Message from discussion Guess what, I was right!
From: Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Guess what, I was right!
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1232689763 23394 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2009 05:49:23 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.108.40.206;
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild
4334.5003; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/220.127.116.11 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1
spider-dtc-tg04.proxy.aol.com[CDBC70C4] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1
cache-dtc-ad05.proxy.aol.com[CDBC74C7] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])
On Jan 22, 9:28=EF=BF=BDpm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 11:41=EF=BF=BDpm, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > > True, but I did come up with it myself.
> > > > We'll just have to take your word for it, eh?
> > > I have no reason to lie here.
> > So you say.
> ??? You haven't presented any reason why I might lie about that.
> > > > > I didn't predict the past! I said that when there was no public
> > > > > research on the idea.
> > > > And we'll have to take your word for that also.
> > > I posted a link to the old thread.
> > I'm not disputing the age of the post.
> > But this is not proof you got this idea independently.
> Yeah. According to your theory, I would have had to plan this
> 6 years in advance,
Huh? How does that follow? The fact that you have a post
from six years ago only proves that you made a post six
years ago. It does not prove that, six years ago, you
thought about this subject indepedantly.
> just so I could get in a pointless debate
> with you on usenet. Yeah.
> Anyway, I'm certainly capable of it. On this newsgroup, I proved
<nothing anyone gives a rat's ass about>
> > > What? When have my posts ever showed dishonesty?
> > Oh gee, I don't really read most of your stuff.
> > Wait, maybe a Google search . . .
> > insubject:cunt author:andrew author:usher
> > From: Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com>
> > Newsgroups: soc.men,sci.math,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro
> > Subject: Go fucking kill yourself, you fucking stupid cunt
> > Yeah, I guess that's the one I was thinking of. Still think
> > your word has any value?
> How is that dishonesty?
If you look up "word of honor" in a dictionary, there
won't be any mention of honesty.
While you're at it, look up the definition of "sociopath".
> It's an accurate reflection ('accurate' being
> another word for 'honest') on what I was thinking about that woman's
> trolling me.
> Andrew Usher