Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com>
Newsgroups: sci.chem,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology
Subject: Re: Guess what, I was right!
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <267d6588-f266-4837-bc5c-8a25a584ae54@h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: <3d476c27-e5a8-442a-900a-4a521c17e3b0@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> 
	<55cccfdb-3a3b-4b1f-a535-444975b098f3@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 
	<a0849048-3f4c-4fb3-bbc6-0ef9559daea2@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> 
	<362d26a6-3a97-4ef2-9a4d-36617d27ccea@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> 
	<e06d7125-14d9-4346-8517-15ef25409c6a@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> 
	<93bc3f0a-337a-485c-a22a-35d2e18fc2b9@v13g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> 
	<adb5ccb6-b5d6-4741-91da-54cc25a09bc1@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.199
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1232689763 23394 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2009 05:49:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.116.199; 
	posting-account=OKTeIQkAAAAZk6JK1hK7-grwpoUDNy98
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 
	4334.5003; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.2 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 
	spider-dtc-tg04.proxy.aol.com[CDBC70C4] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 
	cache-dtc-ad05.proxy.aol.com[CDBC74C7] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])

On Jan 22, 9:28=EF=BF=BDpm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 11:41=EF=BF=BDpm, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > True, but I did come up with it myself.
>
> > > > We'll just have to take your word for it, eh?
>
> > > I have no reason to lie here.
>
> > So you say.
>
> ??? You haven't presented any reason why I might lie about that.
>
> > > > > I didn't predict the past! I said that when there was no public
> > > > > research on the idea.
>
> > > > And we'll have to take your word for that also.
>
> > > I posted a link to the old thread.
>
> > I'm not disputing the age of the post.
> > But this is not proof you got this idea independently.
>
> Yeah. According to your theory, I would have had to plan this
> 6 years in advance,

Huh? How does that follow? The fact that you have a post
from six years ago only proves that you made a post six
years ago. It does not prove that, six years ago, you
thought about this subject indepedantly.

> just so I could get in a pointless debate
> with you on usenet. Yeah.
>
> Anyway, I'm certainly capable of it. On this newsgroup, I proved

<nothing anyone gives a rat's ass about>

>
> > > What? When have my posts ever showed dishonesty?
>
> > Oh gee, I don't really read most of your stuff.
>
> > Wait, maybe a Google search . . .
>
> > insubject:cunt author:andrew author:usher
>
> > From: Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com>
> > Newsgroups: soc.men,sci.math,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro
> > Subject: Go fucking kill yourself, you fucking stupid cunt
>
> > Yeah, I guess that's the one I was thinking of. Still think
> > your word has any value?
>
> How is that dishonesty?

If you look up "word of honor" in a dictionary, there
won't be any mention of honesty.

While you're at it, look up the definition of "sociopath".

> It's an accurate reflection ('accurate' being
> another word for 'honest') on what I was thinking about that woman's
> trolling me.

QED

>
> Andrew Usher