Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Organic NO2 analogs

1 view
Skip to first unread message

hanson

unread,
May 25, 2007, 10:25:42 AM5/25/07
to
There are multitudes of known and commercially used
aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.

Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,
say RH + NF3 --> R-NF2 + HF

Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?
>
Does our NG rersident Nitro-man specialist, Prof. Donald
Haarmann have any info on their properties if they exist?
hanson

Uncle Al

unread,
May 25, 2007, 10:58:55 AM5/25/07
to

Idiot. A real man goes for RSF5 and aluminum or magnesium.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

hanson

unread,
May 25, 2007, 12:37:08 PM5/25/07
to
Idiot "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4656F9AF...@hate.spam.net...
> hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/59893aec79181fa8

There are multitudes of known and commercially used
aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.
>>
Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,
say RH + NF3 --> R-NF2 + HF
>>
Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?
>> >
Does our NG rersident Nitro-man specialist, Prof. Donald
Haarmann have any info on their properties if they exist?
hanson
>
[Idiot Al]

> Idiot. A real man goes for RSF5 and aluminum or magnesium.
>
[hanson]
ahahaha... your beytsim must have fallen off and gummed up your
work if THAT is the answer from uncle Al, the severely gifted idiot.
Your ejaculate does not even address the question because you
have that certain uncertainty about your own masculinity which
seems to loom large on your idiot and Benzilated mind... ahahaha...
There must be too much aluminum in your brain, Al..... tzheimer.
My questions pertains to... well, you wouldn't understand, idiot
Thanks for the laughs, Schwartz... ahahaha....
>
Now does anybody know?.. There must be more than just idiots like
Schwartz on the Usenet.

Androcles

unread,
May 25, 2007, 12:58:11 PM5/25/07
to

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:UgE5i.1781$XC3.386@trnddc04...
: Idiot "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
:

I can't answer your question, your knowledge of chemistry is much
greater than mine. It would be stupid of me to try to guess, I don't
have the expertise. I wouldn't be successful in animal husbandry either.
Does that make me an idiot?
I can support your view of Uncle Stooopid, though.

That imbecile actually believes Einstein's crap, based on
1) Refereed journals.
2) Blind faith.
3) GPS works.

It's a good thing Uncle Stooopid doesn't have a commercial
pilot's license or he'd be landing 90 feet below the runway
and damaging the lobsters flown in from Maine, that's how
good GPS works.
Damage to Uncle Stooopid would be non sequitur.


The_Man

unread,
May 25, 2007, 3:26:25 PM5/25/07
to
On May 25, 10:25 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.

That is the overall stoichiometry of the reaction, but you have left
out something important. If you mix an aromatic compound with just
nitric acid, you'll get something other than you expect.

If you knew the mechanism for this reaction, it would help answer your
questions below.

>
> Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,
> say RH + NF3 --> R-NF2 + HF

Think about the strength of sigma bonds formed between first row
elements

>
> Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
> say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?

Think about what stabilizes chlorine in positive oxidation states.

hanson

unread,
May 25, 2007, 8:23:16 PM5/25/07
to
"The Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1180121185.1...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

> On May 25, 10:25 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
>> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
>> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.
>
[The Dreidel]

> That is the overall stoichiometry of the reaction, but you have left
> out something important. If you mix an aromatic compound with just
> nitric acid, you'll get something other than you expect.
> If you knew the mechanism for this reaction, it would help answer your
> questions below.
>
[hanson]
.... "There are multitudes of known and commercially used aliphatic-
or aryl-nitro compounds"... So, your lamentations about mixing and
expectation and reaction mechanisms are non issues since such
production problems have been solved long ago... which is what is
implied in my intro sentence above... ahaha.... Now listen, Dreidel,
my question is directed at big boys and NOT to undergraduates
who claim to have a PhD, post doc & an assured professorship,
like you did here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/510835821ae61ae9
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f54f2f06b32374ab
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.ai.philosophy/msg/9664b04338862277
<
[ hanson]

>> Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,
>> say RH + NF3 --> R-NF2 + HF
>
[The Dreidel]

> Think about the strength of sigma bonds formed between first row
> elements
>
[hanson]
.. go ahead and do your thinking... but give me the answer to
"Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs" in existence,
instead of your pathetic high school lamentations, by which you
now are trying now to endear yourself to me. Don't be trying to
impress me with your useless loud-mouthing. Say something
useful and intelligent now.. and then we will see... ahahaha....
>>
[hanson]

>> Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
>> say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?
>
[The Dreidel]

> Think about what stabilizes chlorine in positive oxidation states.
>
[hanson]
.. go ahead and do your thinking... but give me the answer to
"Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs" in existence,
instead of your pathetic high school lamentations, by which you
now are trying now to endear yourself to me. Don't be trying to
impress me with your useless loud-mouthing. Say something
useful and intelligent now.. and then we will see... ahahaha....
>
[hanson]

>> Does our NG rersident Nitro-man specialist, Prof. Donald
>> Haarmann have any info on their properties if they exist?
>> hanson
>
[hanson to The Dreidel]
THAT is what YOU should have answered to: "any info on their
properties if they exist", instead of your pathetic and constant
grandstanding and your sui-anointing yourself on my coat tails.
ahaha... Now, remember, Dreidel, take heed,... I don't care if
you remain "My_Fan", but realise, to me you are just a loud toy
to have cyber fun with... so far... ahaha.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Now, try to say something useful & intelligent... For the first time.
Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel
ahahaha... ahahahanson

The_Man

unread,
May 26, 2007, 11:17:43 AM5/26/07
to
On May 25, 8:23 pm, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:

> "The Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_hornee...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:1180121185.1...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...> On May 25, 10:25 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> >> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
> >> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
> >> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.

You asked what I thought was a serious question, and I tried to give
you a serious answer. All you needed to do was look them up in the
chemical databases. Once you find them, you won't understand much
about the compounds of their chemistry.

This is a topic studied in the beginning of the second semester of the
sophmore for a chem, bio, or physics major. This is where most of the
wannabe scientists get the hint that their real purpose in live is
flipping hamburgers or sales.

Evidently, you never even got this far.

>
> [The Dreidel]
> > That is the overall stoichiometry of the reaction, but you have left
> > out something important. If you mix an aromatic compound with just
> > nitric acid, you'll get something other than you expect.
> > If you knew the mechanism for this reaction, it would help answer your
> > questions below.
>
> [hanson]
> .... "There are multitudes of known and commercially used aliphatic-
> or aryl-nitro compounds"... So, your lamentations about mixing and
> expectation and reaction mechanisms are non issues since such
> production problems have been solved long ago... which is what is
> implied in my intro sentence above... ahaha.... Now listen, Dreidel,
> my question is directed at big boys and NOT to undergraduates
> who claim to have a PhD, post doc & an assured professorship,

> like you did here:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/510835821ae61ae9http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f54f2f06b32374abhttp://groups.google.com/group/comp.ai.philosophy/msg/9664b04338862277

Uncle Al

unread,
May 26, 2007, 1:52:08 PM5/26/07
to
The_Man wrote:
>
> On May 25, 8:23 pm, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> > "The Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_hornee...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:1180121185.1...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...> On May 25, 10:25 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> > >> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
> > >> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
> > >> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.
>
> You asked what I thought was a serious question, and I tried to give
> you a serious answer. All you needed to do was look them up in the
> chemical databases. Once you find them, you won't understand much
> about the compounds of their chemistry.
>
> This is a topic studied in the beginning of the second semester of the
> sophmore for a chem, bio, or physics major. This is where most of the
> wannabe scientists get the hint that their real purpose in live is
> flipping hamburgers or sales.
>
> Evidently, you never even got this far.

ahahahanson is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with
overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping all over
himself to be boring, but it is.

