Message from discussion Guess what, I was right!
From: Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Guess what, I was right!
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1232681312 8592 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2009 03:28:32 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:28:32 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=126.96.36.199;
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
On Jan 21, 11:41=A0pm, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > True, but I did come up with it myself.
> > > We'll just have to take your word for it, eh?
> > I have no reason to lie here.
> So you say.
??? You haven't presented any reason why I might lie about that.
> > > > I didn't predict the past! I said that when there was no public
> > > > research on the idea.
> > > And we'll have to take your word for that also.
> > I posted a link to the old thread.
> I'm not disputing the age of the post.
> But this is not proof you got this idea independently.
Yeah. According to your theory, I would have had to plan this
6 years in advance, just so I could get in a pointless debate
with you on usenet. Yeah.
Anyway, I'm certainly capable of it. On this newsgroup, I proved
that the limiting critical density of a homologous series is zero
which (it seems from the literature) scientists didn't accept until
recently, making me smarter than them; I also modified the
conventional theory of the run-away greenhouse
, proving that Prof. Kasting was wrong, and giving a testable
that Venus had oceans until about 1 Byr ago.
> > What? When have my posts ever showed dishonesty?
> Oh gee, I don't really read most of your stuff.
> Wait, maybe a Google search . . .
> insubject:cunt author:andrew author:usher
> From: Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: soc.men,sci.math,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro
> Subject: Go fucking kill yourself, you fucking stupid cunt
> Yeah, I guess that's the one I was thinking of. Still think
> your word has any value?
How is that dishonesty? It's an accurate reflection ('accurate' being
another word for 'honest') on what I was thinking about that woman's