Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
fakery of Higgs boson and why the fakery; Chemistry Analogy of the Higgs boson Chapt13.4004 History of physics from 1860s to 2012 #707 New Physics #827 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 4, 2012, 7:39:35 PM7/4/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Today was more announcement over the fakery of the Higgs boson. They
are in celebration for they found something to which they can attach
their crankery crackpot
ideas. I am celebrating their announcement because the true physicists
did not waste
any of their lifetime in a pursuit over fakery and that the Higgs
episode where it wastes the time of a scientist. If not for the Higgs,
then someone other than AP may have discovered
things I discovered, but because most of the physicists were blinded
to the Higgs boson and then wasted their time in physics on it,
allowed AP to make the discovers that will last.
Now here is a chapter I can place this post for I do not want to spend
any more time on this but since it made such a stir in publicity, for
fakery science makes a lot more stir than does real true science.
Nobody put the Plutonium Atom Totality on the front page of the news,
but fakery like Higgs boson is entreated to such splashy news.
Chapt13.4004 History of physics from 1860s to 2012 and why no-one ever
thought to put the Maxwell Equations as the motor for the nucleus of
atoms
Did Peter Higgs ever analyze the Higgs boson up against whether it
passes a Maxwell theory scrutiny? Likely not. But if one poses the
question to the Maxwell Equations on whether the Higgs boson violates
those equations or not, would quickly find out that the Higgs boson
does violate the Maxwell Equations. Because what holds things together
is the Coulomb force law, yet the Higgs boson challenges the Coulomb
force law and says
something else holds matter together.
But let me give what a Chemist would give as an analogy of the fakery
of the Higgs boson. Instead of a large hadron collider smashing
protons together to synthesize new particles, the chemist would use a
large flask and add to this flask some raw chemicals
and mix and perhaps add some heat and from those raw chemicals the
Chemist ends up with a new molecule found inside the flask. A new
molecule never before seen or studied, some organic new molecule. Now
the Chemist has more maturity and humility to not say that he found a
"God molecule" whereas the silly physicist would instantly claim the
Higgs is a god particle. A lot of this hype is assuredly to con
politicians into spending 10 billion dollars to build LHC of CERN, for
if there was no hype, the politicians would not have thrown away 10
billion dollars on a crank crackpot search for a particle that will
not add any new technology. Europe could have done far better with 10
billion euros in building a volcano electricity power station in
Thermopylae Greece and Vesuvius Italy to shore those countries up in
their sovereign debt crisis rather than be building LHC that chases
after some crackpots dream of a mass-particle.
Why not give Ed Conrad's "man as old as coal" 10 billion euros to
further his dream of
human fossils in coal mines, as to give Higgs boson 10 billion euros.
You see, when you make the Maxwell Equations as the axioms of physics,
then every new idea has to pass through the Maxwell Equations to see
if they agree or disagree. This test was never given to the Higgs
boson, and in the 1960s the way that physics was done back then is
that only a closed knit circle of physicists could ever make
publication of their crankery ideas and no-one outside could critic or
criticize them. The sci newsgroups on the internet, such as this post
to newsgroups can openly criticize the Higgs adventure. If we had had
the Usenet sci newsgroups in 1964 as we have them now, it is likely
that no LHC would have been built chasing after this crackpottery
of a mass-boson.
The Higgs boson fails the Maxwell Equations test-- for it undercuts
the Coulomb force law. And the Maxwell Equations as axioms requires
physics to have only 6 elementary and fundamental particles: proton,
electron, photon, antiproton, antielectron (positron) and antiphoton
(neutrino). So any other so called particle is merely a add-on
derivative of these 6 particles. To say that a particle that the LHC
builds, is elementary and fundamental is as silly of a notion as to
say that our Chemists with their flask discovered a molecule that is
elementary, fundamental and what gives all other molecules their mass.
