;Antony Clements&amp;quot; &amp;lt;antony.cleme...@bigpond.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Actually, no. True is hard to catch but largely defined by your &lt;br&gt; choice of method. But, you might derive more random streams from less &lt;br&gt; random streams by any number of processes. This goes to my other &lt;br&gt; recent objection that being that making your keys was and had to be
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Eather</name>
  <email>eat...@tpg.com.au</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T18:25:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/ff27de31688ccc5f/7006ea4546d0941d?show_docid=7006ea4546d0941d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/ff27de31688ccc5f/7006ea4546d0941d?show_docid=7006ea4546d0941d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: DES sbox correlation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You need to think this through. A mature / considered design has few &lt;br&gt; features that do not improve security and no features that appear to add &lt;br&gt; complexity but in reality don&#39;t add security.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>tavares@fe.up.pt</name>
  <email>tava...@fe.up.pt</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T17:51:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/d9447f326815641c/bea2ccd0601ca83a?show_docid=bea2ccd0601ca83a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/d9447f326815641c/bea2ccd0601ca83a?show_docid=bea2ccd0601ca83a"/>
  <title type="text">VipIMAGE 2009 – ECCOMAS Thematic Conference - FIRST ANNOUNCE</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------- &lt;br&gt; (Apologies for cross-posting) &lt;br&gt; International ECCOMAS Thematic Conference VipIMAGE 2009 - II ECCOMAS &lt;br&gt; THEMATIC &lt;br&gt; CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL VISION AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kristian Gjøsteen</name>
  <email>kristiag+n...@math.ntnu.no</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-15T17:45:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/4e917524acb2a23b?show_docid=4e917524acb2a23b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_thread/thread/a4abc12b907e4f66/4e917524acb2a23b?show_docid=4e917524acb2a23b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Any benefit to file obfuscation?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  So there&#39;s no point to obfuscation. We knew that. Why bother saying it &lt;br&gt; five times? &lt;br&gt; Postings to sci.crypt count negatively in the Cryptography Grand Prix, &lt;br&gt; because encouraging trolls like this is constitutes attempted denial of &lt;br&gt; service on intelligent discourse.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
