Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.chem,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology
Subject: Re: Guess what, I was right!
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <adb5ccb6-b5d6-4741-91da-54cc25a09bc1@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
References: <3d476c27-e5a8-442a-900a-4a521c17e3b0@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> 
	<55cccfdb-3a3b-4b1f-a535-444975b098f3@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 
	<a0849048-3f4c-4fb3-bbc6-0ef9559daea2@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> 
	<362d26a6-3a97-4ef2-9a4d-36617d27ccea@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> 
	<e06d7125-14d9-4346-8517-15ef25409c6a@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> 
	<93bc3f0a-337a-485c-a22a-35d2e18fc2b9@v13g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.118.98.212
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1232681312 8592 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2009 03:28:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:28:32 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.118.98.212; 
	posting-account=p0JNqwkAAAChY16-5zbk2O2xWfBB6K-z
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
	SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

On Jan 21, 11:41=A0pm, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:

> > > > True, but I did come up with it myself.
>
> > > We'll just have to take your word for it, eh?
>
> > I have no reason to lie here.
>
> So you say.

??? You haven't presented any reason why I might lie about that.

> > > > I didn't predict the past! I said that when there was no public
> > > > research on the idea.
>
> > > And we'll have to take your word for that also.
>
> > I posted a link to the old thread.
>
> I'm not disputing the age of the post.
> But this is not proof you got this idea independently.

Yeah. According to your theory, I would have had to plan this
6 years in advance, just so I could get in a pointless debate
with you on usenet. Yeah.

Anyway, I'm certainly capable of it. On this newsgroup, I proved
that the limiting critical density of a homologous series is zero

( http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/browse_thread/thread/713ff77dcdae=
f696?q=3D%22critical+density%22
),
which (it seems from the literature) scientists didn't accept until
recently, making me smarter than them; I also modified the
conventional theory of the run-away greenhouse

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_thread/thread/658ea24a2d981=
5a1?q=3Drun-away+greenhouse

, proving that Prof. Kasting was wrong, and giving a testable
prediction
that Venus had oceans until about 1 Byr ago.

> > What? When have my posts ever showed dishonesty?
>
> Oh gee, I don't really read most of your stuff.
>
> Wait, maybe a Google search . . .
>
> insubject:cunt author:andrew author:usher
>
> From: Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: soc.men,sci.math,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.astro
> Subject: Go fucking kill yourself, you fucking stupid cunt
>
> Yeah, I guess that's the one I was thinking of. Still think
> your word has any value?

How is that dishonesty? It's an accurate reflection ('accurate' being
another word for 'honest') on what I was thinking about that woman's
trolling me.

Andrew Usher