Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> Geothermals and Volcano-Electricity is the only renewable with the
> potential to make
> the entire coal and oil industry obsolete.
>
> If the Mount St. Helens before 1980 had several electric power
> stations in operation, or
> Pinatubo in Philippines had several power stations in operation before
> 1990, it is likely
> that the eruptions would not have occurred. And think of all that
> electricity that could have
> been harnessed and still be harnessed.
>
> So in the future of Earth, if we could come back say in year 2309, I
> bet every volcano and
> geothermal on Earth will have numerous electric-power-stations driving
> all the energy needs
> of the entire planet of its human civilization. And the only reason to
> dig up coal or oil is to make some plastic or chemical products for
> use other than transportation. The air in 2309 will
> be crystal clear and have more oxygen content than any previous period
> of human history.
>
> So why is the DOE not mustering a scientific conference to push
> forward at full speed--
> geothermal and volcano electricity for it is the only real big energy
> to tapp into and renewable.
>
> Once a country taps into a volcano, then all the other countries will
> be "full speed ahead".
>
> China and India have abundant volcanoes to tapp into. So does Europe
> with those Italian
> volcanoes.
>
> Solar and wind and hydroelectric are all good sources, but none of
> them can make coal and
> oil obsolete. Only Geothermal/Volcano can make coal and oil obsolete.
>
> How much energy was spewn into the air with Mt. St. Helens or
> Pinatubo? Probably enough
> energy that could have supplied the world with electricity for
> decades.
>
> Probably Yellowstone alone can furnish all the electricity needs of
> the USA lower 48.
>
> How about spending 10 billion dollars on building a Yellowstone
> electric station and with the
> electricity furnish every American home with cheap electricity bills.
> And we still can save
> Yellowstone as a National Park, even make it bigger and more
> protected. So that Yellowstone
> gives back to the American people in electricity and a clean air that
> few Americans have
> ever breathed. That would be a "first" for a National Park, in that
> the Yellowstone National Park saves the American people, whereas up to
> now, the American people have saved
> Yellowstone National Park.
>
> So why be so chincy and cheap with geothermals? It is clear that
> geothermals are the only
> renewable that can make coal and oil obsolete. So let us be brave and
> smart and set up a
> national priority of geothermal/Volcano-electricity.
>
In the above, obviously I have not computed or in any way made some
reasonable
calculation as to whether we can tame a volcano like Pinatubo from
ever erupting
by having electric power stations drawing off heat to make electricity
and thus
preventing the Volcano from exploding. It seems to me that such a
scheme is
possible and thus taming a volcano.
Now I am always looking for why Earth has so much salt water and what
use can
all that salt have for us.
I wonder if we pump saltwater into a volcano such as Pinatubo or
Mt.St.Helens before
it had erupted whether the steam and the salt would have separated out
in the process
and whether the salt would have thus remained behind in the depths of
the volcano.
So that the salt would have aided in cooling the volcano and
increasing the world's
fresh water supply as a added bonus?
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies