Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Time for a Fresh Start.
33 views
Skip to first unread message
austin...@hotmail.com
May 19, 2012, 5:52:26 AM5/19/12
to
It is time to bite the bullet and admit that scalar cryptography is a syntactic error that cannot go on in the future. The sheer transparency of this data type is simply impossible to hide and all we are doing now is trying desperately with ever more ingenious algorithms to conceal encryption transformations that won’t be concealed in what is nothing more than complexity-theoretic cryptology.
The increasing power of computers is not helping matters either and even the much-lauded property of “randomness” in scalar data is not useful anymore. Today’s powerful computers can brute force the possibility space of multiple candidate messagetexts (implied by randomness)to an alarming degree of accuracy when they are purportedly secured by randomness and the ‘uncertainty’ that is supposed to cause to cryptanalysts.
Displacement cryptography is immune to increasing computer power for all time.
A downside of course to vector cryptography is the large ciphertext expansion ratio which is 23 to 1 (in the ciphers to hand) compared with about 10 to 1 and less in scalar cryptography ciphers.
The ever increasing power of computers makes light of this disadvantage however as indeed does the imminent use of Unicode languages in the future.
The writing is on the wall – its time to change.
This change is proudly being initiated here is sci crypt.
- adacrypt
The increasing power of computers is not helping matters either and even the much-lauded property of “randomness” in scalar data is not useful anymore. Today’s powerful computers can brute force the possibility space of multiple candidate messagetexts (implied by randomness)to an alarming degree of accuracy when they are purportedly secured by randomness and the ‘uncertainty’ that is supposed to cause to cryptanalysts.
Displacement cryptography is immune to increasing computer power for all time.
A downside of course to vector cryptography is the large ciphertext expansion ratio which is 23 to 1 (in the ciphers to hand) compared with about 10 to 1 and less in scalar cryptography ciphers.
The ever increasing power of computers makes light of this disadvantage however as indeed does the imminent use of Unicode languages in the future.
The writing is on the wall – its time to change.
This change is proudly being initiated here is sci crypt.
- adacrypt
WoolyBully
May 19, 2012, 12:32:24 PM5/19/12
to
On Sat, 19 May 2012 02:52:26 -0700 (PDT), austin...@hotmail.com
wrote:
>It is time to bite the bullet and admit that...
You do not know the first thing about making proper, considerate posts
into Usenet?
Line length limit is 72 characters, dork. Usenet was here BEFORE your
web based access to this group was, and the stupid 'chat engine' they set
up to give you access to it. Friggin google retards, You AND THEM.
Try conforming to a few of those protocols and expectations, then, once
your CRAPTO is properly formatted, folks may actually consider it
readable remarks about CRYPTO.
Conform FIRST, THEN get back onto your little currently displaced hobby
horse. Or at least it should be. Bone up on Usenet. Otherwise, you are
no more than a mere interloper.
wrote:
>It is time to bite the bullet and admit that...
You do not know the first thing about making proper, considerate posts
into Usenet?
Line length limit is 72 characters, dork. Usenet was here BEFORE your
web based access to this group was, and the stupid 'chat engine' they set
up to give you access to it. Friggin google retards, You AND THEM.
Try conforming to a few of those protocols and expectations, then, once
your CRAPTO is properly formatted, folks may actually consider it
readable remarks about CRYPTO.
Conform FIRST, THEN get back onto your little currently displaced hobby
horse. Or at least it should be. Bone up on Usenet. Otherwise, you are
no more than a mere interloper.
0 new messages