hanson

unread,
May 27, 2007, 1:05:58 AM5/27/07
to
AHAHAHA.. this is getting good now. I got me a mooch stuck on my fly-paper:
(2) "The_ Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1180192663.1...@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
(1) "The_Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1180121185.1...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
[orig-hanson]

>> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
>> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
>> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.
>
[1-The Dreidel]

> That is the overall stoichiometry of the reaction, but you have left
> out something important. If you mix an aromatic compound with just
> nitric acid, you'll get something other than you expect.
> If you knew the mechanism for this reaction, it would help answer your
> questions below.
>
[1- hanson]

.... "There are multitudes of known and commercially used aliphatic-
or aryl-nitro compounds"... So, your lamentations about mixing and
expectation and reaction mechanisms are non issues since such
production problems have been solved long ago... which is what is
implied in my intro sentence above... ahaha.... Now listen, Dreidel,
my question is directed at big boys and NOT to undergraduates
who claim to have a PhD, post doc & an assured professorship,
like you did here:
... and so
(2) The_ Dreidel aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com>
keeps on digging his hole deeper with his incessant loud-mouth
news:1180192663.1...@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
and keeps on whining about non-issues to my questions with
>
[2 -The_ Dreidel]

> You asked what I thought was a serious question, and I tried to give
> you a serious answer. All you needed to do was look them up in the
> chemical databases. Once you find them, you won't understand much
> about the compounds of their chemistry.
> This is a topic studied in the beginning of the second semester of the
> sophmore for a chem, bio, or physics major. This is where most of the
> wannabe scientists get the hint that their real purpose in live is
> flipping hamburgers or sales.
> Evidently, you never even got this far.

[2- hanson]
ahahahaha..... Evidently, the loudmouthed Dreidel keeps on lamenting
over an issue (nitration) that I did not ask for and he repeats himself but
he has no useful answers to the pertinent questions below... ahahaha...
... barring his useless theory-advice above... ahahaha...
So, Dreidel, your dilettante, semiprofound full-weaseling above is
noted. Now answer the questions about properties of Fluoraminated
R-NF2 and Oxochlorinated R-ClO2 compounds and spare me from
and with your useless sideshow tripe. So, to help you....
>
[1- hanson repeats for the benefit of the The Dreidel]


THAT is what YOU should have answered to: "any info on their
properties if they exist", instead of your pathetic and constant
grandstanding and your sui-anointing yourself on my coat tails.
ahaha... Now, remember, Dreidel, take heed,... I don't care if
you remain "My_Fan", but realise, to me you are just a loud toy
to have cyber fun with... so far... ahaha.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Now, try to say something useful & intelligent... For the first time.
Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>

[3- hanson]
So, Dreidel, it is clear that you have not said anything useful nor
intelligent... ahahaha... But keep on trying... One day there may
be a "first" for you... ahahaha.... Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel
>
[ 1- hanson ]


>> Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,

>> say RH + NF3 --> + HF
>
[1- The Dreidel]


> Think about the strength of sigma bonds formed between first row
> elements
>

[1- hanson]


.. go ahead and do your thinking... but give me the answer to
"Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs" in existence,
instead of your pathetic high school lamentations, by which you
now are trying now to endear yourself to me. Don't be trying to
impress me with your useless loud-mouthing. Say something
useful and intelligent now.. and then we will see... ahahaha....
>>

[1- hanson]


>> Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
>> say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?
>

[1- The Dreidel]


> Think about what stabilizes chlorine in positive oxidation states.
>

[1- hanson]


.. go ahead and do your thinking... but give me the answer to
"Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs" in existence,
instead of your pathetic high school lamentations, by which you
now are trying now to endear yourself to me. Don't be trying to
impress me with your useless loud-mouthing. Say something
useful and intelligent now.. and then we will see... ahahaha....
>

[hanson -orig]