It is a shame that politicians have a hard time of telling what
physics and physicists are there to waste the time and money of the
world, when we should have spent that 10 billion euros on harnessing
volcano-electricity, on harnessing the Earth's interior energy for it
is clean, renewable and last as long as Earth lasts. It is a shame
that some in physics can hoodwink the entire world community on this
adventure into fakery. Smart enough to spot that Ed Conrad's "man as
old as coal" but not smart enough to spot
a physics fakery of Higgs boson.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
are in celebration for they found something to which they can attach
their crankery crackpot
ideas. I am celebrating their announcement because the true physicists
did not waste
any of their lifetime in a pursuit over fakery and that the Higgs
episode where it wastes the time of a scientist. If not for the Higgs,
then someone other than AP may have discovered
things I discovered, but because most of the physicists were blinded
to the Higgs boson and then wasted their time in physics on it,
allowed AP to make the discovers that will last.
Now here is a chapter I can place this post for I do not want to spend
any more time on this but since it made such a stir in publicity, for
fakery science makes a lot more stir than does real true science.
Nobody put the Plutonium Atom Totality on the front page of the news,
but fakery like Higgs boson is entreated to such splashy news.
Chapt13.4004 History of physics from 1860s to 2012 and why no-one ever
thought to put the Maxwell Equations as the motor for the nucleus of
atoms
Did Peter Higgs ever analyze the Higgs boson up against whether it
passes a Maxwell theory scrutiny? Likely not. But if one poses the
question to the Maxwell Equations on whether the Higgs boson violates
those equations or not, would quickly find out that the Higgs boson
does violate the Maxwell Equations. Because what holds things together
is the Coulomb force law, yet the Higgs boson challenges the Coulomb
force law and says
something else holds matter together.
But let me give what a Chemist would give as an analogy of the fakery
of the Higgs boson. Instead of a large hadron collider smashing
protons together to synthesize new particles, the chemist would use a
large flask and add to this flask some raw chemicals
and mix and perhaps add some heat and from those raw chemicals the
Chemist ends up with a new molecule found inside the flask. A new
molecule never before seen or studied, some organic new molecule. Now
the Chemist has more maturity and humility to not say that he found a
"God molecule" whereas the silly physicist would instantly claim the
Higgs is a god particle. A lot of this hype is assuredly to con
politicians into spending 10 billion dollars to build LHC of CERN, for
if there was no hype, the politicians would not have thrown away 10
billion dollars on a crank crackpot search for a particle that will
not add any new technology. Europe could have done far better with 10
billion euros in building a volcano electricity power station in
Thermopylae Greece and Vesuvius Italy to shore those countries up in
their sovereign debt crisis rather than be building LHC that chases
after some crackpots dream of a mass-particle.
Why not give Ed Conrad's "man as old as coal" 10 billion euros to
further his dream of
human fossils in coal mines, as to give Higgs boson 10 billion euros.
You see, when you make the Maxwell Equations as the axioms of physics,
then every new idea has to pass through the Maxwell Equations to see
if they agree or disagree. This test was never given to the Higgs
boson, and in the 1960s the way that physics was done back then is
that only a closed knit circle of physicists could ever make
publication of their crankery ideas and no-one outside could critic or
criticize them. The sci newsgroups on the internet, such as this post
to newsgroups can openly criticize the Higgs adventure. If we had had
the Usenet sci newsgroups in 1964 as we have them now, it is likely
that no LHC would have been built chasing after this crackpottery
of a mass-boson.
The Higgs boson fails the Maxwell Equations test-- for it undercuts
the Coulomb force law. And the Maxwell Equations as axioms requires
physics to have only 6 elementary and fundamental particles: proton,
electron, photon, antiproton, antielectron (positron) and antiphoton
(neutrino). So any other so called particle is merely a add-on
derivative of these 6 particles. To say that a particle that the LHC
builds, is elementary and fundamental is as silly of a notion as to
say that our Chemists with their flask discovered a molecule that is
elementary, fundamental and what gives all other molecules their mass.
It is a shame that politicians have a hard time of telling what
physics and physicists are there to waste the time and money of the
world, when we should have spent that 10 billion euros on harnessing
volcano-electricity, on harnessing the Earth's interior energy for it
is clean, renewable and last as long as Earth lasts. It is a shame
that some in physics can hoodwink the entire world community on this
adventure into fakery. Smart enough to spot that Ed Conrad's "man as
old as coal" but not smart enough to spot
a physics fakery of Higgs boson.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
0 new messages