Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru
I have no idea about this specific case, but the usual reason for a
cryptosystem to provide an encryption-only mode is that authentication
might already be provided by another protocol layer. In that case,
assuming the existing authentication is properly done, redundant
authentication would only waste cycles while achieving nothing useful.
--
Ilmari Karonen
To reply by e-mail, please replace ".invalid" with ".net" in address.
Generalized authentication is extremely expensive. Any opportunity to
avoid it without compromising the system should be taken.
> I have no idea about this specific case, but the usual reason for a
> cryptosystem to provide an encryption-only mode is that authentication
> might already be provided by another protocol layer. In that case,
> assuming the existing authentication is properly done, redundant
> authentication would only waste cycles while achieving nothing useful.
Such as while having a secure conversation with your wife (or husband)
over UDP.
-Le Chaud Lapin-
When ESP was first designed, it was anticipated that it would often be used
in conjunction with AH which would provide the authentication. This has
turned out not to be the case (use of AH is quite rare), but the provisions
for that are still present.
--
poncho