>> Does our NG rersident Nitro-man specialist, Prof. Donald
>> Haarmann have any info on their properties if they exist?
>> hanson
>

[1- hanson to The Dreidel]

hanson

unread,
May 27, 2007, 1:07:06 AM5/27/07
to
AHAHAHA.. this is getting even better now. I got me two mooches
stuck on my fly-paper... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... with "Uncle Al"
<Uncl...@hate.spam.net> coming out of this UrinAl to see what
the buzz is all about in news:465873C8...@hate.spam.net...
wherein he admitted in a Freudian Slip that he... [drum roll].....
:: Alan Schwartz is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with

:: overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping
:: all over himself to be boring, but it is.
>
(2) "The_ Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com> w/i
news:1180192663.1...@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
(1) "The_Dreidel" aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com> w/i
news:1180121185.1...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
[orig-hanson]

>> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
>> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
>> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.
>
[1-The Dreidel]

> That is the overall stoichiometry of the reaction, but you have left
> out something important. If you mix an aromatic compound with just
> nitric acid, you'll get something other than you expect.
> If you knew the mechanism for this reaction, it would help answer your
> questions below.
>
[1- hanson]

.... "There are multitudes of known and commercially used aliphatic-
or aryl-nitro compounds"... So, your lamentations about mixing and
expectation and reaction mechanisms are non issues since such
production problems have been solved long ago... which is what is
implied in my intro sentence above... ahaha.... Now listen, Dreidel,
my question is directed at big boys and NOT to undergraduates
who claim to have a PhD, post doc & an assured professorship,
like you did here:
... and so
(2) The_ Dreidel aka "The_Man" <me_so_h...@yahoo.com>
keeps on digging his hole deeper with his incessant loud-mouth
news:1180192663.1...@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
and keeps on whining about non-issues to my questions with
>
[2 -The_ Dreidel]
> You asked what I thought was a serious question, and I tried to give
> you a serious answer. All you needed to do was look them up in the
> chemical databases. Once you find them, you won't understand much
> about the compounds of their chemistry.
> This is a topic studied in the beginning of the second semester of the
> sophmore for a chem, bio, or physics major. This is where most of the
> wannabe scientists get the hint that their real purpose in live is
> flipping hamburgers or sales.
> Evidently, you never even got this far.

[2- hanson]


ahahahaha..... Evidently, the loudmouthed Dreidel keeps on lamenting
over an issue (nitration) that I did not ask for and he repeats himself but
he has no useful answers to the pertinent questions below... ahahaha...
... barring his useless theory-advice above... ahahaha...
So, Dreidel, your dilettante, semiprofound full-weaseling above is
noted. Now answer the questions about properties of Fluoraminated
R-NF2 and Oxochlorinated R-ClO2 compounds and spare me from
and with your useless sideshow tripe. So, to help you....
>

[1- hanson repeats for the benefit of the The Dreidel]


THAT is what YOU should have answered to: "any info on their
properties if they exist", instead of your pathetic and constant
grandstanding and your sui-anointing yourself on my coat tails.
ahaha... Now, remember, Dreidel, take heed,... I don't care if
you remain "My_Fan", but realise, to me you are just a loud toy
to have cyber fun with... so far... ahaha.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Now, try to say something useful & intelligent... For the first time.
Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>

[3- hanson]
So, Dreidel, it is clear that you have not said anything useful nor
intelligent... ahahaha... But keep on trying... One day there may

be a "first" for you... ahahaha.... Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel
>
[ 1- hanson ]


>> Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,

>> say RH + NF3 --> + HF
>
[1- The Dreidel]


> Think about the strength of sigma bonds formed between first row
> elements
>

[1- hanson]


.. go ahead and do your thinking... but give me the answer to
"Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs" in existence,
instead of your pathetic high school lamentations, by which you
now are trying now to endear yourself to me. Don't be trying to
impress me with your useless loud-mouthing. Say something
useful and intelligent now.. and then we will see... ahahaha....
>>

