Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jdm  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2011, 10:23 pm
Newsgroups: sci.crypt.research
From: jdm <james.d.mclaugh...@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Nov 2011 03:23:01 GMT
Local: Wed, Nov 16 2011 10:23 pm
Subject: -

(I have also tried emailing the authors. Well, I emailed one of them,
who didn't reply, and although I've emailed the others I'm a bit wary
of waiting too long for a reply, so...)

If anyone else on here has read "Multidimensional Extension of
Matsui's Algorithm 2", I'm having serious trouble with part of it.

Equation (18) is obtained by solving Equation (9) (using the by-then
obtained means and variances for distributions a and R). However, I've
plugged the values for mean and variance into Equation 9, and:

* There seems to be no way to rearrange it to obtain an equation in
terms of N.

* There seems to be no way to obtain a formula containing the term
Phi^{-1}(2*P_S - 1) from it. I can see how, at the start of the
rearrangement, the term Phi^{-1}(P_S) appears on one side, but as Phi
is not affine, this is as far as I can go.

* The wording appears to indicate that the variance sigma_a^2 is
negligible and should be approximated by zero. If anyone's managed to
obtain the equation for N independently, can they confirm or deny
this?

Many thanks,

James McLaughlin.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »