Received: by 10.66.86.194 with SMTP id r2mr2443319paz.42.1352366546920;
Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:22:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Timothy Sutter <a202...@lycos.com->
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Tim, does Google have a "locking mechanism" Re: your slip is showing...
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:32:39 -0500
Organization: Absolute Zero
Lines: 402
Message-ID: <50991177.7AD5@lycos.com->
References: <50989C87.2460@lycos.com-> <2955148d-634a-44ce-aaa8-094e9954bb10@c16g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <50990978.4783@lycos.com-> <50990E70.2A0@lycos.com-> <50990F7F.42DE@lycos.com->
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.albasani.net +8+LuJ+GQwPTgEChLpMXkTuo0YOUw3YiquJyAybD8hJIzpy8PzRiYyTgZvEAFRenfHaKAvahWXM7cKyjNzUQ/Q==
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:37:16 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="r1NTiiBBj+dV5Hi68WUg48vy2GCdbcPfRr1ohxZZb4i84SvyWXg7x9xVYNl/OIz8/QlKmKJz39NtlIZpvmRGa2ekdhO4/E1PROGmL3uLG2djzIJNp0pPfWPS/wvgHFMG"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@albasani.net"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03 (WinNT; I)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HuyVL0hmJQ8w7REjDVXp4+wcdCQ=
Path: 6ni68208pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.mccarragher.com!news.grnet.gr!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
Bytes: 10505
X-Received-Bytes: 10524
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > if you just look at this thread;
> > [thread i just posted excerpts from]
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.chem/G_ts-y6KiBM/nz-IXX_Lr9UJ
the streamlined version, cuz aioe won't carry something so immense;
if you just look at this thread;
[thread i just posted excerpts from]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.chem/G_ts-y6KiBM/nz-IXX_Lr9UJ
==
but this is how it was this morning, before anyone else gets to it...
as you will notice, -only- archi's psosts are flagged for abuse.
-only- archi is singled out and flagged...
all the rest are "sign in to reply"
=================================================================
spin in physics with monopoles existing Chapt13.4.01 Particle Physics
table #897 New Physics #1017 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
25 posts by 8 authors in sci.chem
Sep 14
Archimedes Plutonium
This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. To see it anyway, click here.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply not flagged
Sep 14
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
there is no "electron dot cloud"
there is a "probability density" which
is oftentimes portrayed -as- a 'cloud'
but that portrayal does -not- suggest that
the hydrogen nucleus is surrounded by a
myriad of myriad of electrons.
-please- fix you .sig file.
=
Sep 14
Archimedes Plutonium
This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. To see it anyway, click here.
Sep 14
Archimedes Plutonium
This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. To see it anyway, click here.
Sep 14
Archimedes Plutonium
This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. To see it anyway, click here.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 14
Re: nonphysicists who open their mouths in physics Re: #1017 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
etc.
=
Sep 14
Archimedes Plutonium
This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. To see it anyway, click here.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 14
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
- show quoted text -
the "electron cloud" -is- a descriptive -device-
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 14
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Timothy Sutter wrote:
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 14
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
no animals will be hurt during
the course of these next
several sentences.
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 14
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
> and you pretty much know where the little box is.
or, like a bowling ball in a baseball stadium.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 14
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
"classical mechanics" simply does not work as the 'best explanation'
when applied to teh behaviors of very small things, like electrons,
and, so-called "quantum mechanics" was developed to provide a more
correct explanation for phenomenon associated with
very small objects and light.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 15
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
> and, the large objects which make up galaxies and stars
> and galaxie clusters are operating in a gravitational field
> and the electronic interactions are negligible and the chemical
> atomic forces are electronic and the gravitational effect is
> negligible and you have yet to show me how gravitational
> fields align in discrete energy levels and not
> a continuous spectrum.
=
Sep 15
Archimedes Plutonium
This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. To see it anyway, click here.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 15
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Timothy Sutter wrote:
>
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 15
Re: electrons don't look like anything as they cannot be seen
> you might like to look into molecular orbital theory
> and consider how atomic orbitals show an overlap
> when bonding occurs.
=
Michael Moroney Sign in to reply
Sep 15
Timothy Sutter <a202...@lycos.com-> writes:
>Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
>> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
My personal guess is that he encountered a diagram of the electron
probability density in a cheap high school chemistry book with primitive
printing techniques, where they represented high probability with lots of
dots close together and low density with few dots. Kind of like old B/W
newspaper photos made of dots, except newspaper photos use bigger/smaller
dots for dark/light and not more/fewer dots. (I have seen such
chemistry books)
He just took the diagram (way) too literally.
=
David Bostwick Sign in to reply
Sep 17
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
Timothy Sutter <a202...@lycos.com-> wrote in
news:5053E507.4EEF@lycos.com-:
Tim, give up. You will never persuade AP that he's wrong. Don Quixote
will defeat the windmill first.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 17
Re: the wave nature of Don Quixote
> >Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> >> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
> Timothy Sutter writes:
> >there is no "electron dot cloud"
> >there is a "probability density" which
> >is oftentimes portrayed -as- a 'cloud'
> >but that portrayal does -not- suggest that
> >the hydrogen nucleus is surrounded by a
> >myriad of myriad of electrons.
Michael Moroney wrote:
> Good luck convincing Archie of that. He's been spewing that crap for
> nearly 20 years.
<...>
David Bostwick wrote:
> Timothy Sutter wrote
> Tim, give up. You will never persuade AP that he's wrong.
> Don Quixote will defeat the windmill first.
i had no intention of chasing it around forever...
=
Brian Salter-Duke Sign in to reply
Sep 17
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:13:05 -0500,
David Bostwick <david.b...@chemistry.gatech.edu> wrote:
> Timothy Sutter <a202...@lycos.com-> wrote in
> news:5053E507.4EEF@lycos.com-:
>
> Tim, give up. You will never persuade AP that he's wrong. Don Quixote
> will defeat the windmill first.
Agreed, but as Pauli once remarked about someone else's ideas, AP is not
EVEN wrong!
--
Brian Salter-Duke Melbourne, Australia
My real address is b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Use this for reply or followup
Collaborating with chemists in Melbourne and World-wide
=
Salmon Egg Sign in to reply
Sep 17
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
In article <GDN5s.1331$Wo3...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>,
Brian Salter-Duke <b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
> Agreed, but as Pauli once remarked about someone else's ideas, AP is not
> EVEN wrong!
I miss Uncle Al.
--
Sam
Conservatives are against Darwinism but for natural selection.
Liberals are for Darwinism but totally against any selection.
=
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway Sign in to reply
Sep 17
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
"Salmon Egg" <Salm...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:SalmonEgg-7D4127.15455017092012@news60.forteinc.com...
In article <GDN5s.1331$Wo3...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>,
Brian Salter-Duke <b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
> Agreed, but as Pauli once remarked about someone else's ideas, AP is not
> EVEN wrong!
I miss Uncle Al.
--
Sam
==============================================
Chiral Idiot!
Feel better now?
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
hanson Sign in to reply
Sep 17
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
"Salmon Egg" <Salm...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke <b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>> Agreed, but as Pauli once remarked about someone
>> else's ideas, Archie-pooh is not EVEN wrong!
>
Sam wrote:
> I miss Uncle Al.
>
Why?
=
David Bostwick Sign in to reply
Sep 18
Re: mistake of not knowing ...
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in news:k38pcv$a5d$1...@dont-email.me:
- show quoted text -
Boy, this is like old home week.
=
Timothy Sutter Sign in to reply
Sep 19
Re: the wave nature of Don Quixote
http://tinyurl.com/carvone-twins
| O O |
// \// \\ / \\
| | | |
\ / \ /
| |
/ \\ // \
(+)carvone (-) carvone
oil of caraway oil of spearmint
====================================================
Message from discussion Tim, does Google have a "locking mechanism" Re: your slip is showing...
| Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
| ©2013 Google |