[1- hanson]


>> Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
>> say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?
>

[1- The Dreidel]


> Think about what stabilizes chlorine in positive oxidation states.
>

[1- hanson]


.. go ahead and do your thinking... but give me the answer to
"Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs" in existence,
instead of your pathetic high school lamentations, by which you
now are trying now to endear yourself to me. Don't be trying to
impress me with your useless loud-mouthing. Say something
useful and intelligent now.. and then we will see... ahahaha....
>

[hanson -orig]


>> Does our NG rersident Nitro-man specialist, Prof. Donald
>> Haarmann have any info on their properties if they exist?
>> hanson
>

[1- hanson to The Dreidel]


THAT is what YOU should have answered to: "any info on their
properties if they exist", instead of your pathetic and constant
grandstanding and your sui-anointing yourself on my coat tails.
ahaha... Now, remember, Dreidel, take heed,... I don't care if
you remain "My_Fan", but realise, to me you are just a loud toy
to have cyber fun with... so far... ahaha.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Now, try to say something useful & intelligent... For the first time.
Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>

[UrinAl pisses, hisses, kisses and misses]


> ahahahanson is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with
> overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping
> all over himself to be boring, but it is.
>

[hanson]
Idiot. (I am politely using here Uncle Al's standard form of his own
greeting etiquette... Al's own patois so to speak)... .... AHAHAHA
Idiot. Your 3-liner is much more convincing as a Freudian slip by /
from you as it gives you (but not to the Dreidel) a "first", for you
having confessed and characterized yourself eloquently that
::: Alan Schwartz is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with


::: overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping
::: all over himself to be boring, but it is.
>

Al, it is too bad that you cranked yourself so needlessly... ahahaha..
because you do NOT have any answer neither, besides your gay
sidestep-dance that "A real man goes for RSF5 and aluminum or
magnesium"... ahahaha... You are forgiven for that, Al... because
your attempt to console and suck up to the Dreidel is a second
"first" for you, Al... You have finally shown mercy & compassion to
someone.. even if it is a Dreidel... Keep that up, Al... That is much
more productive and endearing then your usual advocacy to murder
half of humankind. It's nice to see you getting soft in your waning years
And as usual: Thanks for the laughs, Schwartz.
ahahaha.... ahahahanson
>
>
BTW, seriuosly for a moment. Forget Al, Mg and R-SF1,3 or-5.
My issue has nothing to do with any pyrotechnics. We are looking
into the situation if/whether R-NF2 or R-ClO2 compounds do have
anti-neoplastic properties. I was hoping for a spark from a shot into
the dark. But this is the Usenet.... ahahaha... ahahaha...
Thanks for playing, though, dudes... Now let's go back to the regular
cyber party with its hilarious 24/7 riots and laughs.... ahahaha....

Uncle Al

unread,
May 27, 2007, 5:51:24 PM5/27/07
to
hanson wrote:
>
> AHAHAHA.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
[snip]
> ahahahaha..... ahahaha... ahahaha...
[snip]

One wonders whether the spewing idiot has a copy-and-paste or types it
out each time. Mostly likely types it.

> ahaha.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
> ahahaha... ahahahanson
[snip]
> ahahaha... ahahaha....
[snip]
> ahahaha....
> ahahaha....
[snip]

Possibly fancies itself Jack Nicholson with green hair and lipstick.

> ahaha.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
> ahahaha... ahahahanson
[snip]
> > ahahahanson
> AHAHAHA
> ahahaha.. ahahaha...
> ahahaha.... ahahahanson
[snip]
> ahahaha... ahahaha...
> ahahaha....

ahahahanson is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with
overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping all over
himself to be boring, but it is.

--

Androcles

unread,
May 27, 2007, 6:19:21 PM5/27/07
to
HAHAHA!
Uncle Stooopid is fucked!

"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message

news:4659FD5C...@hate.spam.net...


