Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Time for a Fresh Start - amendment.
43 views
Skip to first unread message
austin...@hotmail.com
May 19, 2012, 8:41:37 PM5/19/12
to
(I can’t see what difference this is going to make but if it keeps someone happy why not ….. there are a few small corrections that needed seeing to anyway)
It is time to bite the bullet and admit that scalar cryptography is a syntactic error that cannot go on in the future. The sheer transparency of this data type is simply impossible to hide and all we are doing now is trying desperately with ever more ingenious algorithms to conceal encryption transformations that won’t be concealed. This is nothing more than complexity-theoretic cryptology that is not going anywhere.
The increasing power of computers is not helping matters either and even the much-lauded property of “randomness” in scalar data is not useful anymore. Today’s powerful computers can brute-force the possibility space of multiple candidate messagetexts (the claim for randomness) to an alarming degree of accuracy when they are purportedly secured by randomness and the ‘uncertainty’ that it is supposed to cause to cryptanalysts.
Displacement cryptography is immune to increasing computer power for all time.
A downside of course to vector cryptography is the large ciphertext expansion ratio which is 23 to 1 (in the ciphers to hand) compared with about 10 to 1 and less in scalar cryptography ciphers.
The ever increasing power of computers makes light of this disadvantage however as indeed does the imminent use of Unicode languages in the future.
The writing is on the wall – its time to change.
This change is being initiated right here in sci script - get behind it.
- adacrypt
It is time to bite the bullet and admit that scalar cryptography is a syntactic error that cannot go on in the future. The sheer transparency of this data type is simply impossible to hide and all we are doing now is trying desperately with ever more ingenious algorithms to conceal encryption transformations that won’t be concealed. This is nothing more than complexity-theoretic cryptology that is not going anywhere.
The increasing power of computers is not helping matters either and even the much-lauded property of “randomness” in scalar data is not useful anymore. Today’s powerful computers can brute-force the possibility space of multiple candidate messagetexts (the claim for randomness) to an alarming degree of accuracy when they are purportedly secured by randomness and the ‘uncertainty’ that it is supposed to cause to cryptanalysts.
Displacement cryptography is immune to increasing computer power for all time.
A downside of course to vector cryptography is the large ciphertext expansion ratio which is 23 to 1 (in the ciphers to hand) compared with about 10 to 1 and less in scalar cryptography ciphers.
The ever increasing power of computers makes light of this disadvantage however as indeed does the imminent use of Unicode languages in the future.
The writing is on the wall – its time to change.
This change is being initiated right here in sci script - get behind it.
- adacrypt
WoolyBully
May 20, 2012, 9:11:17 AM5/20/12
to
On Sat, 19 May 2012 17:41:37 -0700 (PDT), austin...@hotmail.com
wrote:
>(I can’t see what difference
CARRIAGE RETURN, IDIOT!
Learn how to FORMAT as TEXT and LIMIT line length.
How can you claim to be intelligent about crypto, if you cannot even
learn something so simple as that?
wrote:
>(I can’t see what difference
Learn how to FORMAT as TEXT and LIMIT line length.
How can you claim to be intelligent about crypto, if you cannot even
learn something so simple as that?
Greg Rose
May 20, 2012, 11:16:45 AM5/20/12
to
In article <49rhr7953f9per53l...@4ax.com>,
This guy thrives on getting any replies at all.
Please just ignore him. He's not educable.
Greg.
--
Please just ignore him. He's not educable.
Greg.
--
bert
May 20, 2012, 2:17:56 PM5/20/12
to
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:16:45 PM UTC+1, Greg Rose wrote:
> This guy thrives on getting any replies at all.
> Please just ignore him. He's not educable.
I'm not sure about "thrives". Mostly
> This guy thrives on getting any replies at all.
> Please just ignore him. He's not educable.
he seems to just ignore replies! It's
far from clear why he posts at all.
--
David Eather
May 20, 2012, 5:13:56 PM5/20/12
to
On Mon, 21 May 2012 04:17:56 +1000, bert <bert.hu...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
I think it is (sadly) to drown out the empty sound in his head.
--
We have failed to address the fundamental truth that endless growth is
impossible in a finite world.
wrote:
--
We have failed to address the fundamental truth that endless growth is
impossible in a finite world.
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
May 21, 2012, 9:26:36 AM5/21/12
to
On Mon, 21 May 2012 07:13:56 +1000, "David Eather" <eat...@tpg.com.au>
wrote:
>On Mon, 21 May 2012 04:17:56 +1000, bert <bert.hu...@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:16:45 PM UTC+1, Greg Rose wrote:
>>> This guy thrives on getting any replies at all.
>>> Please just ignore him. He's not educable.
>>
>> I'm not sure about "thrives". Mostly
>> he seems to just ignore replies! It's
>> far from clear why he posts at all.
>
>I think it is (sadly) to drown out the empty sound in his head.
Unimpeded echoes tend to bounce around a few times before attenuating.
wrote:
>On Mon, 21 May 2012 04:17:56 +1000, bert <bert.hu...@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:16:45 PM UTC+1, Greg Rose wrote:
>>> This guy thrives on getting any replies at all.
>>> Please just ignore him. He's not educable.
>>
>> I'm not sure about "thrives". Mostly
>> he seems to just ignore replies! It's
>> far from clear why he posts at all.
>
>I think it is (sadly) to drown out the empty sound in his head.
0 new messages