: hanson wrote:
: >
: > AHAHAHA.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
: [snip]
: > ahahahaha..... ahahaha... ahahaha...
: [snip]

:
[snop fat wert]

ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
: > ahahaha... ahahahanson
: [snip]
: > ahahaha... ahahaha....
: [snip]
: > ahahaha....
: > ahahaha....
: [snip]

:
[snop fet wart]

. ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
: > ahahaha... ahahahanson
: [snip]
: > > ahahahanson
: > AHAHAHA
: > ahahaha.. ahahaha...
: > ahahaha.... ahahahanson
: [snip]
: > ahahaha... ahahaha...
: > ahahaha....

:
[snop illiterate river of shit (or as Dork would say, anip wet fart)]

Uncle Al

unread,
May 27, 2007, 8:38:54 PM5/27/07
to
Androcles wrote:
>
> HAHAHA!
> Uncle Stooopid is fucked!
[snip carp]

Hey Androclitty - are you still studying to improve your Apgar score?
Even slum bunnies do better than a 3, certainly by the time hair grows
in their pits.

Auriga

unread,
May 27, 2007, 11:37:36 PM5/27/07
to
Why don't you idiots crawl back under the rock you came out from.
Stop polluting this forum with your senseless drivel.

What a bunch of crap you spew. Take it somewhere else.

hanson

unread,
May 28, 2007, 1:10:05 AM5/28/07
to
ahaha..."Auriga" <brad...@msn.com> cranked himself in message
news:1180323456.5...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

> Why don't you idiots crawl back under the rock you came out from.
> Stop polluting this forum with your senseless drivel.
> What a bunch of crap you spew. Take it somewhere else.
>
[hanson]
Well, my good fellow Brad, what we have here is a "failure
in communications"... which is understandable in the glaring
light of a certain poster who refers to himself as "uncle" and ...
who eloquently characterizes himself, by his own words, by
:: Alan Schwartz is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with

:: overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping
:: all over himself to be boring, but it is.
>
Now, Brad, the situation that you so grievously are complaining
about could be rectified if YOU were to show said "uncle" how
to answer intelligently to the OP's initial request as stated in:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/59893aec79181fa8
that was followed up in another previous post with:

My issue has nothing to do with any pyrotechnics. We are looking
into the situation if/whether R-NF2 or R-ClO2 compounds do have
anti-neoplastic properties. I was hoping for a spark from a shot into
the dark. ---- But this is the Usenet.... with its sparkling "uncle Al"...
ahahaha... ahahaha... hanson

hanson

unread,
May 28, 2007, 1:10:06 AM5/28/07
to
It is written... about "a real stupid fool & uptight mooch", namely
the plagiarizer "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> who wrote
in message news:4659FD5C...@hate.spam.net...
> over himself to be boring, but it is.. [a far better self-characterization
> of Alan Schwartz himself... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA...]
> --
> Uncle Al
>
[hanson]
ahahaha... But, Al, do you have to plagiarize everything?
Wasn't it bad enough for you to have plagiarized in your
own arrogance phys/math work you didn't understand
but wanted to brag with in your usual loud-mouthing:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/96dd1c76f2a48fa9
>
... and now you have to "borrow" even laughter?.. That is of course
entirely understandable because the "FAQ about ahaha" states:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/f232cf15901ce7ba
" Whenever you see someone commenting about "ahaha...
AHAHAHA" you know right off the bat that you've got a real
stupid fool & uptight mooch on your hands worth having big
time fun with".
>
So, Al, do continue with being "a real stupid fool & uptight mooch"
and provide me & the rest of the folks (except for your Dingleberries
like "The_Man <me_so_horneeee_Varney>) with laughs over
and about your Fartz, Schwartz..... ahahaha... ahahanson...

BTW,
Al, it is obvious that you are still feeling humbled from your
inability to provide properties for R-NF2/R-ClO2 and you
instead went to help, The_Man "me_so_horneee_VARNEY",
who is your largest personal Dingleberry... ahahaha

But don't worry, Al, not me, not even Varney is depending
on your Scheiss-Advice.... Take it from your semi-beautiful
kin's-woman, Golda Meir, who said: "Schwartz, don't be so
humble you are not that important"....ahahaha....

hanson

unread,
May 28, 2007, 1:10:07 AM5/28/07
to
Awe... Al, Andro made you crank yourself... AHAHAHA...

"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:465A249E...@hate.spam.net...

> Androcles wrote:
>> HAHAHA!
>> Uncle Stooopid is fucked!
> [snip carp]
>
[Al Schwartz]

> Hey Androclitty - are you still studying to improve your Apgar score?
> Even slum bunnies do better than a 3, certainly by the time hair grows
> in their pits.
>
[hanson]
... so, Al, Andro got to you & made you crank yourself...
ahahaha... Serves you right, Al, considering that you
really invited it since you've characterized yourself as
:: Alan Schwartz is the confluence of overwhelming ignorance with

:: overweening arrogance. One wouldn't expect a freak crapping
:: all over himself to be boring, but it is.
>
Thanks for the laughs over your Fartz, Schwartz...
ahahaha... ahahanson

ver...@gmail.com

unread,
May 28, 2007, 3:07:05 PM5/28/07
to

Hi, yes there is though not accessable through your equations.
Difluoramines are well known and producable through either
fluorination of aryl amines or action of tetrafluorohydrazine on alkyl
iodides.

As far as i know chlorate esters are too unstable to exist for long,
though perchlorates are known and some are stable such as
perchlorylbenzene Cl2O7 + Ar-H -> Ar-ClO3 + HClO4 in a solvent
(DCM?), which can be nitrated to the explosive nitroperchlorylbenzene.

Androcles

unread,
May 28, 2007, 4:03:45 PM5/28/07
to

"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:465A249E...@hate.spam.net...

: Androcles wrote:
: >
: > HAHAHA!
: > Uncle Stooopid is fucked!
: [snip carp]

Surely you mean 'snop', Uncle Stooopid.
Aww, was I carping, Uncle Stooopid?
[snop wet fart]


hanson

unread,
May 28, 2007, 6:00:22 PM5/28/07
to
<ver...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180379225.5...@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

> On May 26, 12:25 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>> There are multitudes of known and commercially used
>> aliphatic- or aryl-nitro compounds,
>> say, RH + HNO3 --> R-NO2 + H2O.
>>
>> Are there also such organic Fluo-Nitrogen analogs,
>> say RH + NF3 --> R-NF2 + HF
>>
>> Are there also such organic Chlorate analogs,
>> say RH + HClO3 --> R-ClO2 + H2O, etc?
>>
>> Does our NG rersident Nitro-man specialist, Prof. Donald
>> Haarmann have any info on their properties if they exist?
>> hanson
>
[vermok]

> Hi, yes there is though not accessable through your equations.
> Difluoramines are well known and producable through either
> fluorination of aryl amines or action of tetrafluorohydrazine on alkyl
> iodides.
> As far as i know chlorate esters are too unstable to exist for long,
> though perchlorates are known and some are stable such as
> perchlorylbenzene Cl2O7 + Ar-H -> Ar-ClO3 + HClO4 in a solvent
> (DCM?), which can be nitrated to the explosive nitroperchlorylbenzene.
>
[hanson]
Cool man. Thanks for this info, vermok. Like I said also, my interests
are not for any use in explosives, but to investigate said compound
classes for their properties of potential anti-neoplastic activity.
I'll have my dudes look into this. -- You are a good man, vermok.
Thanks again, hanson
>
>
PS:
Hey, horneeeVarney & urinAl Schwartz, look above.
There is Vermok for you. He's a man of substance,
NOT like you 2 empty puffed-up sow-bladders... ahahaha...

0 new messages